Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Creating TPU Steven_Mark

Started by crashangel, September 06, 2019, 02:25:16 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

DavidWolff

Quote from: sm0ky2 on November 14, 2019, 05:51:04 PM
This site monitors the earth's heartbeat
http://https://www.disclosurenews.it/en/schumann-resonance-today-update/


Any receiver tuned to a multiple of this freq.
will be able to harness energy from it


A resonant (tank) circuit and appropriate transistor, can amplify it.


This is what the TPU is designed to do.
Tesla also built an equivalent circuit
Mr Smoky2 I think we have all tried that out over the past 10 years or so, I'm pretty sure it doesn't work in that mode!
PS your hyperlink fails for me too  8) :o
Dave

endlessoceans

Quote from: sm0ky2 on November 12, 2019, 02:54:59 AM

Last, get a current data reading of the Schumman
I believe it was approaching 8 last time I checked?
And do the math down to a 'reasonable' length for you to handle


And always remember: Steven left us everything we need to know



If SM left us everything we need to know then this site would have a hundred replications by now.   Opposite is true.  SM told the public only what was necessary to completely muddy the waters so that NOBODY would ever be able to replicate based on WHAT HE SAID.  He was a liar and versed in the art of misdirection.


1)  Schumann Resonance is NOT just one freq.  The Schumann resonances (SR) are electromagnetic oscillations of the Earth-ionosphere cavity at frequencies of 7.8, 14, 20, 26, 33, 39, and 45 Hz.

2)  I almost guarantee that his device has nothing to do with those particular resonances  .SM himself showed a number of TPUs in different sizes and ALL of them ran at vastly different frequencies.  One was at the thousands of HZ.  Go watch the videos again. 

3)  There are other forces at work that it may have been based on and he did NOT say anything about those.  That is what is more interesting.


sm0ky2

1) you are on the right track, but your math needs to be more precise,
as it has to be carried out into a manageable length of wire.


2) He told us why they were different sizes.


3) the only forces at play are positive feedback.
  (constructive interference)
the entire system has to be designed to the base signal.


It doesn't have to be the earth's freq.
These days there are thousands to tap into.
I was fixing a shower-rod, slipped and hit my head on the sink. When i came to, that's when i had the idea for the "Flux Capacitor", Which makes Perpetual Motion possible.

onepower

Endlessoceans
QuoteIf SM left us everything we need to know then this site would have a hundred replications by now.   Opposite is true.  SM told the public only what was necessary to completely muddy the waters so that NOBODY would ever be able to replicate based on WHAT HE SAID.

I guess it would depend on your perspective and what you think he said.

In my opinion the best clue SM left was probably the one everyone ignored when SM said to consider all the things which could happen in a single length of wire. It's silly isn't it because we know everything about everything and we have nothing to learn about a silly wire. However as we know every individual part inside that wire is moving near the speed of light. That wire contains enough internal atomic/molecular energy to level a small city if only we could access the energy.

Fission and fusion are one very expensive and complicated way however I suspect some people found easier methods. Think of it this way, nuclear fission, as in an atomic bomb, creates a chain reaction liberating massive amounts of latent atomic energy within matter. However what if we only wanted a little energy... a little kick?. Could we use a different low energy process to produce only a few high energy particles and knock a few electrons around to produce a little kick versus a thermo-nuclear detonation?.

Apparently the answer is yes and some real Engineers at the "SAFIRE project" say they have produced a low energy variation of cold fusion using a HV plasma in an almost table top unit. Imagine that, now what if we could take a bunch of wires and switches and produce a HV plasma and co-ordinate the electrical forces in such a way that it produced forces similar to SAFIRE which could look like anything. It could look like a motor-generator, a Tesla coil, a transformer... so long as the internal process produced similar results.

No energy from nothing, no secret sauce or over-unity would be required... just a little knowledge, understanding and a great deal of ingenuity.

Think of a thermo-nuclear device or the Sun then reduce it down to something half the size of your refrigerator like the SAFIRE device. Now reduce that down by the same magnitude to something the size of a component, say a commutator brush or switch. Why it could be that the missing ingredient, the secret sauce could be transmutation/cold fusion occurring in the plasma created in between the switch contacts as it opens under the proper conditions. That extra little "kick" which appeared in the circuit for reasons most couldn't explain.

Science is like that, science is like a box of chocolates and you never really know what your going to get under the right conditions. The we know everything and predetermination nonsense, that's for egomaniacs not real scientists because in fact there is more that we do not know than we could ever know. I mean, everything we think we know as tangible is actually 1% matter moving near the speed of light in 99% free space filled with terrawatts of Electro-magnetic energy ie. "Feynman's free space energy" ... so what do we really know of Energy?.

QuotePhysicists Richard Feynman and John Wheeler calculated the zero-point radiation of the vacuum to be an order of magnitude greater than nuclear energy, with a single light bulb containing enough energy to boil all the world's oceans.

Regards




onepower

QuotePhysicists Richard Feynman and John Wheeler calculated the zero-point radiation of the vacuum to be an order of magnitude greater than nuclear energy, with a single light bulb containing enough energy to boil all the world's oceans.

I added this quote so people understand that "Energy" was never the problem as we are obviously swimming in a sea of energy. All of the most intelligent scientists and physicists agree energy is everywhere in everything and it is only the misguided who think differently. So this notion of "getting energy" from somewhere is wrong as the energy is already present and what we want is to convert or transform energy.

My first experiments were based on basic observations of the TPU and it seemed like an obvious first step to me. The TPU configuration has horizontal collector coils with three control coils, equally spaced at 120 Deg, wrapped around the collector at right angles to it. This is a problem because one coil A wrapped around another coil B, at a right angle, cannot induce any amount of current in B. The changing magnetic field poles from coil A are acting in the same direction as the path of conduction of B which is longitudinal to it and does not work. In order to understand why we must go back and study Faraday's Laws of Induction to understand what Faraday actually said and more so what he implied. If you want to understand a law then we should read it in the words of the person who actually wrote it not some second hand interpretation.

However sometimes our experiments at the bench do not always agree with some often misinterpreted law written in a textbook. As it were I found I could induce a current with the coils at right angles because of another set of laws, Weber's Electrodynamic Laws, which supersede Faraday's Laws and do allow for a longitudinal force to produce induction. Which is kind of a kick in the pants isn't it?, sure the laws apply and are equally valid in the context they were implied but that does not change the fact there are two sets of laws for induction. Faraday's law for parallel induction and Weber's law for serial or longitudinal induction.

So I was wondering how many experimenters here found they could induce a current in a coil with the inducing coil at right angles to the induced coil?.

Regards