Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?

Started by TriKri, March 29, 2021, 06:27:50 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

What would happen if we lived in weightlessness or energy

Greetings, absolutely recently came across this article about Tsiolkovsky.

In 1883 in his work "Free Space", which is a kind of scientific diary, Tsiolkovsky considers the course of the simplest phenomena of mechanical motion in space without the action of gravitational and drag forces of the medium. Considering ways of giving motion to a body in free space, Tsiolkovsky comes to his most basic and most important principle conclusion that the easiest way to give motion to a motionless body (or change existing motion) is by throwing away mass, i.e. by reaction of particles thrown away from this body.

Here is what Tsiolkovsky writes in one of the days "March 28. Morning. ...Suppose a barrel is given, filled with a strongly compressed gas. If we unscrew one of its ... taps, then the gas will rush out of the barrel in a continuous jet, and the elasticity of the gas, pushing its particles into space, will also continuously repel the barrel. The result will be a continuous change of motion of the barrel...By a sufficient number of cocks (six), it is possible to control the gas expulsion so that the motion of a barrel or a hollow ball will be completely dependent on the desire of the person controlling the cocks, i.e. ...The barrel can describe any curve and according to any law of speeds...The change of motion of the barrel is possible only until all the gas has not left it...In general, uniform motion along a curve or rectilinear non-uniform motion is associated in free space with a continuous loss of substance (support)".

The work "Free space" was first published in Volume II of the Collected Works of K.E. Tsiolkovsky. Tsiolkovsky by the Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1954 (pp. 25-68).

From there, I'd like to fantasize a bit about the next topic - suppose we have space about something.

Suppose we have a space in which there is no Earth's gravity. This is roughly how it would have been in Tsiolkovsky's reality.

From this comes the natural question, what would happen if Michael Faraday lived under the conditions of Earth gravity. would he be able to spin his machine in the form of an oscillator in weightlessness?

Obviously, the moment Faraday would have tried to spin the knob of the generator, Faraday himself, as well as the conditional stator, in the usual Earth sense, would begin to come into motion. only Faraday and the Stator would begin to spin in opposite directions.

This position is not only logical, but also tested experimentally.

But when it comes to the Cosmos. it begs the question, what is the reason we have to do work? We need to remember the formula for work. A = F*s. Work is the movement of a load over some distance. But why do we have to exert a force?

The reason is that in science it is correct to call it doing work to overcome friction forces. The reason is that some friction is counteracting us and mathematically it should be called -F as a force of counteraction.

We apply a force F to overcome the counteracting force -F. But the question may arise here, if the body is on an inclined plumb line, then the reason is exactly that there are two equal forces acting on the body, the force of Gravity and the force of Friction equal to it, which prevents the body from making the movement. The force F= -F. But if we move a load on some surface. then it seems logical to imagine that in the beginning, when we made the dynamic process, we also applied a counterforce from mass or inertia. further, as soon as the body has passed into a state of uniform motion relative to the floor, we have friction.

But here again we need to touch the subject that, according to the experiments conducted by Joule, overcoming the forces of friction and the work to overcome these forces must be accompanied by the release of heat and deformation in the process. Then we should write the formula thus A = Q = F*s

But it is necessary to note the following detail. At the moment of the work of moving the load along the floor, let's call a part of the Earth plane the floor as a support, can there be a friction force in the direct sense of the word?

For people of past centuries, now the 21st century, just such notions might have made sense. After all, it is unclear what could be resisting or exerting a counteracting force that we have to work to overcome. But the force of friction. as other forces bitten by subjective perception in mechanics cannot themselves have the properties of touch, friction, walking or other qualities. We should refer to the fact that it is not friction or process that opposes us, but the support, the floor on which the body moves by touching through an intervening medium that is electromagnetic in nature. The best epithet for understanding right now is just the intermediate medium.

So - we are not being counteracted by friction or other things as a verb. We are being counteracted by the physical body. But the relationship of the body that we move has a relationship through this intermediate medium. so the plane or support begins to deform and experience force from the load as a physical body.

But we live in an environment where there is some plane or support beneath us. If we are accustomed not to observe that it is not some ephemeral friction that resists us, but the Earth plane as a support, then could ancient people consider this plane in terms of the Cosmos, which in the main mass is unsupported?

I assume that this could not happen a priori. so we are more accustomed to consider the resistance of some force. If we are in Space and assume that we are beings whose habitat is Space, then we will have a different habitual view, just as astronauts habitually drop objects, assuming that due to the absence of weightlessness they will remain suspended in space, while the body immediately receives acceleration and hits the Earth surface, floor or other support resting on the Earth.

