Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



"Magnet shear to direct pull work ratio"

Started by Floor, July 16, 2020, 08:59:39 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Floor

Maybe 69% more energy as mechanical work out, than the mechanical work
which was input.....

           EDIT 12/08/21

10358 input
11293 output
935 difference

935 is x % of 10358 ?

100 / 10358 = 0.00965

0.00965  x 10358 = 9.026839 % O.U.

10358 (input) is      91.72 % of        11293 (output)




Floor

      @ Lota

Kenneth C. Kozeka / the EDEN project PDF

Are already liked to earlier in this topic
                            @
https://overunity.com/18551/magnet-shear-to-direct-pull-work-ratio/msg553381/#msg553381

                    Thanks for the additional link to that  project / PDF.
                                                      and
                                     Also thanks for the link to the patent.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...

The magnet actions / motions, I measured are similar to those shown in the patent.
That device is a continuous motion device.

The gear and shaft linkages in the patent drawing, indicate that the magnets must
all be moving , when any one of them is moving.
... ... ... ... ... ... .. .. .. .. .... ...
The interactions I have described are such that, an action begins, that action completes,
a next action begins, that next action completes and so on.  All motion comes completely
to a stop, then a / the next motion begins.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
     however...
One might also slow an action down so much so (very near to the end of its motion) that it
serves practically the same purpose as does arresting completely that motion.

It seem as though  Kozeka's method is  intended to accomplish this by means of variable
gearing or pulleys.  This is described else where in the patent.
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Other wise....
     yes, they are both about lateral and direct magnet attractions.

Floor

I'm pretty satisfied with this test. 

I going to leave this topic available for others to post in / for me to get feed back in,
for a time.

Eventually I will lock it, so that it remains short and sweet / complete.

                                                        best wishes
                                                               floor
  P.S.
Looking forward to getting back to that other build.

Floor

note..

I find only a U.S application for a patent not a
patent its self.

                  floor