FREQUENCY TO ENERGY (METHOD 1)

[piplin]

At normal operation every stage should divide the current along with the frequency. Voltage is easy to manipulate. But the voltage doubler is designed to sacrifice current to double the voltage.

Lets forget about the equation at a moment and think of a simple example..
A non electrical example of what the basic idea is:

Lets say you can hit a nail to the wood with the hammer with constant rate of hits and power.
(ignore gravity down forces - horizontal hammer movement)

1) We hit the first nail. for 10 seconds.
The frequency is 2 hits per second.
Each hit force equal lets say 4 newton.
So the total force spend for 10 seconds equals 80 newtons.

2) Now lets try another nail. We divide the frequency to 1 hit per second and double the
force to 8 newton and keep it for 10 seconds as well.
The total force spend again equals 80 newton.

At both examples the nail at the end has accepted the same amount of energy. It is a closed system.

This equation can be "somehow" valid if at least photons really exist. Do they? I am not convinced yet!

Hi Shorted.
The truth is that I tried to develop something mechanically but I realized that it was not viable. At least the way I thought of it.
I thought of making a series of mechanical pulses with a series of gears and using a flywheel as a voltage doubler to lower the frequency.
The point is that as the frequency decreases, pulses of greater force are achieved but at half the frequency, therefore the power is the same.

Now, I don't know if it could somehow be achieved electrically. The OP emphasizes in capacitor capacity, suggesting a low farad capacitor, but I hardly know electronics and don't know exactly why he suggests it.

I'll keep updating what's still left and post the other method.

Regards.

[Shorted]

Hi Piplin, May I ask you, does the OP claim overunity by this technique ?
Can you contact him and ask him more info about his research ?  Did he actually build it and test it?  Or its just a concept based on this equation?

Thanks!

[piplin]

Hi Piplin, May I ask you, does the OP claim overunity by this technique ?
Can you contact him and ask him more info about his research ?  Did he actually build it and test it?  Or its just a concept based on this equation?

Thanks!

+

It is impossible for me to contact him, but I am trying to do it with another person who was working on it, let's see.

The guy claims that he gets overunity, but at no time he shows a working prototype.
This man did a few threads explaining ideas and concepts about free energy quite interesting and complex, being aware that it was a forum of mystery and conspiracy, the subject of free energy was not the main topic, it was only a sub-forum, not having many people with deep knowledge.

One thing to keep in mind is that he never tried to sell anything, and he claimed that his only goal was to spread knowledge. His method consisted of explaining the concept and from there guide the people who were encouraged to develop it:

"Well, yes, this method has worked very well for me, but it is useless to write it here, the idea is that each one, each interested party develops it and verifies it, that is the idea and purpose we seek in this matter, we do not only seek to verify that works and assemble it but justify the theory solidly, we are not for pseudoscience.

Don't wait for someone else to assemble and check it, you can do it yourself. "

[Shorted]

Hi Piplin, you did good you post this idea  and I don't want to discourage anyone from building it! But the OP is suspicious!
Non posting it at a related forum is suspicious too.
It is not very difficult to build it and test it, so without prototype is even more suspicious.
He probably was looking for others to test his idea without arguments.
What makes you think that this will work electrically, when mechanically doesn't?
This idea doesn't open any window to any source of extra energy. As I said this is a closed system with its losses.
Think about it.. You just make less and bigger packs of energy bursts, rather than more and shorter packs of the energy bursts. But at the end of time, you will end with the same (or less) energy stretched or compressed.

[piplin]

Hi Piplin, you did good you post this idea  and I don't want to discourage anyone from building it! But the OP is suspicious!
Non posting it at a related forum is suspicious too.
It is not very difficult to build it and test it, so without prototype is even more suspicious.
He probably was looking for others to test his idea without arguments.
What makes you think that this will work electrically, when mechanically doesn't?
This idea doesn't open any window to any source of extra energy. As I said this is a closed system with its losses.
Think about it.. You just make less and bigger packs of energy bursts, rather than more and shorter packs of the energy bursts. But at the end of time, you will end with the same (or less) energy stretched or compressed.

Hello.
What gives me some hope is that on a mechanical level (that I know of) there is no such thing as a voltage doubler.
You would not get (to my knowledge) a waveform equal to the ones shown above. Since we would simply be concentrating the energy of a certain time (for example 1 second) in a smaller one (0.5 seconds), and the rest of the time without work (the remaining 0.5 seconds).

In a few minutes I will post the most conclusive development that was made.

Greetings