Open Source Vs. Patenting

[AB Hammer]

@ Joe Kelley

You defiantly speak like a southern lawyer. And as usual no one out side the courts and those in collage can understand it.

Thanks z.monkey for some clarification.

PS my wife is studying for para legal. And we have allot of fun with the way things have to be written for legal purposes. It is almost like two languages. So as a party of the second part, I render the floor. LOL

[z.monkey]

Howdy ABHammer,

Henceforth, legalese is written to confound the common man, whereas, the sentences are abnormally long, consequently they use really long words, and I submit, as evidence, that they intentionally confuse the common man so as to force the common man to retain legal council.  Whereas the impetus for this uncommon behavior is to fleece the common man of his hard earned, and scarce, resources in the form of money in order to keep the common man from achieving a level of wealth which would allow them pursue their spiritual beliefs.  Whereas, this uncommon mode of suppression is, by design, used to prevent the common man from realizing that he is a Creator GOD, consequently preventing him from rising from the rut in which he has been forced to live.  Heretofore, I submit, that the actions of the Bar Association, and the parallel actions of millions of legal advisers, lawyers, judges, and legal politicians are wholly unlawful.  I, Z.Monkey, do solemnly swear this, wholeheartedly, to be the divine truth, and the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me GOD (Uh, the real GOD, not the legal God.)

Hehehehehehehe....

Blessed Be...

[Joe Kelley]

Anyone,

If you fail to understand written words; blame the writer?

That is ?par for the course?. If you can?t understand the true meaning of what I just wrote, blame me by all means.

Being ignorant isn?t shameful; pretending to be ignorant is.

You can fix ? stupid. Stop pretending to be ignorant.

To z.monkey, specifically, I can offer some data to compete with the ?Peak Oil? data.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=the+energy+non-crisis+by+lindsey+williams&aq=2&oq=the+energy+non

Why not comment on the data and avoid the knee jerk, conditioned responses, where the stupid person who pretends to be ignorant shoots the messenger?

Who needs more proof concerning the effectiveness of dumbing down the plebes?

Check this out:

http://www.cheniere.org/sales/buy-feg.htm

Power produced into a state of oversupply causes something to happen to the price of power.

Really, what happens?

The price goes down.

Really?

Yes, because an abundance of power will not command a high price. Anyone can get power for cheap.

Really?

Yes, and then buying power for a unit of money increases.

You don?t say?

I did say, because it is true.

Really?

Yes, because power reduces the cost of production.

Really?

What is the point?

What is the point of the whole ?shoot the messenger? routine?

I have a guess, but I?d like to hear the honest and accurate answer from the messenger shooters. How about it?

Can you be honest?

[z.monkey]

Howdy Joe Kelley,

WTF???  I was trying to be funny, you're WAY too serious...

Blessed Be...

[Joe Kelley]

z monkey,

My comments that were specfically meant for you involved "Peak Oil". Did you see the link?

Here is another link:

http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=364

When did I become too serious? Was it something I wrote or something you read?