Lords of the Ring

[Loki67671]

aether22............and anyone else, have a look at this "ugly" contraption. We are not making production models so don't worry about pretty devices at this point. Lets make them work and understand it....then we can do a nice paint job....you are actively investigating phenomena.........Loki........

Oh yea.....that picture is the prototype transistor in 1947. Photo credit to whomever it belongs to. If anyone has heartburn with me posting this photo I will delete it.....Just let me know.

[giantkiller]

@Loki67671,
Stop! The control coils are supposed to be in segments. There are 3 or 4 per layer. GK4 uses 4. There have been some posters use 3. The latest posts support 3. I got good results from 4. I am heading towards the control coil sequential sequencing of a 4 segment unit. This test should add the rotating field consistantly.

--giantkiller.

[giantkiller]

aether22............and anyone else, have a look at this "ugly" contraption. We are not making production models so don't worry about pretty devices at this point. Lets make them work and understand it....then we can do a nice paint job....you are actively investigating phenomena.........Loki........

Oh yea.....that picture is the prototype transistor in 1947. Photo credit to whomever it belongs to. If anyone has heartburn with me posting this photo I will delete it.....Just let me know.

It's the boys at RCA! Giant tweakers!

--giantkiller.

[edo]

Unfortunately I've not been able to follow all the messages because of delays in getting Internet connections to our new house -- apparently someone crushed the communications and cable-TV conduits during the build and we have been "off air" for quite a while, and for some time into the future.

None the less, here is something I just realised and would like to share.  (Hopefully I'm not being too redundant.)

Consider signals S1, S2 and S3 with frequencies F1, F3 and F5 respectively.  Let those frequencies be harmonically related, for example, as fundamental, third harmonic and fifth harmonic respectively.

Generate signals S1 (at frequency F1) such that it will cycle (i.e., rotate) around the loop.  This is easily done, for example, with coherent sine-wave and cosine-wave component driving 4 independent coils.  Of course, other configurations with different numbers of coils are possible.  As the sine and cosine wave progress over time, we generate a rotating magnetic field vector.

Now consider adding S2 (a 3rd harmonic of F1, for example) to the mix.  Ensure S2 is synchronised with S1 such that the S2 will rotate with its synchronised sine and cosine components in the same direction as S1.  And finally, consider adding S3 (a 5th harmonic of F1) to S1 and S2, taking care to maintain sychnronisation of waveforms and, thereby add to the rotating magnetic vector.

Given the above, if we match the amplitudes and phases correctly -- see any EE textbook on amplitude and polarity of harmonics of a square wave -- we now have a near-square wave rotating magnetic field vector.  When one thinks of this, it (at least to me) is astounding because square waves have very abrupt leading and falling edges!  These high-gradient zones are where things happen for extracting/creating the vacuum-energy/negative-entropy.  Think about it: This agrees with so many pioneers' and researchers' works and results in these fields.  But it gets better.

If one uses two square waves for S1 -- in the same relationships as if they were sine-wave and cosine-wave -- and one then adds S2 and S3, in like fashion, now one can create very-abrupt edges on the rotating magnetic field vector.  Accurate synchronisation of S1, S2 and S3 is critical to creating the abruptness.  These very-abrupt edges can allow for even greater extraction/creation of vacuum-energy/negative-entropy.  I believe Tom B' and John B' (and many others) would be so proud of Steven -- yet another method to "tap" into the background energies that have been, and are, there all the time.

Well, that just my "two bits" worth.

Cheers,
Ed

[giantkiller]

Consider signals S1, S2 and S3 with frequencies F1, F3 and F5 respectively.  Let those frequencies be harmonically related, for example, as fundamental, third harmonic and fifth harmonic respectively.

Generate signals S1 (at frequency F1) such that it will cycle (i.e., rotate) around the loop.  This is easily done, for example, with coherent sine-wave and cosine-wave component driving 4 independent coils.  Of course, other configurations with different numbers of coils are possible.  As the sine and cosine wave progress over time, we generate a rotating magnetic field vector.

Now consider adding S2 (a 3rd harmonic of F1, for example) to the mix.  Ensure S2 is synchronised with S1 such that the S2 will rotate with its synchronised sine and cosine components in the same direction as S1.  And finally, consider adding S3 (a 5th harmonic of F1) to S1 and S2, taking care to maintain sychnronisation of waveforms and, thereby add to the rotating magnetic vector.

Given the above, if we match the amplitudes and phases correctly -- see any EE textbook on amplitude and polarity of harmonics of a square wave -- we now have a near-square wave rotating magnetic field vector.  When one thinks of this, it (at least to me) is astounding because square waves have very abrupt leading and falling edges!  These high-gradient zones are where things happen for extracting/creating the vacuum-energy/negative-entropy.  Think about it: This agrees with so many pioneers' and researchers' works and results in these fields.  But it gets better.

If one uses two square waves for S1 -- in the same relationships as if they were sine-wave and cosine-wave -- and one then adds S2 and S3, in like fashion, now one can create very-abrupt edges on the rotating magnetic field vector.  Accurate synchronisation of S1, S2 and S3 is critical to creating the abruptness.  These very-abrupt edges can allow for even greater extraction/creation of vacuum-energy/negative-entropy.  I believe Tom B' and John B' (and many others) would be so proud of Steven -- yet another method to "tap" into the background energies that have been, and are, there all the time.

Well, that just my "two bits" worth.

Cheers,
Ed

And a very worthy '2 bits' I might add. Precise frequencies are in the works.

Welcome to the club.

--giantkiller. Its not what we 'do' but what we 'can see'!