Floor's Magnets explained

[Floor]

@ All readers

[Floor]

Check this out...

[Floor]

high efficiency latch

[Floor]

@Synchro

A rebellion against some thing or some idea, is still a product of and
conditioned by, that which is being rejected.

One of the reasons (I think) we don't see magnet motors every where
is that,
                                 If
we simply reject  "the impossibility of Perpetual motion",
we have already limited our thinking to an image of O.U. as meaning
a device which is in constant or continuous motion. i.e  perpetual... motion.
                                   Devilish isn't it ?

mechanical work per unit of time = power
                             Or
energy per unit of time = power

work = force x displacement  (discounting acceleration against inertia)
                            Or
kinetic energy = 1/2 x mass x velocity squared
(as energy to cause acceleration against inertia)

Commonly, designers seek to improve the energy efficiency of mechanical
devices through circular momentum.  This is because it requires an input of
energy to accelerate an object against its inertia. 

It CAN be tremendously wasteful to accelerate an object over and over again,
                                    If
we can instead  maintain its momentum by a circular motion.
                                             But
the greater the mass of ...
               And
the greater the speed to which we accelerate an object to ....
               Then
the greater also, is the amount of energy we expend to cause that objects
acceleration
                                            But.
                                 Don't be in a hurry !

If we trade off
high speed
               for instead ...
high force ...
(and keep the mass low as possible).

we can avoid wasting energy in accelerations AS EFFICIENTLY AS IF WE WERE
MAINTAINING CONSTANT THE MOMENTUM !

                                  high force but slow moving

                                Then
convert it to high speed rotational later if we so desire !

[Floor]

@ All readers

Drop these assumptions if you want to understand the
                      "floor's magnets"
                              designs.

FALSE and yet almost always assumed as to what would be
needed in order for a mechanical magnetic device to self run :
 
Error 1. the device must have continuous motion in order to self run.
Error 2. the device must involve rotation in order to self run.

                We want it to self run, right ?
.... ..... ..... ...... .........
                                       NEXT
                  Because it would be easy to waste energy.

If one wishes to store energy from the output of a magnetic interaction, by
placing it into a mechanical spring, one would do well to consider these facts.

                        Given two magnets in REPULSION.
Magnet forces and spring forces, peaks, in their force to distance curves
                             are out of synchronization.

magnet
           force is greatest at the beginning of the repulsion (near)

                                   in contrast

spring
          force is greatest at the end of a springs compression
                           also
         force is greatest at the end of a springs stretch
... .... ..... ...... .......
                                NEXT
Between a given two permanent magnets, the attraction possible is almost always greater
than the repulsion possible.

Although in the context of the discussion of the balancing of magnetic attraction
force with magnetic repelling force, I frequently refer to attractions as being equal
to repulsions,
                           that balance generally, must be created by design.
... .... ..... ...... .......
                                NEXT
All for now..