Gravity motor 2 rotor

[miloszlaw]

Two rotors shifted relative to each other allow if the bearing is used with relatively low friction to hold the weights in one position. My model is too imprecisely made to work.
https://youtu.be/cFgTsWNiWBE
I don't have a good workshop to do it precisely

[Turbo]

The problem with most of these things is that the entire weight of the wheel is centered on one point.

You have to work with the weight of the wheel also.
And that means eccentric axle.

[citfta]

Two rotors shifted relative to each other allow if the bearing is used with relatively low friction to hold the weights in one position. My model is too imprecisely made to work.
https://youtu.be/cFgTsWNiWBE
I don't have a good workshop to do it precisely

An interesting design.  I saw in the video that you have more weighted arms laying on the ground.  What happens when you mount them to the wheels?  From the video it looked like your wheels stopped because with only two weighted arms it reached a balance point.  With more arms it appears it would work.


Thanks for sharing,
Carroll

[Turbo]

No it would not work the whole weight is on one center point.

You really need to understand Gravity and the point of potential.

[miloszlaw]

An interesting design.  I saw in the video that you have more weighted arms laying on the ground.  What happens when you mount them to the wheels?  From the video it looked like your wheels stopped because with only two weighted arms it reached a balance point.  With more arms it appears it would work.

The problem is friction. Bicycle wheels are not suitable for this idea. The distances to the pins with bearings must be the same throughout the entire rotation. Otherwise, stress is generated that prevents rotation.