Radiant power from Solid state Tesla hairpin circuit

[onepower]

synchro1

I am wondering how your "Coil Capacitor" is any different then simply discharging a coil connected to an ordinary Capacitor?

I am wondering how you could think something so completely absurd...

Evo
Last I heard Nelson Rocha was working for a big corporation trying to integrate his working FE technology into real products. Like most inventors he probably just got tired of all the paid shills and clueless people in the forums. I imagine Nelson has retired on a beach somewhere a wealthy man while most here continue to make zero progress.

Nelson is an intelligent man and he left out the working element schematic in his diagrams. So these circuits you and others are building are incomplete and cannot work as shown.

Regards
AC

[synchro1]

@Onepower,

We can wire a capacitor in series or parallel to an inductor. We can discharge the resonant AC or interrupt the series connected LC from ground or power. How can the "Coil Capacitor" be discharged in some other way? I fail to see how the design can work any differently!

My CMOS thread has applied the circuit as a pulse magnetizer. Tesla's original patent for his bifilar spiral was specifically described as a tool to magnetize ferrite. This "Quantum" effect is Overunity by a factor of infinity!

Tinsel Koala insisted on measuring zero difference in the coil's self generated field from direct current. The coil only performs when charged on interruption.

Robert Murray Smith has a video of an Alnico core coil between two stators that switchs the magnet on and off with a pulse. Evostars circuit would be ideal for this kind of powerful magnet switch! This is more than a PMH effect. The same pulse will both magnetize and de magnetize with no pole reversal.

[onepower]

Synchro1

We can wire a capacitor in series or parallel to an inductor. We can discharge the resonant AC or interrupt the series connected LC from ground or power. How can the "Coil Capacitor" be discharged in some other way? I fail to see how the design can work any differently!

In some sense we could say the whole field of science and invention relates directly to seeing or making something work differently. Logically this must be true otherwise no progress would be made and everything would remain the same.

The biggest mistake most make is being superficial where they only see 2D surfaces or objects. However in the real world, like nature, everything is fluid always acting within three dimensions.

Consider the fact that the surface of the planet is one (-) charged capacitor plate and the atmosphere a (+) charged capacitor plate. You, everyone and everything are within the electric field continually disturbing it. In fact I once built an entire circuit on the face of a parallel capacitor plate just to prove the whole circuit becomes biased like on Earth. Think about that, building a circuit on the surface of a capacitor plate, what do you think would happen?.

You see, as an Engineer/inventor my problem is the exact opposite of yours and I have literally thousands of options and concepts to choose from. There are literally thousands of ways I could make any LC circuit components act differently. So many that I have learned to become very selective in what kinds of experiments I want to do.

For example here is an experiment I did which is a real mind bender...
As we know the greatest charge density is always on the surface of an object because like charges repel. The charges always move to any extremity on the surface which is usually the edges. However if we take a plate charged on the surface and fold the plate edges upwards until they touch the outside is now the inside. As the charge inside a conductor is always zero where did the charges go?, well they moved outside through the conductor. Most cannot even imagine this but the next obvious step would be to build a pseudo/fluid plate continually folding in on itself forcing a constant radial current through itself. Here we can see the fluid itself is now the capacitor, the conductor and the induced/inducer.

The example above is why so many people living in a superficial 2D world will never understand what most inventors are thinking. There is so much going on, on so many levels, involving so many different concepts it just becomes impossible to wrap there mind around. So is my experiment above is the capacitance in series or parallel with the inductor?, lol.

The lesson here is that just because we cannot imagine something does not mean others cannot because we are obviously not them.

Regards
AC

[synchro1]

Synchro1
In some sense we could say the whole field of science and invention relates directly to seeing or making something work differently. Logically this must be true otherwise no progress would be made and everything would remain the same.

The biggest mistake most make is being superficial where they only see 2D surfaces or objects. However in the real world, like nature, everything is fluid always acting within three dimensions.

Consider the fact that the surface of the planet is one (-) charged capacitor plate and the atmosphere a (+) charged capacitor plate. You, everyone and everything are within the electric field continually disturbing it. In fact I once built an entire circuit on the face of a parallel capacitor plate just to prove the whole circuit becomes biased like on Earth. Think about that, building a circuit on the surface of a capacitor plate, what do you think would happen?.

You see, as an Engineer/inventor my problem is the exact opposite of yours and I have literally thousands of options and concepts to choose from. There are literally thousands of ways I could make any LC circuit components act differently. So many that I have learned to become very selective in what kinds of experiments I want to do.

For example here is an experiment I did which is a real mind bender...
As we know the greatest charge density is always on the surface of an object because like charges repel. The charges always move to any extremity on the surface which is usually the edges. However if we take a plate charged on the surface and fold the plate edges upwards until they touch the outside is now the inside. As the charge inside a conductor is always zero where did the charges go?, well they moved outside through the conductor. Most cannot even imagine this but the next obvious step would be to build a pseudo/fluid plate continually folding in on itself forcing a constant radial current through itself. Here we can see the fluid itself is now the capacitor, the conductor and the induced/inducer.

The example above is why so many people living in a superficial 2D world will never understand what most inventors are thinking. There is so much going on, on so many levels, involving so many different concepts it just becomes impossible to wrap there mind around. So is my experiment above is the capacitance in series or parallel with the inductor?, lol.

The lesson here is that just because we cannot imagine something does not mean others cannot because we are obviously not them.

Regards
AC

Suppose I have an LC circuit in resonance and so do you and when we interrupt the current and discharge them we wind up staring at a nearly identical standing longitudinal wave ring signature on our oscilloscopes? All the differences you allude to vanish in the violence of the collapse along with mine!

You act as a Svengali with your seductive surrealism. A capacitor designed with additional plates would do nothing to add any advantage to the one with the existing two. That proves to be a waste of time.

[synchro1]

Testing has confirmed an Alnico switch superior to an electromagnetic coil.  The strength of the Alnico needs to match the power of the neo backing magnet.