Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?

[stivep]

answer to Ilya
PART#1

The GPS sync problem
One part should reflect the position and speed of one inertial reference frame relative to the other,
that is, the Selleri transformation [7], and the second part should be the clock rate distribution,
which makes the speed of light isotropic in the new inertial reference frame. And this is a mechanism
for replacing magic with Lorentz transformations.
He implies that Special Theory of Relativity (SRT) should be replaced by the Etheric Theory of Lorentz (ETL).
But such a replacement would be a scandal.

Dear Ilya please provide:
1. link to the article.
2. source of the article
3. time of publication
4. author  of publication
_________________________________
I will be glad if the article  is not of Russian origin but that is not mandatory requirement.

Short comment :
The GPS Clock is a satellite system that provides a very precise timing service.
The system uses atomic clocks to provide everyone on Earth with low-cost access to international atomic time standards.


The GPS system is based on atomic clock technology.

Each GPS satellite has multiple atomic clocks, synchronized to a ground-based master clock.

The GPS clock provides everyone on Earth with access to atomic time standards without needing a local atomic clock.
GPS time transfer accuracy is within 40 nanoseconds of UTC
https://timetoolsltd.com/gps/what-is-the-gps-clock/


___________________________________________________

Ronald Hutch , the inventor of the "Hutch filter"  President of ION

Such person doesn't exist and never existed:
_______________________________________
There was different person Ron Hatch
-private consultant , one of employees( officers) of Navigation Systems Engineering
he  worked  for  John Deere, utility tractor,lawn and garden equipment
one of these  who was send by  agriculture equipment company to create
NavCom    for  plant farming .
At that time  there was Selective Availability  accuracy on the order of 3 m. In practice, typical accuracy is about 15 m.
There was some controversy  about information licking to Russians building  Russian Glonass system,
He was never formally accused.
He wrote  article: Escape from Einstein
Hatch in 1995 presented data contradicting the special theory of relativity, and promoted a Lorentzian alternative described as an ether gauge theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_transformation
however
Some Lorentz Transformations are formed by doing "many" infinitesimal ones.
These will have the property of being proper and orthochronous .

If QFT is to be consistent with relativity, it should be invariant under proper, orthochronous
Lorentz Transformations.
That means we should be able to replace x with Λx at any time without changing anything.

http://hep.ucsb.edu/people/cag/qft/QFT-2.pdf

SRT is completely erroneous since it is based on the wrong kind of transformations:
they have lost the scale factor characterizing the Doppler effect. First, Lorentz considered
a more general form of transformations (with a scale factor),
but then he, and also Poincare and Einstein equated it 1 without proper grounds.
Their form was artificially narrowed, the formulas became incorrect.
This led to a logical contradiction of the theory, to unsolvable paradoxes.
Accordingly, GRT is also incorrect.
For more details, : brochure "Memoir on the Theory of Relativity and Unified Field Theory

but......( the please read summary below to understand that there is no way  to understand it as
support to  Ether.)


https://www.physicsoverflow.org/5121/infinitesimal-lorentz-transformation-is-antisymmetric
_______________________________________________

The "Hatch filter" is mentioned in publication but  patent was not found by me .
/article/abs/optimal-hatch-filter

Summary:
for  summary  please look  down below  at part#2

Wesley

[stivep]

answer to Ilya
PART#2

Summary:
Ilya was providing evidence and support to ether/eather   theory (dead now)
He was acting as comparator at some points too.
But  for comparing something measurable with a reference or standard you need to  have standard.
And even if Ilya doesn't like it  - that standard  is   SRT now.   

Comparison as a Tool  of science:
___________________
Because Eather /Ether was/is widely  manifested  in Russia
( also by some respected  there  scientists)-I gave you nonorthodox to  Russian  reality set of  different approaches  to SRT
But in my mind  banditism in Russia  - in any area including science is not kosher so you have no problem guys.

_{Banditism :  
-organized crime  typically involving the threat or use of violence. in some countries.
   Russian RF might be seen by some....  as  government structure  acting as
   the biggest organized mafia in the history  of modern  world.
   Science there is  often seen  as  "just a tool" used and abused, raped  and deformed  based  on  actual
   need of  individual rulers benefiting from  corrupted  reality.
   e.g Russian history as science of facts is  the best example of such deformation.
_______________________________________________________________
comparison- is   the one of fundamental tools of science 
but   exactly today  the new law in Russia is being formulated
stating that  some form of comparison are punished by law.
and today is a day when  starting from 1945  many countries  of Eastern Europe were enslaved  by Soviet terror  till  the collapse of soviet Union in 1990}


PhD Stephen Hicks wrote book called :
'Soviets were worse than Nazis'
<sub>https://www.stephenhicks.org/

- the response  by Russian government is not to explain and provide evidence but to  ban, any examining of scientifically valid  historical truth.
   Russian propaganda  says: https://www.rt.com/russia/504768-putin-ban-compare-ussr-nazi/

The same is  with Ether/eather..
I provided both
(the  for and the against  postulates ) for  Eather  that is dead now ,
That doesn't mean that I want to reincarnate Eather
Everything around you that is based on  SRT. is   perfectly well working and is providing evidence
of its accuracy .