But now we are talking about what we are used to - COSMOS. This is our mental experiment. We turn the knob of an oscillator, which, through an intermediate medium in the form of a magnetic field, begins to communicate a force to the rotor, which begins to accelerate, while we ourselves begin to rotate. This means that by applying a force we are communicating a force with opposite signs to two bodies.  If we want to rotate the rotor handle to infinity, we will have to look for a support. let this support be the plane of the Spaceship. Its kinetic energy is such that the force to be applied to the spacecraft in the mechanical chain is negligibly small to have any noticeable effect on the trajectory of the spacecraft itself.

Thus all that will resist us is the inertia of mass. But this force accumulates in the body. This process we call momentum transfer or kinetic energy transfer. now the question stands, as in the case in Earth conditions, as in the case in the ship - were we able to consider, as observers relative to us, any motion of the ship or the Earth? Both the ship. and the planet Earth have an enormous kinetic energy compared to those kilograms. which we can imagine in our mental experiment. to see the movement of the ship, at least to measure with some super-precise experiment. we need at least to have an observer fixed in some part of space. to be in this part in our daily life is difficult for us. In Faraday's time, the topic of the observer and relativity had not yet penetrated consciousness on a cosmic scale.

But does that mean we don't have an effect on the Earth or the Ship? In either set, we do. And I personally believe in Newton's Third Law. If we apply a force, then because of the huge mass, or counteracted by a force with a different vector, we still make the body accelerate, but the acceleration itself is invisible to us.

But here's what the classical textbooks write us on electrical engineering - the work done by the generator is done as some sort of conversion of mechanical work into a capacitor charge. But here's the question - the charge of the capacitor, this is not Newtonian mechanics, this process has nothing to do with a physical body. you and I can charge the capacitor, but it will not add mass, tangibly. Newtonian mechanics and the process of charging a capacitor is related precisely to the appearance of energy in the circuit due to the curvature of space and time in the conductor area, which is what appears to us as an Electromagnetic Field.

Then the reason that makes us do work? The reason is not in electromagnetism. electromagnetism itself in the form of magnetic fields gives us the relationship between bodies in the form of rotor and stator, the relationship itself is zero in the absence of such, when we have them the bodies begin to interact with each other. This interaction we call force interaction. Therefore, because of the incomplete force interaction between the bodies, we can as in the case of a body sliding against a surface we have no equilibrium force. force that we apply.

In case we have a generator hanging in space, then through magnetic coupling we have a force interaction on the stator. which starts to come in motion storing kinetic energy when acceleration occurs.

Ilya Tsimbaluk

Greetings friends, I am in the process of developing a solid state device using the pendulum philosophy. so far I have not seen any resonance regarding the above described. But now I have some questions regarding the technical part or the doin line. which is sometimes called the delay line.

In LTSpice there are two variants of the line. One option is a perfect line, the other is a lossy line.
Now there is this oscillogram, which shows this, and I would like to say - can we trust the result obtained?

Ilya Tsimbaluk

Depending on the resistance, which apparently shunts the current, depends on the voltage. If the resistance in the circuit is 1 ohm, then

7redorbs

Dear One power,

Thank you, I am grateful for your response to my advertisements about Sankofa and Wave Guide systems, in specific to the dimensional representation of transverse and longitudinal waves.

I appreciated your comments and I read your conclusions with interest. In particular the favoring practical experimentation. I could agree but in my somewhat incubated experience of consciousness, enlightenment and the application of the arts, mystical or scientifically otherwise in inventing and creative expressions to navigate these fields - it has in fact been a proper balance between theory and practice which has yielded the most effective results.  Since one overcomes the limits of both utilising, of course if correctly, both.

With my comments which I apologise may come off as a criticism, for which they are not, but really I wanted to create some emphasis of how the transverse waves are represented in radio diagrams, which as you point out, must be incorrect for the same reasons that several longstanding 'contradictions' with transformer and transmission line termination to ground and coils, whereby the mathematical electrical 'theoretical' treatment as simulated, 'departs' from the actual behaviour of the dielectric and magnetic behaviours. For example in many of the tesla systems dielectric forms on one side of the circuit and magnetic the other.

