Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Radiant power from Solid state Tesla hairpin circuit

Started by evostars, April 19, 2019, 09:55:08 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

fejleszto

Ivo! Do you know the patent US 2004/0057255 (2004-03-25)? There are a lot of useful informations inside! Please see the text [0057], that is exactly what I was talking about! This patent mentions nothing about resonances, and uses a permanent magnet and iron core. Would be intresting to figure it out how to eliminate them (if possible).

Another intresting patent is the WO 2013/114285 (2013-01-30). Unfortunatelly, it does not cover up any important details.

The circuit from Tesla (Electrical Experimenter 1919-07 or US 609245 from 1898-08-16) what you mentioned in your last video is very fascinating, BUT! He wrote: "The essential parts of such an oscillator are: a condenser, a self-induction coil for charging the same to a high potential, a circuit controller, and a transformer which is energized by the oscillatory discharges of the condenser. There are at least three, but usually four, five or six, circuits in tune and the regulation is effected in several ways, most frequently merely by means of an adjusting screw. Under favorable conditions an efficiency as high as 85% is attainable, that is to say, that percentage of the energy supplied can be recovered in the secondary of the transformer." So, about 0.85 COP is not our goal (I've calculated 70-80% too by my experiments)! Anyway, it is strange that the coil "B" is connected to the positive(+) power supply without blocking diode, not like by your circuit parallel with "A'". But I need to read carefully the whole patent to make conclusions.


evostars

Quote from: fejleszto on January 29, 2021, 07:37:28 AM
Ivo! Do you know the patent US 2004/0057255 (2004-03-25)? There are a lot of useful informations inside! Please see the text [0057], that is exactly what I was talking about! This patent mentions nothing about resonances, and uses a permanent magnet and iron core. Would be intresting to figure it out how to eliminate them (if possible).

Another intresting patent is the WO 2013/114285 (2013-01-30). Unfortunatelly, it does not cover up any important details.

The circuit from Tesla (Electrical Experimenter 1919-07 or US 609245 from 1898-08-16) what you mentioned in your last video is very fascinating, BUT! He wrote: "The essential parts of such an oscillator are: a condenser, a self-induction coil for charging the same to a high potential, a circuit controller, and a transformer which is energized by the oscillatory discharges of the condenser. There are at least three, but usually four, five or six, circuits in tune and the regulation is effected in several ways, most frequently merely by means of an adjusting screw. Under favorable conditions an efficiency as high as 85% is attainable, that is to say, that percentage of the energy supplied can be recovered in the secondary of the transformer." So, about 0.85 COP is not our goal (I've calculated 70-80% too by my experiments)! Anyway, it is strange that the coil "B" is connected to the positive(+) power supply without blocking diode, not like by your circuit parallel with "A'". But I need to read carefully the whole patent to make conclusions.

No I do not know that patent.

Yes in that configuration of Tesla I also reached about 85 % efficiency. But that doesn't mean we can learn from it, and advance it!
My idea still is to use a dual primary coil, and with this circuit it can be done.
It really fascinates me he states there are up to 6 circuits in resonant relation!

I made another video, it show the series mosfets switching together, using a basic Radiant power circuit (2019 april),
which is the same as this tesla oscillator.
This makes it possible to create high voltage (3500V) impulses, from coil discharges.

Many think Tesla only used capacitor discharge impulses, by making use of quenched sparkgaps,
but as the article shows, he used coil discharges in his later years of research,
which benefit because
the discharge energy doesn't pass the switch (spark). If the Tesla oscillator coil discharge, was tuned properly,
it would discharge through the series resonant (low impedance=wire resistance) primary coil,
and would NOT create a spark when the commutator opened the coil circuit, that created the voltage impulse.
Thats why his relays coil kept working so long.

This new video  of me, shows the series mosfets switching:
https://youtu.be/7vfDjN2hkBg

Multiple mosfets could be used, but the bottle neck would probably be the isolated gate driver (which could be a optocoupler with glass fiber)
, and the isolated dc dc converter (which could be a battery).
I tried using 1700V mosfets, but their pinout was wrong.
The c3m1200V mosfets are on order but should be available later this year.

fejleszto

I've found an intresting wiki article: "Resonant inductive coupling", see attached!

"Power transfer: Because the Q can be very high, even when low power is fed into the transmitter coil, a relatively intense field builds up over multiple cycles, which increases the power that can be received at resonance far more power is in the oscillating field than is being fed into the coil, and the receiver coil receives a percentage of that."

How can I understand this statement?

NdaClouDzzz

Quote from: fejleszto on February 01, 2021, 12:20:29 PM
How can I understand this statement?

Tank circuits recycle energy!!!!!!!!!

Resonance in a parallel LC circuit: "If the frequency of the applied current is the circuit's natural resonant frequency..., resonance will occur, and a small driving current can excite large amplitude oscillating voltages and currents. In typical tuned circuits in electronic equipment the oscillations are very fast, from thousands to billions of times per second". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LC_circuit

https://overunity.com/18239/the-solution/msg555085/#msg555085


https://youtu.be/e9UIZ6_4D5k

https://youtu.be/7Q0CGxOJS4I

https://youtu.be/WV6qMGd7fYc

https://youtu.be/cAVKC1myP1s