Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet motor idea hopefully solved

Started by Low-Q, June 14, 2019, 10:59:32 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Low-Q

Quote from: vineet_kiran on August 26, 2019, 11:42:01 PM
I didn't  understand the working concept but as for as my experience, you need a tangential force to rotate a pulley or a wheel.  In your shown figure, the stater magnet will simply push out the repelling portion of chain and pull in the attractive portion of the chain. There is no tangential force to keep the pulley rotating.  ( if I have got it right)
May be I am wrong.  Wish you good luck.
That is actually a very good explanation, and I believe it is something right about it.
So, what you suggest is that if I push on the vertical chain, I can push as hard as I want without turning the rotor?


I must remind you that it is a gear at each of the bottom pulleys that will get a tangential force from the stationary sprocket, shown in the image earlier, which will force the pulleys to turn and wind the chain into constant position when the rotor turns. What do you think?


Vidar

vineet_kiran

Quote from: Low-Q on August 27, 2019, 08:08:57 AM

I must remind you that it is a gear at each of the bottom pulleys that will get a tangential force from the stationary sprocket, shown in the image earlier, which will force the pulleys to turn and wind the chain into constant position when the rotor turns. What do you think?


For turning the rotor you should have a tangential force on the rotor which operates rack and pinion arrangement (gears) to rotate the
pulley. 




Low-Q

Quote from: vineet_kiran on August 27, 2019, 10:25:18 AM
For turning the rotor you should have a tangential force on the rotor which operates rack and pinion arrangement (gears) to rotate the
pulley.
Yes. I know. I will figure this out in a few days. I received the ballbearings today so I can complete the build.
Then I'll do some mechanical tests, maybe just use the air compressor on the vertical chain parts to see if the rotor will turn at all.
The stainless steel ballbearings will be put in pairs for each pulley to reduce friction. Easier to tell what's going on that way.


Vidar

Low-Q

Like a glove. Testing ballbearings.


Vidar

Low-Q

Mounted all the bearings. 48 pcs in total. The 6 teeth pulleys are too small. The belt is cogging a lot.
So I redesign the rotor to have larger pulleys, 12 teeth, and twice the diameter.
This will reduce cogging, and I can choose a 1:1 gear ratio which means a lot for better grip and less complications. However, larger pulleys might force the chain to twist more at shorter distance.
Here is a video that shows the cogging.
https://youtu.be/vLGRJyvR0Ao


Vidar