I have some limited experience in building Tesla coils, though I would profess I have a good theoretical understanding of tesla's intention of the tesla magnifying transmitter, and it is NOT, repeat not a device simply to create high voltage sparks at a regular interval. No, that was not his intention at all, and just listening to eric dollards descripotion of the multiple loaded flat top antenna, the old military alexanderson antenna system, you can see very clearly that regular intervals were not in the mind of tesla, marconi, anyone at bolinas or RCA for at least 10 or 15 years until they'd succesfully completed removing every drop of the MLFTA and fully adopted the rhombic D. The main difference being that part of the dimensionality of the 2 wave propogation of transverse electromagnetic and non transverse non electromagnetic longitudinal wave system of tesla utilized at the bolinas site, was removed in the rhombic D antenna 'invented' by RCA.

A better word, if my perception is correct is "devolved" or "downgrade" from the "electrical stonehenge" which was Bolinas. Certainly the points I make on the traverse electromagnetic and longitudinal are in the context and in reference to this story, and the convuluted and outdated mathematics and theoretical ideas which you refer yourself, which largely contribute to the misunderstandings by pure mathematicians, physicists, chemists scientists and other so-called emanent scholars on this matter. Matter - being an ironical term for some of the implied imaginary realities, non matter realities implied by both of our aformentioned statements.

I would like to be more specific that I refer to transverse and longitudinal as the dimensionalities of transformed or translated waves in electrical circuits. There is no other context for the words or descriptions other than these. Simply speaking if it is being suggested that a longitudinal, theoretically longitudinal wave is sinsudoidal or hertzian, or electromagnetic. I believe it to be true that both myself and Tesla would have aggressively defended any such language. The longitudinal, for all aspects of the intensity of the word, to this one, means a single dimension of interface. Theoretically an infinitely flat object of any width has a single dimension of interface, or points that reach accross the entire universe. Perhaps then, longitudinal wave might be another word, before physicists camealong and started naming all their babies, etc etc,  another word like 'entangled non collapsed wave', or 'non fundamental phase collapsed dimensional wave'. In simpler just tell me wtf your talking about joe in simple terms - I mean that a wave that is infinitely flat is infinitely sharp, a sharper beam than any laser man has ever experimented or conceived of since the times of Tesla.

You might say if it were not except for a few  reincarnated JS' that might be casually passing by, to comment about it, and whymsically so, that their might not be anyone to witness a semblant interpretation what all this talk of harmonics and resonance is, and what the objective actually is. To understand the hidden dimensionality, the square of time if you will, or different dimensional interactions of wave guides operating in multiple locations, entangling themselves with pre-existing wave aetheric systems in place.

As you may note in the context I most recently describe, the desire and a scientific need arises in engineering and mathematical calculations to discriminate in some way between an infinitely flat longitudinal wave, and the two infinitely flat planes that the so-called theoreitcal electromagnetic transverse consists of.

Therefore you might refer to the longitudinal as a wave that acts in a single plane, but comprises of a matter energy exchange that is still proportional to C^2 in its many wave guide systems. Another way of saying that could potentially be an assymetric wave guide for a phase -decoupling multi-phase n/c circuit. So assymetric division of group velocities, and then the resulting star network you could form between them would create most of the 3rd order resonance harmonic waves you'd expect to see in a tesla coil.

Again, emphasis on way I refer to the transverse and the longitudinal wave systems in the way I do, it is specifically in regard to how the matter and energy is spread over space and time, whilst it is true that the measured wave is not the real thing that is the electricity, it is an effect, in the same way that the radioactive decay of radium is an effect not an instananeous cause as accepted in modern schools of science, despite ample evidence showing locality to other sources influences it. Despite the segway, I think it's important to understand that Tesla the one that invented nearly all of these stuff, and even Wheatstone who invented the 4 quarter resistance loop wheatstone bridge were 'adam ant' about a lot of the things im saying. Heaviside apparently got an insight similar to some of us 'fortunate enough' to with this kind of extra-dimensional sciencey stuff, and evidently didn't come back, painted his nails pink, and ordered chunks of granite to be delivered into his living room. Perhaps when the living totally human reality - really unnerves the self, but most of all because of the reactions of those other friendly helper folk we call human beings, that are very supportive to a 'failed buddha' like heaviside. And believe me I use the terms very loosely to avoid penalty or judgement. If more people avoided judgements they would come to much more beautiful and poetic conclusions about the science and the art. Though probably nobody was ever stupid enough to attempt to connect the wester and eastern arts together into an assembly understanding of how consciousness emerges out of these wave systems of the universe, oh, except probably the egyptians where these academic types either consciously or unconsciously have been getting all of their best ideas for thousands of years since the time of pythagoras, shamash and cleopatra.

The long standing misunderstanding about longitudinal waves, and what they could be is really a misnomer, we're interested in the dimensionality of the interactions with the wave systems that the tesla coil and other specific inventions utilising the dimension of l^2 and l^3 and t^2, or the square of time, over cuboid and square lengths provides, with the adoption of a 3rd order resonant harmonic, an nearly infinite array of different interactions with sub atomic and quantum force.

