Getting energy from asymmetry of the magnetic field experiment

[ayeaye]

A Newton is a time derived quantity. Kilogrammeters per second per second.

The  m / s ^ 2  is an acceleration, not time. Newton is a force necessary to accelerate 1 kg at  1 m / s ^ 2 . kg is a unit of mass, but in the Earth's gravity, a force to 1 kg is approximately 9.8 N, because of the Earth's gravity acceleration  9.8 m / s ^2 , 1 N is thus  1 kg / 9.8 .

And this is just because of how Newton is defined, the Earth's gravity causes an object to accelerate at  9.8 m / s ^ 2 , when there are no obstacles to it's movement. But Earth's gravity can also cause other effects, it causes force, that depends on the mass of the object.

The acceleration in the definition of Newton is only because a force causes acceleration, it is defined in that way, a force can also cause other effects.

A Newton meter, such as spring scales, has nothing to do with time. It measures force, and when used to measure weight, it measures force caused by Earth's gravity.

[kolbacict]

And the other end rests on the plate?

[ayeaye]

And the other end rests on the plate?

It did rest on my finger. I just didn't care to make another end, but i think it's possible. These four magnets form like a cavity in which the magnet can rest, it contains the magnet in all directions.

[ayeaye]

Sm0ky2,

But i think i understand what do you mean.

1 Newton indeed gives an object a power to accelerate  1 m / s ^ 2 . Thus

1 N = 1 N * 1 m / 1 s  =>  m / s = 1  =>  m = s . Meter equals to second, weird yes?

Newton should be defined as power necessary to accelerate 1 kg at  1 m / s ^ 2 ? In spite of that, force remains what it is, and spring scales measure force. All the measurements and calculations are correct, the question is only what force means.

Power is necessary for acceleration, thus, when we can show that an object accelerates, that is it's speed increases, when going through all the field, then that's all we need to show. This means a gain of energy, no need then to measure any forces and distances moved, to show a gain of energy.

This i think may be one thing how they hide the fact that field, such as a gravitational field, really provides power, that gives energy to the objects. It is that the gravitational field is spherical, and no more power is given when an object falls to the ground. A field can give continuous power when it's not symmetric. They may try to hide that field provides power, and that we have to spend energy, to get the same amount of energy back, is really due to symmetry of the gravitational field, and not because of conservation of energy, as they want to say.

[ayeaye]

Start from measurements. There is likely no other way to make a continuously working device, if ever possible. Better don't try to make it and hope that it succeeds, the possibility for that is like a possibility to find a needle in the haystack. A rather senseless activity.