Lords of the Ring

[giantkiller]

With greastest regards to the others mentioned we have gotten results at the far end of the realization spectrum.
I will portray in order...
Jason's or Otto's 50 turn coil produces kicks. It is a small device for test. No emminent danger but there are kicks.
The GK4 produces kicks of greater magnitude, RE of greater magnitude, high RF and up the scale of greater magnitude. Great emminent danger. Why? Greater production with sloppy control and more complex configuration.
Otto/Roberto ECD coil contains signal and RE control to harness the operation of power control. Emminent danger exists.
Bob.rennips BEMF application control circuit attempts to gain another level of greater control. It is a simulation from what I gather. But this step is timely.
The GK4 which is a copy of the Telsa's 382282. http://www.pat2pdf.org/patents/pat382282.pdf times 3. Each layer/ring/collector is pulsed in parallel by each segment/control coil. It is using the BEMF to enhance the bucking effect.
Onto that add Otto's Mobius configuration. This proved the mobius connection was neccessary for this type of configuration.
Now I notice the 390721 patent is coming back around. What works always travels though time.

The sloppy iron windings actually create wings or sharp bends in the 30awg which point out to the feedback. This makes a hap-hazard RE connection because the edges do not align consistantly with the feedback. Plus the feedback has no corresponding edge for reception. The mag field is just perturbed randomly. So sad but great test.
Now the wing edge reappears in the ECD in a smartly defined single edge. I am impressed.

So what I see is a suggestion being given to the groups. The suggestion being actuated on and a proof being made by someone in the receiving group. That proof then appears somewhere in the future for the next step to create the next level of a proof suggestion platform. All with no great fanfare because we don't seem to catch on that quick until later on.

There are alot of electrical tests being made. I see more results from my tests when I approach the beast from a visual and wave or field generation aspect. Electrically I see alot of tests that can't prove or gain the attention of an advanced step. But that is not to discredit anyone or anything they have done. It just proves how Tesla's mysteries have held so strong until now.

But the predominant factors still stand the test of time. And that is smack the copper faster that is can respond/conduct, Kicks, BEMF, Radiant energy, Magnetic fields.

--giantkiller. TPUs: the breakfast of champions.

[giantkiller]

It is Tesla's birthday.
He would have been 152.

[turbo]

 

[giantkiller]

I have another test concluded.

Setup artifacts are
I have 2 scopes, total 3 traces, an amp meter at the power supply, +12vdc applied, 3 frequency counters.

Mechanical artifacts are
I put a brushless 12vdc fan on the FET board at the opposite end from the power supply connections. I have no caps on it. This did enable me to do initial hookups and power ons without blowing fets. Correction from last post is I have not damaged any components as of yet.

Electrical results are
+12v in, 50pp out on the ECD Zero line using 1st freq 40khz, 2nd freq 20k, arbitrary as mentioned by Roberto in the ECD doc.
Current consumption is 20ma with 2 fets or 3 fets. Added 3rd freg of 5k and no change in results.

Operational artifacts are
the fan injects noise into the gate firing so I have false triggering. At the wave section in fig 12 of the ECD doc there is the RE start. The signal I have at that point shows a slight DC rise. The potential does not subside so I don't get a spike. The thermal characeristics are almost nil. The coil and the fets used to get hot. I now have achieved on average 10% and lower duty cycle for all 3 FETS. I have the MAX621 FET driver on the clock board with the required caps at VCC and ground with 6 inch leads to the seperate FET circuit board. I also have 10k resistors for pull down on the gates to facilitate faster off time. 1ks were suggested. I want to preliminarily reduce any extra avenues for current problems. I now work backwards to optimize the circuit. Not a big deal. This baby runs way cool!

Ongoing atempts are
I don't need the fan so I will remove and attach a seperate power supply to it. I will leave the remaining tests in a cooling environment.
I am now progressing to the smaller footprint FET boards for the application of internal insertion into the coil. There will 4 boards. 4? Deal with it. Each board will look similair to Roberto's trinary Fet setup. There be a FET, FET socket, an 18 pin low profile socket, Max621 ic, a nylon terminal block, I am looking for mini coax to connect signal to gates.

Foreseen achievement is
With the elimination of noise I can see the RE show forth.

RFC on any directions I am taking here.

The excessive potentiometer count is 4 channels of frequency and duty cycle adjustment.
The other circuit spread across the table is the dual 4 bit ring counter to tip41 motor drive that drove all the previous coils. It still rumbles. I got MOSFET and BJT modules now.

The current setup sure is shweet!

--giantkiller. Divide and copper...

[nong]

Very nice scope...

Looking for your experament.