Lords of the Ring

[innovation_station]

.

[Jdo300]

Hi IS,

I do agree with you. There is a lot of information on this thread that could be misleading to many newcommers. I would, however, be very interested in hearing about what geometry you believe is the best. As far as I can tell, you seem to like the design that Turbo has made. Were you able to get any interesting effects out of it?

God Bless,
Jason O

[innovation_station]

.

[Sauron]

i for one was offinden by joe comment.
i work every day  have a wife and 3 kids, make less than 25 grand a year and because i dont have a degree in electronic  does not make  me a less a man.

thanks
wer

hi, maybe it is safer for you to wait untill they reach the surface and you can buy one thats safe, maybe even be alot cheaper too.

you now own yourself a wrong tpu form all the missleading garbage around here

is TEAM!!

i am continiously repeating Steven the inventor his own words....not mine ,do you really think he is misleading us?

@ sauron remove my words from your quote

i think the only misleading garbage around here is posted by you....

[giantkiller]

hi is
thanks   if you belive in the tech then hang in there.  
thanks to gk i have a tpu put togeather  i will post a picture  when i get home.  i do not have a driver board    i did ask  for some help on that, got no answer.  i have to work on this real slow  because i have no funds  so it will take me awile to build a board.  i have read all 100 pages  here, and all  47 pages of tao post, all 147 pages of sm post so i am not new to this sight.  i also have all of is's post and otto's. so i am not leaving.

so with the help from this board and othe  sites i will  have one  in dew time

wer

Hi,
A simple drive circuit would a 555 thru a 1k down to 50 ohm resistor to the controls in a series or bucking config. Put a scope on it and change the freqs. I would love to see your pics. This set up would be cheap to do if you have a scope. Other wise it is impossible. It is not whether your attempts are right or wrong it is that you tried.

The latest experiment is:
The total controller length matches the collector length or some multiple there of. Why? We are getting to match the two coil weights. Some snipping or clipping would occur. Count your turns. Why? resonance rise.
I prefer what @IS has physically because that is the config of the GK4 also. Fat collectors with low gauge controllers. It still follows Otto's circuit with the coil around the same input line. It produces kicks. I have seen this on a number of scopes around the world. And even those that don't post scope shots have said the same thing.

Look at the pvc based ring that I posted. The vertical one is a matching collector. The scope goes on that one. When you see kicks in the secondary collector ring you will have reached a resonant frequency.

I also am going to attach inline little coils that match Ottos last coil schematic. These will be placed at the control coil junctions. It has been shown to raise the kick effect in other circuits.

But I am going to wire up another ring of 14awg Easyflow stranded collector on a 4" pvc ring then 30awg collector coils. These will all match in some multiple of weight. The length only gets the mass equalization close. Snipping will occur.

@IS coil is interesting in that the multiple controller coils were all wired in a bucking config. Is was shown at one time that way. My GK4 is that way and produced hi rf and microwave. Others have experienced this also.

Parts of this experiment are really quite inexpensive to do. This will be my task for this weekend. I love the challenge. This brings everybody up to the mark.

@To all,
Avoid the noise and be cool. We have no respectful leaders at the helm.