Acoustical feedback energy system

[Willy]

Aleks quote
"I think you do not have a keen eye and can't relate knowledge of physics to what you are seeing. That's your problem. Educate yourself more, there's plenty of OU information and believable videos on YouTube, you just have to be curious. Electrical perpetual motion machines is a fact. E.g. Bedini or TPU is so old school today. "
End Aleks quote

...

You may of course, think any stupid thing you wish.
I am not here to tell you what you should think or not think.

I know over unity devices exist, because I have seen it for my self, first hand, in real life.  But also I understand the principles by which some can function.

I also Know that Out of the many thousands of supposed self running devices presented on the internet nearly ever one is faked.  I know this precisely because I have enough physics and engineering knowledge to know this with certainty.

For you, maybe a video is enough to make you believe something is true. There are plenty of internet sites for people who want to believe something is true, even though they have no evidence to support that belief.

Before you begin speaking of evidence you posses, you should first learn what that word means.

If you are not here to learn, you don't belong here.

[aleks]

If you are not here to learn, you don't belong here.

You've missed threads. This thread is about my own OU proposition, and I'm providing reasoning behind my idea, and making relations to other devices in the field. The problem, there's no generally-accepted theory of OU, and I'm providing one based on my idea. You have no theory and you are just dismissing working devices based on absence of such theory. "Clash" or "stoppage" or "squeeze" of electric currents is a very simple idea, and once you get it (to do so you'll have to admit existence of discrete aether, with particle sizes on the order of 10^-25 meters), you start seeing the physics of devices presented on YouTube. There are many fakes, especially very popular ones, but also there are real devices, usually quite niche videos.

[Willy]

Good.  Its good to stand up for one self. Just remember that this isn't about any of us
pretending to be better than anyone else or deserving more than others.

Over Unity .com is an an open source community and the only way this works is when
we all do our best to respect each other.

[aleks]

After a bit of thinking and "mind experiments" I've came to the conclusion that during the outlined "squeeze" the energy comes from collapsing free electrons. The amount of energy released should be in tune with E=mc^2 and the mass of electron. Why they are collapsing? This requires "new physics" to explain. In my understanding, an electron is a spherical electromagnetic wave akin to yellowish-orange ball lightning (if anyone saw it); Tesla coils sometime produce transient ball lightnings which demonstrates mechanics of sphere formation. The reason for electron collapse is loss of symmetry due to compression arising from opposition of electric currents/fields.


That's mechanics. But more importantly is that aether has infinite energy on cosmic scale. It's an open question IMO where "free electrons" come from. It's very likely they are constantly formed and collapse "for free". If not for this, electronics in deep space missions would fail pretty quickly. Also note friction processes that produce "static charge" - but which never goes over some amount: formation of electrons stops at some point.


So, in OU we are taking a natural process of electron collapse under control. But the supply is limitless.

[stivep]

Over Unity .com is an an open source community and the only way this works is when
we all do our best to respect each other.

Dear Alex and Willy.
Yes you are right Willy, but  open source  is unlikely appreciating all garbage to be thrown there.
Talking about respect. what kind of respect do you have to this forum,  members, guests, and other readers?
Какого Чeрта -эта, вся  «ерунда», «чепуха», «глупости» «нелепость» здесь имеет место,  вам это нужно?
Perpetual motion, overunity OU, ether/eather is a nonsense.
It looks like  you both manifest not even a basic knowledge  in physics typical to an average 12 years old from Western European high school.
Where did you come from ?


_____________________________________________________

"squeeze" the energy comes from collapsing free electrons. The amount of energy released should be in tune with E=mc^2 and the mass of electron.
// aether has infinite energy on cosmic scale//
So, in OU we are taking a natural process of electron collapse under control. But the supply is limitless.

Please  explain:
_{1. -how  you are "squeezing" collapsing  free electrons and what for - explain entire process.?
2.- eather  infinite energy in cosmic scale?- prove it based on  current modern physics
3.- how  E=mc^2 and the mass of electron is related to releasing energy (in your case), and how we personally can use this energy ? - explain entire process.}
Proving  the answer  to that,  will double the  $1000  = 82275.65 Russian Rubles  offer  from below. making it $2000  per  each of you.

_{4. Prove me that  the nonsense  you formulated  in the quote from above according  to physics works  in energy
extraction(conversion)  process and we can use it to power our appliances,}
- and I'll give each one of you two $1000  = 82,275.65 Russian Rubles or more.

That in total makes $3000= 246,827.42 Russian Rubles per each of you.
If any of the points in all questions and concerns is or becomes   invalid than entire  offer of mine  becomes  unavailable to  you two. 
or maybe all of this  nonsense is to collect  more counts on comments here in hope to become Hero member in nonsense.?

_{Note :
Word invalid =  invalid argument
However  money is available only under condition that:  official physics (-as of today) stand point is in agreement with entire  explanation  you provide  exactly to the points
listed above and text of quoted comment.
Denying any or all of the points to make it  in agreement  with physics doesn't make you the  defender of your claims nor rewarded.
https://web.stanford.edu/~bobonich/terms.concepts/valid.sound.html#:~:text=Invalid%3A%20an%20argument%20that%20is%20not%20valid.%20We,and%20invalidity%20apply%20only%20to%20arguments%2C%20not%20statements.}

Wesley