Free Energy RANT CAFFE ASYLUM

[onepower]

I thought this was interesting...  https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2021/oct/14/climate-change-happening-now-stats-graphs-maps-cop26

The climate disaster is here.

In rural Canada the silence is deafening and all those who were ranting about climate change being a hoax are now silent. The fact is, they all got caught with there pants down and now look foolish. The crops here were a blow out and the hay nonexistent forcing a mass sell off of cattle and next year looks no better. We also experienced record low water levels everywhere the likes of which I have never seen in my lifetime. Record smoke from wildfires also occurred most of the summer the likes of which I had never seen before. Record temperatures also occurred almost everywhere over an extended period of time causing the electrical grid to be pushed to the limit.

It's strange how all those people calling climate change a hoax now have nothing to say. However we all knew this was coming didn't we?, we all knew this was coming and we all know exactly where the lies came from...

The phrase, Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me, comes to mind...

Regards
AC

[AreYouSure?]

Transistors are not switches.  They are current controlling devices.  They have to have a voltage at the collector and current available for them to operate.  I see no source of current for them to switch in your drawings.  Yes, you can turn them fully on and off like a switch but only if they have current available for them to switch.


Respectfully,
Carroll

That goes for the bipolar transistors. Which are not only ones in existence, but!

You got me !

In whole thing, it is important how transistors are working?
You have nothing else to say??? Wow!

And the operating principle of Floyd free energy device is secondary
or non-important thing.

Yea, I understand.

Ever heard of relays? Or anything mechanic to do the job?
You can connect wires with your hands and never use anything electrical,
if you can do it 50 times per second you will be fine.

I was talking about the principle, you can use whatever you want to switch,
connect/disconnect wires!
It is your choice.

I was expecting gems like this, but this overruns most of gems I heard.

Good luck with that kind of thinking.

Anyway I wont be talking anymore about Floyd because I can see where it goes.

I was thinking that this forum is about finding new, fresh ideas,
but all it is about suppressing everything new!

It was an error and mistake to wrote any new idea here,
only mumbling is allowed, I can see that now.

[AreYouSure?]

1. You can change enclosed area of conductor in
magnetic field by rotating conductor like is done
in electric generators.

2. You can change enclosed area of conductor in magnetic
field by switching between points of coil reducing or
enlarging exposed coil area while coil is stationery.
Just like Floyd did.

Both methods change exposed area of conductor in
magnetic field which results with current flow.

Faradays law.

There is no current until you start to switch as I stated.

After you switch alternately, reducing and enlarging the
surface are of copper, current will induce and flow
through closed path at the time, depends which switch
is closed at the moment. Faraday.

But more important is as Carroll stated to determine
will and can the current driven transistor, bipolar, operate
if there is no current in a wire.

If  transistor is driven by the external driver like
Floyd did, it can open and close even if there is no current
in the wire to switch, but ok.

In this case transistors do need external drivers to switch and
start the process.
Initially there is no current in the wires, coils, so external
transistor driver is needed.
How much that driver can spend? A little to drive few transistors,
very little.

Until next time when you will be interested in principle more
than in fogging!
See you!

[citfta]

AreYouSure,


I did not say there was anything wrong with the principles you have shown.  In fact I think that idea might be worth investigating.  I was merely trying to point out that transistors are not a good fit for this project.  Your relay idea is certainly worth trying to see if any current can be generated that way.


Good Luck,
Carroll

[AreYouSure?]

AreYouSure,


I did not say there was anything wrong with the principles you have shown.  In fact I think that idea might be worth investigating.  I was merely trying to point out that transistors are not a good fit for this project.  Your relay idea is certainly worth trying to see if any current can be generated that way.


Good Luck,
Carroll

Actually I tried with reed relays first, but Floyd made his device with transistors,
so they should work.
He was driving his transistors with external driver, can not remember which type
was the driver, and driver and transistors are not the point.

Point was, and is how to harvest static magnetic field from magnets,
without moving parts.

I read the Floyds Nothing is something carefully and I was familiar
with slide wire generator principle from before and saw at which
concept Floyd was pointing.

Changing surface area of copper inside static uniformed magnetic field
was his point.
That is why he is having 2 coils inside magnetic field of magnet.
Shorting first and alternately second coil, he was getting effect
like the only one of the coils is present in magnetic field,
and alternately both of coils are present in magnetic field,
which results in induction in coils and current flow.

For the first time it is weird concept, but when you think
for a while, it becomes natural.

Read his Nothing is something and you will see for yourself
that Floyd is circling around that idea of changing geometry,
or simpler said changing how much surface area of coils
are exposed to magnetic field without moving parts.

I used reed relays 200mA, 400V, can switch up to 400 Hz (1kHz?),
I drive it up to 400Hz, didnt try more,
and is isolating driver side from circuit, so driver side can not interfere
with scope shoots of circuit.

Reed relay  1KHZ_SIL05-1A72-71D , cheap one.
Can be drived directly from mosfet driver IR2110,
which I use.
Output of IR2110 through resistor 1kohm to reed relay,
and it works like charm.

So, idea is harvesting static magnetic field of magnet
by changing the surface area of coils exposed by
shorting coils alternately at certain points, just like in the picture.

In sliding wire generator concept, wire is moving and exposing more
and more coil to magnetic field.
Sliding wire and resistor (on picture) is making closed circuit while
rest of coil is not.
Rest of the coil is not visible to magnetic field, only shorted part,
thats the point!
By shorting the coils at some point we can control how much of the coil
is exposed to magnetic field!

You can see that in rotating electric generators.
If the load is present and circuit is closed generator you must use force to rotate it!
If the load is not present and circuit is open force needed to rotate it is small!
Only closed circuit is visible to magnetic field and rest is NOT!

AREA ENCLOSED BY THE CIRCUIT CHANGES IN TIME - read the yellow in the picture!
It doesent matter is it sliding wire or 2 switches switching alternately,
area enclosed by the circuit will change in time in both cases and
induction will happen in closed part of circuit and current will flow
through resistor!

In that concept sliding wire can be replaced by 2 switch at certain points
and switching alternately could yield same effect as sliding wire between
those 2 points which will result in induction just as sliding wire does.
And there is no moving parts.