With due respect to Ilya  no longer willing to be  identified  as Russian.
when we talking about - comparison in science,  we also talk about similarity -as tool of science
For me Ilya  uses tools similar to  Russian propaganda.

example:
Ilya didn't provide identity  of Ron Hatch but he used  his postulates.
Ilya didn't provide any links to any material quoted or posted by him.
Dear Ilya  almost everything I write to you is supported by links- this is  how science talks  in civilized western world
But  the most important in science is  its response to the postulates.
So  Ilya can't give us  not even  one  example of supporting evaluation of
Ron Hatch revelation  about eter/eather. - I assume


legal note: opinion expressed i entirely  my own according to constitution of USA</sub>


Wesley

[stivep]

By the way Ilya .
I'm impressed with the beauty of the house I assumed is yours and  excellent picture you posted.
Is it that cold there now in May?

Thank you Dear Ilya, and I would love to see more  of it.
Wesley

[stivep]

..

[Ilya Tsimbaluk]

Greetings Wesley.

You ask me to give a link.
Lots of stuff. which has to be translated from PDF format and manually, so I personally lose touch with the basic material that I have.
I try not to alter the material itself in any way. therefore errors. which may be here - the result of machine translation in Google.

Regarding the fact that we are arguing about the term Ether, I am only trying to make it clear that the term Ether impresses me more, because it is associated with something filled. A physical vacuum or emptiness is associated with something empty, although in fact, as shown by the worldview, this is not so. Which makes me personally consider these processes as processes in Ether.

You have a lot of equipment and an excellent system for video editing. now we have excellent sunny, albeit cool weather, which is good news.
Why am I trying to piece together evidence of the failure of relativism? There is only one reason - it is too primitive and consists in studying natural phenomena with mathematical abstraction.

The experiments that we conducted and in which, in my opinion. I can consider the experiments successful, just say that the environment itself. in which that is. what is the equivalent of power has to do with this fabric of the universe. it is difficult for me to find these epithets yet.
But the question is how it stands. that we have two kinds of interaction. namely:
Interaction of physical bodies
Interaction in the environment. in which this interaction is transferred from the potential form of energy. into kinetic form (magnetic field) and back to potential form.
From here we can say that the process itself was initiated by the physical body. as a result of which, for 1 Joule of this initiation, we could get 1 joule of work and 1 Joule in the form of a capacitor charge + Heat
For this, we use LTSpice as a process simulation.

For. to show that 2 J per 1 J was obtained, we would need to make a more accurate setting. in which we would need a high-temperature superconductor and a company in Moscow provided us with 9 meters. But there would be a lot of difficulty with the acquisition of Dewar vessels (storage of liquid nitrogen) would be difficult. Therefore, for the time being, we decided to leave these experiments.

In fact, since 2018, we have been working in order to work out the concept and physical foundations. on which our concept would have to be implemented in real devices. the main task is to create an electric motor with greater efficiency.

However, a strange question would arise - what is efficiency and what are we talking about.
we wanted to say that the experiment could be on a more perfect setup. which would allow Joel to observe the energy output more. than the standard installation. This did not quite lead him to the correct conclusion.

we did experiments. to understand the most correct conclusion to what is the impedance at the physical level and by what method the energy can be destroyed, as it happens in modern installations.

Since the search for funding involves the creation of a prototype, we decided to put superconductors aside for the time being. So now with an engineer. which appeared in my team, we plan to do an experiment in order to get closer to the electric motor itself and at the same time check the concept finally and start prototyping the device in the future. which could be demonstrated to a potential investor.

Probably move away from the superconductor and try with it. in order to show the excess of the outgoing energy in its pure form, it was necessary for that very reason. that the physics of processes is not of interest to a potential investor. He can only be interested in a working prototype. This is our focus now.

and how I speak. I have to deal with the physics itself. with which we are dealing. Because it is very difficult to explain to a representative of academic science about that. what is energy and why we have more of it in our installation.
The question with here is that initially, the usual idea of ​​charge, energy and other physical phenomena has not been rewritten for more than 200 years, although today we are debating about Ether or Physical Vacuum with its virtual particles and Dirac holes.

Work. which I am currently running is the team's enthusiasm and funds. Therefore, not everything I can do quickly and efficiently. But to put an end to the erroneousness of Einstein's ideas, I'm just trying to translate the scan from the 1991 article.