Lords of the Ring

[MeggerMan]

@Wer,

to me the third drawing should be the one  everyone should be using
because the three signals are in jected in to the ring from difrent angler points 
these tap points will inject the signal in 2 directions at the same time.  am i wrong?

Yes, this is a more simplified drawing and I can see that direction of current travel on the mobius loop (tuning capacitor?) is going to be different too.
Certainly if it is an antenna then the connection point will be important.
From my experience with designing & building PCB microwave (2.4GHz) antennas, even a difference of 0.5mm can make all the difference.

I wonder where wavewatcher went?

Rob

[gn0stik]

@ wer
Please remember, if you do this to test "opposing signals", there has to be two thing, or it will not work:
A.  Identical signals (same exact frequency)
B.  Each with it's own source.  If the same source is used, it will not work.   

Cheers,
Bruce

This is untrue. What do you base this on? Same frequencies at the same amplitude will only result in signals adding. You will get nothing but standard results, as the output will be nothing more than the summed input. You have to find the cct potential. In other words there has to be asymmetry. Without asymmetry there is no potential.

By the way, the third is only a simplified wiring of the second. If you look at the last posting of robertos latest ECD, that's exactly how he did it. The control is tapped directly to the collector like this.

[c0mster]

That last new drawing I just seen looks like a much better setup and is exactly what I was talking about in my video. Running the HV into the collector. I think now we need to use the frequencies to tune the collector to have a charge separation between the 2 collector wires. This charge separation on the collector would mean the collector is like a capacitor and thus should provide DC on the output with a partial frequency. Or another way to look at it would be that 1 ring of the collector is electron rich and the other collector becomes protonic or of + charge, the connection of the 2 collector rings would be the same as a static charge. I will be testing a new tpu setup this weekend pulsing each coil independent with the secondary HV connected to the bottom collector to test this theory.

Good work GK

Cam

[giantkiller]

On another note!
Now I am really pissed...
This article talks about wireless energy with no mention of Tesla! The man who found this science and accomplished this over 100 years ago. His demo, not experiment!, lit multiple, large bulbs in a neighboring field 50 feet to 25 yards away. HellOOOOOOOOOOH.
This article goes on to say that they can only light a 60w bulb a few feet but that they, with their pompous, thieving extrapolations are the founders reinventing old science. Assholes! And the same to the status quo that buys off on these learned monkeys. Now academia passes out PHDs with the frequency and placidity of a blather farm. Big title, no work, all fame. Gimme a BREAK! Thou shall not steal.
http://www.gizmag.com/go/7418/

Ok, I am done now.

[c0mster]

And no mention of how much power they are wasting in the Transmitter.