Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



All Permanent Magnet failed Prototype

Started by Lunkster, August 27, 2020, 11:43:48 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Lunkster

Hi,

I have watched the video's on switching of permanent magnets that have been posted.
I am looking for a permanent magnet switching sequence that will have the least force to create the switching action for the Three Layer Mechanical Movement Technology.  In the design of the drawing, the switching magnets stays at the same distance with the stator permanent magnets.  The switching magnet stays at the same distance from the stationary magnets on each side of it as it slides into and out of the switching position where the rotor permanent magnets will be traveling perpendicular to the  stator assembly.

Again there will be some resistance in the mechanical switching.  So again the big question is will there be more force needed to perform the switching than the forward torque of the rotor assembly?

Lunkster

Lunkster

Can a failed prototype become a working prototype?

I attached the same drawing in two different format because different people
have their different ways they want to see things here.

The reason I am working so hard to find a way of moving a permanent magnet by
other magnets in a switching configuration for the
Three Layer Electromechanical Movement technology
is because if the repositioning can be done with little effort, the
rotor would move perpendicular to the stator assembly without external energy.
This would be a working "All permanent magnet motor"

The design seems to me to be unique to other motor designs,
But that very well could be because it is a bad design approach in the first place.
I can accept that. 
The concept of mechanically moving permanent magnets on the fly
does create an expensive, high maintenance motor assembly hard to control
having safety issues if it wants to run all the time.

Maybe I should concentrate on using this technology with electromagnets in the stator assembly performing the switching.
With the 5:1 PM:EM torque motor using the modified tank circuit to capture and reuse the back EMF should be my focus going forward.
After spending so much time and money in the design and build of the prototype motor I built, makes it hard to drop working on it completely.

What do you think?  Should I stop working on "All Permanent Magnetic Motors" using permanent magnets for the switching?

Lunkster