For example the spark gap of the tesla system when correctly utilized, i.e. not sparking every second in a discharge, that is not a stable TMT or what it is supposed to be. You want to see an asymptotic acceleration so that the impulse train discharges between the spark gap between the approach the dimension of l^3 of a fundamental particle of matter. Although not many people have witnessed what the increasingly hypothetical kind of effect it could be to create a machine of this kind, that quite literally divides time and space into blue and red components, I'm sure if it did exist and some idiot put it together and altered the constant of the universe with it, then it would probably look like parts of the components were evaporating a dark mist, whilst others glowed a bright white with a redish yellow circle rotating around and around in eachother, as the circuit starts to interact with wavelengths outside of our understanding, and indeed at a level that might imply tesla's transmission of thousands of horsepower 'regardless of distance', was something of an wave-guide entanglement system. but of course every good engineer and scientists knows this is impossible because of the 'dampening problem' and that 'C is a limit despite it clearly being printed as a constant to single dimensions of energy matter interaction', it says NOTHING About multi dimensional wave guide propogations of 3rd order resonance, they were taught all of these things about phase velocity to explain things away. Never an attempt was made such as the one ive made for several decades now into deep inquiry ino the truth.

It unfortunately involves being wrong a lot of the time and also relying on higher dimensional descriptions of the sqrt of i and its interactions in virtual particle systems of the 3rd order and beyond;so for this i profusely apologise. And this is on a bad day, fortunately on good days where I meditate I make a lot more sense, but not to scientists, so it is just as well I have some bad days lately. Wow, I just justified my badness choosing these devilish scientific endeavours, because its all fun and games until you open pandoras box and actually achieve some of these wild things.

Mainly - and please forgive me with saying this because it requires great patience to approach such large expansive subjects where there is so many different perceptions to concord to in order to create a useful description for those to use.

I would like to provide this for good measure; to prevent misunderstanding as my writing is not always desired by the pure engineers; I am jack all trades;

I found that the longitudinal wave isn't just a characteristic of the emitted wave, but it might be a result of concatenated 3rd order harmonic sub rare-factions at subluminal and multi-luminal velocities ofC.

I found that the transverse wave is represented incorrectly because it ignores radio waves that can be induced in the ground, and uses only overground, so it wastes half of the current.

I found that tesla is using the ground, and the spark gap as a means of electrical storage, but I notice others didn't found that the force of gravitation and other fundamental forces interact with the ground, naturally, and the transmitter or generator sitting upon it. Those informed on the matter, and familiar with the ancient buddhist saying '"Let's say you're driving a cart. If it doesn't go forward, should you whip the cart or the ox?'.

This is important civilisationally, philosophically, not just to the engineer. The single statement is enough to reveal Eric Dollards, Tesla's , Leedskalnins and other great mens work. Unfortuantely human beings are not evolved to the point to understand that imaginary things exist in real space. And the imaginary component is a dimension that interacts with real space.

This could reveal several interesting things about what the longitudinal causal or effect, or cause-effect substratum system might actually do, einstein didnt like the idea of being punched before pressing the red button, and he payed the ultimate price of being shown to be wrong in 36 different theories. Albert einstein responded correctly that it would indeed "take just one, to disprove him". Or rather, satisfying the one, to keep his mathematical solutions and insights gained. And after that his sanity.


There are probably good reasons why all this stuff about magnifying a 5 volt 40hz power supply into a 1 megavolt ray using nothing but a few inductors, a very large industrial capacitor, some resistors and the worlds best wireless in the world to achieve it without the whole thing melting down that is. As afterall, if tesla was right the entire destructive power of nagasaki and hiroshima is coming from external means. Frightening to conclude that uranium itself may be outdated, when and I am sure many enterprising foreigners have already achieved such a grand obtainment, ability to turn off radioactivity of matter at will by isolating it from the causative cosmic rays is a veritible confirmation of tesla's experimental calculations at wardenclyffe, the velocity of the elctrostatic discharge given by himself and wheatstone, which indeed if truly was 157% faster, our attention might be best directed to how we are measuring time for performing these so-called experiments that prove that light is a constant.

It would appear that it is a constant at the first order, and if the misunderstanding of the 3rd order odd resonance wave guide systems continues, I fear they're may be no rekindling of this fabric of the aetheric nothing with which all these waves travel.

