Earth Question

[Paul-R]

I think most people these days are happy with the performance of their sat navs that tell them where they are to a high degree of precision.  And the whole GPS math that gives them that data is predicated on the earth being an oblate spheroid.  The geometry of a flat earth having satellites flying in circles above it would require different math.  And there would be nothing to keep the satellites up there anyway.

Smudge

Your idea of GPS is good but, because it undermines them, they will call it "Fake news". They can't say that about a magnet on the end of a piece of string.
Come to think of it, yes, they can. They can say anything they want, however stupid.

[Temporal Visitor]

Oh my aren't you some kind of special!

You most certainly didn't watch the ~31 minute video I left a link for, evidenced by your need of an explanation from me as to how to make your go West circumnavigation flight.

Get yourself a pocket compass. Buy an air ticket from, say, London to Los Angeles. Then another from there to Tokyo. then another from Tokyo to London.

Like I wrote before that your reading comprehension wasn't so good, well now it appears your memory isn't all that sharp either since you seem to have forgotten that I am a pilot.

That said you should have known my flying time involves navigating with far better than just "a pocket compass".

Explain why the compass is pointing roughly west for the whole expedition.

OK: Sure I can and will kindly explain it to you;
BUT YOU NEED TO KNOW I cannot UNDERSTAND IT FOR YOU.

Lines of LATITUDE are E/W on either model. Lines of Longitude are N/S on either theoretical model.

Globe models theorize N pole on top center, and S on bottom center of a 1 rpm - 1040 mph spinning ball in space.

F.E. models vary, but many also theorize N pole at center, surrounded by an outermost S pole ring, and having the same rings of latitude as the spinning ball theory between the poles.

Your selection of destinations are roughly about the same ~40 degree LATITUDE, and circular flight plans without regard to either belief system.

Here is the last 5 minutes of the video you never watched https://youtu.be/TTenIvtu90k?t=1650
It covers the exact explanation you need.     

Idiot.

You really don't need to show/prove your own ignorance any further, it is a self evident truth though I wish it wasn't so. Still sincerely looking forward to seeing it change when you realize your beliefs cannot irrefutably prove earth is a globe. (I tried, I still don't know, I have many serious unanswered questions and I admit it.)

Do some research yourself about your theoretical model and all the assumptions you need to rely on to support it to explain the "curved water" needed but can't be found as it is proven fact it always seeks level and no experiment ever done shows differently OR any curvature all.

Please do "Take all the time you need" or just know You are "cleared for takeoff" at your discretion.

Got wings?.

[Paul-R]

... since you seem to have forgotten that I am a pilot.

Here is the last 5 minutes of the video you never watched https://youtu.be/TTenIvtu90k?t=1650
It covers the exact explanation you need.     

I don't believe you are a pilot.
You've achieved a monopole. The model does not show the south pole or the lines of force between them.

[partzman]

I don't believe you are a pilot.
You've achieved a monopole. The model does not show the south pole or the lines of force between them.

You might be interested in the following-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPlNcJ_IC5w

Pm

[Temporal Visitor]

Thank you for doubting me, if you knew me at all you would "know" I can typically back up my words rather well.
I live to WORK and tell the truth. (Might even be the only reason.)
I have no reason to lie to you or anyone about that fact.

It is really no big deal to anyone else but does represent just one small achievement of several I set and hoped for myself to be able accomplish in and with aircraft during my life. You wouldn't believe the others either, but so what the "objective evidence" or proof is available to those who have gotten to know me somewhat better. Who "knows" - perhaps you might try.

Here is where you could prove it from .gov records https://amsrvs.registry.faa.gov/airmeninquiry/Main.aspx
I even looked for myself and found myself to be listed, imagine that.
However you are missing certain "knowledge" needed to see it for yourself, and there is no real need at this point.

I don't believe you are a pilot.
You've achieved a monopole. The model does not show the south pole or the lines of force between them.

No I have not achieved a monopole. You might think that, but that WORK belongs to another - not me.
Not my model either it was to let you see what I explained.

You are welcome to do as you decide: From nothing comes nothing. - Those who do nothing get nothing.