Lords of the Ring

[giantkiller]

@Moab,
What happened to the schematic you posted?

--giantkiller.

[AhuraMazda]

from http://www.stralingbewustzijn.nl/schone-energie/index.htm
.
.
.
Siehe Zyklonengenerator:

@Michael
This site you pointed at is excellent. Also I think "Oszillator mit zwei Beschleunigungsspulen" definitely sounds credible. I however can not find what you described on the link you posted. Where is it?

AM

[Spherenot]

@Moab,
What happened to the schematic you posted?

--giantkiller.

Do you mean this image?

[Moab]

@ Spherenot. Thanks for reposting, I must have unchecked it when i attached the smaller Neo/Magfield vid. I will have to make a better one.

@ GK. The pancake was a test. It showed me that DC currant in small amounts can be collected. Some of the purest smooth DC iv seen.
                                                                    MOAB

[giantkiller]

@ Moab,
Can we name your TPU Moab1? Trying to keep it simple.

Spherenot ask about which coil to wind. I slept on it. And this is the pattern I came up with.
GK4 shook magnets, made noise, and smacked the skies. Moab's coil then added to that making the magnet move violently. I attribute this to the open middle coil addition mainly. Previously
@mflynn44 mentioned puting power collection in the center.
@Grumpy stated that we are choking the system.
So, I am looking at the SM17 and I see the feedback windings are gone. I believe they are moved to the center as those little coils on top of the control unit. What a better place, eh? That way part of the choking is alleviated AND the feedback is at the highest concentration of flux impact. Just off center of the wave center! Sounds pretty valid? makes frequency control easier! The 2 black caps are there also for the input for the radiant expression of this design.

My next TPU(GK6) will be 4 or 3 loops (segments?) of RG6 video cable. The copper centers will be the collectors, the ground shielding will be the controllers(4), and the center coils will be the feedback. The cost is $10.00 USD. And that, my friends, is what we want! This will be an easy test.

I then can make this configuration any diameter, single loop each segment in only an hours time.

The parameters specifically tied together are the diameter, the height distance of each loop from each other, the 2 freqs, and the 2 coil specs( I bet they are close) for resonancy of the 2 frequencies(because they are close).

So, Spherenot, the answer to your question is once you have your 555s up then here are 3 answers, the later being the most expediant and of least cost in monies and labor. And a quicker bench check for your circuit while showing you results. And if this produces more power then plz be safe.
Otto got heat & sparks, I got heat & shook magnets, Moab got sparks & threw magnets. I was the ony one that didn't drive a light bulb. These devices all produce kicks. In the next appreciable step, the device should rumble.

In the GK4 device, the segments are pulsed in a verticle pattern across the 3 layers. In the Moab1 they are pulsed angularly in a 45 degree pattern. The GK4 then has one North segment in a bucking pattern against 3 dead segments. This produces no magnetic spin. But the Moab1 with the skewed coil connection essentially gives a 3 north to 1 dead segment pulsed pattern and in a rotating pattern. If you watch Moab1 magnet move you can see the spirographic dance. The magnet spins on its axis one way while traveling in the opposite direction. I also see uncontrolled levitation. I see other experiments in this arena if the magnet could be held in a static axis off central center of the coil and allowed to spin around the coil center.

I recall seeing the post that the SM15 & 17 do not spin magnets or compasses. RFC on that.

--giantkiller. My engines are revving...