Freedom Cells

[Temporal Visitor]

Wouldn't it be better if we just stop the innuendos, political play, banding and side shows and just get a gov in place that follows the oath? You know, the one that is supposed to serve the people and not the people serve the gov?


When does the shit stop?

Yes, it would be better.

Unfortunately finding people who are not morally and spiritually bankrupt to fill offices of "gov" is not an easy task. Those with those qualities/attributes tend to prefer to not get dirty working with the shit that is already all through the powers that should not be who are already slopping themselves at the public trough, with no intention of stopping.

"When does the shit stop?" = When good people stop VOLUNTEERING their support of others/institutions they find to be shit.

https://www.losthorizons.com/Newsletter/DiscourseOnVoluntaryServitude.pdf

"Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials  shall  be  subjected  to  the  same  rules  of  conduct  that  are  commands  to  the  citizen.    In  a  government  of  laws,  existence  of  the  government  will  be  imperiled  if  it  fails  to  observe  the  law  scrupulously.    Our  government  is  the  potent,  the  omnipresent  teacher.    For  good  or  for  ill,  it  teaches  the  whole  people by its example.  Crime is contagious.  If the government becomes  a  lawbreaker,  it  breeds  contempt  for  law;  it  invites  every  man  to  become  a  law  unto  himself;  it  invites  anarchy. "  Associate Justice Louis Brandeis

https://olemiss.edu/depts/ncjrl/pdf/2009%20Steiker.pdf

Don't know where or what parts you live in - but in my world people would be smart to learn about their God given RIGHTS, including: "the right to be let alone".

[Temporal Visitor]

No Paul. It means kick out the garbage and get those who "will" fulfill their oath taken. 2/3 rds of what we call GOV, are dirty in one way or another. So there is many names on the list.

You can't work with shit and not get some on you. (Precisely why I gave up on the US "legal system" after years of study and trial experience.)

It is a filthy business.

I agree with you.

[Floor]

@temporal visitor
  Your link @
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/new-hampshire-update-dominion-owned-machines-removed-6-votes-windham-gop-candidate-machines-used-85-towns-video-report/

I clicked and read untill three links deep.

I didn't find any ecidence there.

[Floor]

(This is a repeat of a previous post)

I watched the presidential election counts / news coverage, CLOSELY for many days, as they
were unfolding.

I see exactly what you are looking at and what the graphs show.

I think your observations are accurate and your question is valid.

The curves would be very unusual for a typical election.

They are however totally in line with what would be and was
BOTH EXPECTED AND and PREDICTED DURING THE
COUNTING PROCESS during THIS election, if one was paying
CLOSE attention.

      Reasons there was a late turn around in numbers in many states.

1. For what ever their motivations / the reasons are, democrats / liberals
are MUCH more likely to vote by other than walk in voting, than are
their republican /conservative counter parts.

2. The above change in manner of casting of votes during this election
was amplified TREMENDOUSLY due covid19.

3. That amplification was MUCH MORE present among democrats / liberals,
because voting democrats / liberals believed (true or not) that covid19 was a
serious threat, much more so than did / do republicans /conservatives

4. The first votes counted in almost all the states, are the walk in votes.
Other than walk in ballots are counted later.

5. In almost all instances what those graphs show, is exactly these changes
in manner of voting.

6. To claim the curves are evidence of "Foul play" is to turn a blind eye to these
qualifying facts, and to erroneously DENY that the above anomalies exist, were
being observed, discussed and even predicted, among the pendants / talking heads /
experts, all during the network news coverage and on the internet during the vote
counting.

This implying that there was massive fraud is so totally unjustifiable and unfounded,
to a degree that it becomes essentially a lie.

Trumps attorneys approached more than 60 courts. Some of which where in, the judge
was Trump appointed. All but one were dismissed last time I looked.

Dismissed by the courts and many with prejudice.
This means don't bring this kind of meritless crap into my court again, or you will be in trouble yourself.

One wonders why so many Trump attorneys quickly left the sinking ship ?

It has almost entirely been IMPLIED by Trump / administration that allegation
were made in courts or that charges were filed, although they were not.

This is Trumps modus operandi always to NOT tell the facts but also incessantly and
so emphatically IMPLY that something foul is true. Too many of us are willing to simply
believe what is implied and disregard the facts.

These "foul play" implications and / or assumptions are invalid and biased and while
not in the letter of the law, massive fraud, they are in fact of their nature, a massive and
very foul fraud.

Please watch this video, and watch it objectively.

It is an entire hearing with Rudi Giuliani (Michigan)

https://www.ntd.com/programming-alert-live-coverage-for-giulianis-testimony-in-michigan-election-hearing_535189.html

Its all Trump B.S.. See for your self

      floor

[kolbacict]

Tell me,please the formula for calculating the capacity of the near-electrode double electric layer.

What parameters depends on. Not find yet. by analogy with the capacity of a flat capacitor, for example. Everything is clear and concrete there.