Lords of the Ring

[Cavetronics Labs]

"Mannix did once say he thought it might be an analogue computer trying to resolve pi. "



and how long for it to take to compute before we would need to restart restart it again.

LoL8

[Thedane]

I have just recently bought two new signal gens. I cant take the chance of burning them up too. So it has came to mind to opticly isolate them from the circuit completely. Optic transistors and highly bright led's should do the trick. That way I can supply the fets with what ever voltage I want seperately from the trigger levels of the gens.

I would suggest an HCPL-7840 if you want to galvanic isolate between the generator and mosfet (driver).
http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/64644/HP/HCPL-7840.html

It "only" has a 100 kHz bandwidth, but I doubt you'll find any other isolation amplifiers with better specs.  (at somewhat affordable prices).
Don't forget to add a bunch of diodes, tranzorbers, etc. to your design - or get 1:100  high voltage probes for your scope.

[giantkiller]

@Sugra,
LOTR:1:2 post. I posted Otto's jumpers there.
I hope he comes over. That wiring diagram is priceless. The GK4 model has so many inherent safety points imbedded in it from this. The iron wire being one of the most important, and the dynamic impedance shifting the operation in and out of Q. Pure genius. He actually saved my live because I had to push the frequencies to get the TPU to the edge of runaway. It just couldn't get there. Amazing.
If you read past that post you'll see where safety became the very large issue at hand. But Otto kept pushing for copper core.
I also believe the Helmholtz coils opposing and attracting both play an important part. It is so dynamic. This thing rocks to Holy Heaven. It is like the old plate spinning balanced on a stick. Only we are going faster instead of slower. See?
Again Marco: Thanks for the www.powerballs.com. That made me dream way far out! Another amazing clue. I see the TPU spinning operation because of that purchase. And it makes it easy to explain to someone how the TPU works.

I will post more through the day as I remember some of the poigniant parts of the previous testing.

I did venture to a plumbing supply store yesterday and bought 10 feet of pvc 4"diam, sched 27-29 thinwall. They even cut it for in 1" sections. Price? $8.00USD!
I could use the same saw to put the slots in. Now I must go get a 12" ceramic disc blade for my radial arm saw. 12 cuts.

--giantkiller. Another great step.

[Jdo300]

Hello All,

It has been a while since I have posted so I thought I would give you all an update on my progress. Despite my silence, I have been very busy researching and doing experiments. Lately, I did one with an interesting coil design that I thought you all should know about. This experiment was prompted by an earlier post by Myself that I never tried, and also a recent post from Dan about the bucking Helmholtz coils. My goal in this simple test was to see which arrangement of the Helmholtz coils would give the best results when the DC fields are agitated. I have posted photos of both the coil and some (unfortunately fuzzyish) scope shots of the output waveform.

Before I go into the description of the test, here is an earlier image I posted showing the concept I wanted to test:

And here's the concept Dan was proposing:

Now our ideas differ a bit because my goal was to use the iron conductor to store the magnetic energy from the field between the two wires and release it back into the wire once the current was shut off. However, dan's idea is to produce the same field but oscillate it quickly at RF frequencies to create induction on the middle wire.

So what I did was take two empty toilet paper rolls and tape them together to make a core. Then I wound some of the red 18 gauge speaker wire (you can get it from WAL-MART in 100 ft rolls) on the core, about 40 turns total. Next, I took some 22 gauge magnet wire (the kind you can get from RadioShack in the three-packs of magnet wire) and I wound that stuff in the gap between the two speaker wire conductors, just like in the picture.

I did several tests with this coil to determine weather opposing currents  in the wire (to make the radial field) or parallel currents would do the job.

For my first test, I connected both of the speaker wire conductors in parallel and tied one end to the positive voltage from my DC power supply (set on about 10V). The other end of the two conductors were tied together and connected to the drain of my MOSFET (IRF840), which would ground the coil back to the power supply when it switched on. I should also mention that I put a large cap (10,000 uF, 25V) in parallel with the power supply to get it a little more kick when the MOSFET was turned on.

To measure the output, I put a 2 KOhm resistor in series with the 22 gauge wire coil and scoped across that. (In this test, the 22 gauge coil acted as my center collector coil and the speaker wire conductors functioned as the top and bottom helmholtz)

For all of my tests, I used a single switching frequency of 10 kHz.

My thought was that if Dan's idea was correct, I would see the most voltage on the coil when the speaker wire conductors are wired with opposite current flows going through them, and I would see the least amount when the currents are flowing in parallel. What resulted was quite the opposite though.

With the wires pulsed in parallel, I got these massive 120V spikes on the small conductor! But it gets better, I then wired the two conductors in series (+ in one conductor, and then take the other end of the same conductor and connect it to the beginning of the coil on the other conductor). Since there were 40 turns of wire on the coil, there would be a slight phase shift in the pulses between the two conductors. This resulted in a 13V increase on my output waveform!

I should also mention that my power supply is current limited at 0.5A and it was drawing the full amount with the wires in parallel. But with the wires in series, there was more resistance; the power supply drew less current and I got more voltage in return.

Sooo surely if I got such a great increase in output for a slight phase shift, it must work AWESOME if I have the currents phase shifted by 180 degrees right??

Nope.

When I had the coils connected opposite each other, I got a big fat nothing on the output! This completely contradicted what I was expecting to see!

When I had the setup wired in parallel, these pulses were extremely thin in width. With my scope, I measured the pulse width to be 800 ns. I didn't measure the rise and fall times but I am certain they had to be down in the 10s of ns.

I don't think that what I was seeing was regular induction though. Because I only got the large spikes on the coil when the MOSFET disconnected the ground from the speaker wire coil. I did not get a large spike when the current was first turned on. This seems to be contradictory to what Mr. Mark was saying, but if you think about it, you can create a radiant energy event on both the rising and falling edge of the pulse.... More to come.

So my conclusion, based on this test, is that a DC field in attraction is what we want. If we use the control coils to agitate/swirl the DC field, we can produce many voltage spikes on the center collector. Take three frequencies and mix them so that they produce lots of harmonics, and you will multiply the kicks that show up on the collector.

God Bless,
Jason O

[Grumpy]

Has anyone ever found any account of RE manifesting without a capacitor present?

I have not found even one.  The two accounts that were documented before Tesla's work both depicted a capacitor across a spark gap.  (Free Energy Secrets...book)  Tesla used a capacitor between the generator and the disruptor.  Bedini = capacitor.  Edwin Gray = capacitor.

I think this is of great significance.