Again, Tesla very emphatically wanted to create a device that could discharge huge capacitive quantities of energy into free space, or rather, in the dimension of time and space. Specifically to increase the number of discharges of the capacitoy per second of a fixed energy in farads, and a fixed energy recirculation in per farads, his circuits not only had the ability to create nearly any wave form, with an understanding of the characteristics of the art, individualisation and the fundamentals of language, signals and dimensionality, may achieve interaction at nearly any level of any system which relies on these sub entangled vibrations.

Now, whilst a lot of this is poetically given, it's hoped the engineering language, and the engineering demonstration of these wave systems can simply speak for itself, without me needing to be especially creative, poetic, academic, or scholarly. I'd really like to demonstrate to you the slurring alexanderson antenna.

Because if you can recreate a system that bends time, in 4th and 5th orders, or create star configuration antenna, you'll see this debate is a bit outdated and we should concentrate our efforts on impulse trains with an theoretically infinitely small wavelength in between discharges in the impulse train in the gap in circuits that may occur after just 4 or 5 minutes. Using basic equipment like a few 1 henry inductors, and some 15 pf, 150pf and 150f capacitors, with some resistors, a 40-120hz power supply at 5V can generate 1000's of amperes and megavolts in recirculating currents and transformation in a two transformer 4 coil system. Although these calculations are thought experiments and the video uses existing equations, simply altering the classical tesla coil wrongly created so that wave forms are able to recirculate or reflect from both sides of the circuit and between the capacitances can create a complex network of interaction that may be similar to the first succesfull simulations of the atom, of which i have been attempting to undertake since 2012, when i discovered that prime numbers is associated with several important processes that allowed me to reverse engineer some much older, almost ancient plans, ideas and architecture and convert it into a tool of the goods.

I know it all seems a bit far fetched but, I plan with permission from our foreign sponsors, to publish a complete theory and description of a 'device for enlightenment', which is really, simply, a device capable of producing wave form interactions with our consciousness, beyond our present intelligence and understandings. Therefore hence the term "Tools of the Goods" for teaching.

If only people had a dude approach, and combined it with the Dollard approach, and then added a generous helping of buddhism, christianity, and islam, a heap of grace, gratitude and love, and you'd have a key for the secrets of the universe, I tend to throw these keys at peoples doors, when they are not throwing them at mine or into my back garden.

Jokes aside. I hope the video is helpful and illustrative to some of these harmonics whereby "time flows backwards". You really have to experience and see it to believe it, so in nearly all of these statements made by our excellent friend onepower, are indicative to many of the conclusions I've made. I've found that a lack of human understanding and a proper language for engineering, science and these 'religious experience', continues to create the divions of talent and ability in the east and west that have existed for so long.

At least the 'russio-ukraine peace initiative' is going well, for want of a better word, these guys with their radio transmitters, you have to watch out for. Especially the non mechanical, organic ones!

But that would be another unwelcome thesis essay from a slightly-nuts the dude..buddha.. etc etc.

I hope the video shines some light into the accelerative nature of the systems just after ww2 that had a tendancy to accelerate the oscillations and maintain the resonance of the system. I am still tuning this demo to show the principles involved in magnifying and dividing wave guide systems in tesla coils I believe anyone who has a love of iron and wire and the mysteries will enjoy the video and find it informative.

Though I cannot guarantee it, all the schematics are original and by myself by the way, I have no idea what I'm doing. Just so you know. I'm well aware it's my biggest advantage and disadvantage. Hopefully any engineers out there that actually have been trained and told how these things work can provide some insight so we can inquire together and one of us can convince eachother more that they are more nuts, or unreasonable than the other.

I intentionally use humour to reveal suffering, sometimes though I'm just not sure if it's mine or the worlds.

Probably enough for a few weeks. I regret that my news is always so strange, hopefully it's appreciated and is enlightenment for someone. It's just a device, afterall. As the pyramid builders said an "instrument" or a "temple of man". My greatest achievement though was building a temple completely without tools, and for those folks around here who knows what it actually means and believes I'm serious in having achieved these things, hopefully will consider reaching out, because I'm surprisingly friendly for someone on this nth degree stuff. Most of them do go nuts. Because you know, its a lot.

Also occasionally I play nuts abit, because it's probably safer when your writing editorials on the density of radiaoctive materials not being a 'soul' cause for radioactive decay. And other highly highly above secret, holy shit tesla is gonna destroy an enemy army with a 5lb device, we cant even let this get on the field because it will be the end kind of crap.

Yes. Yes. I'm sorry for risking the world by revealing this kind of stuff then, but given the calamity that was coming I hope this European Indian Canadiany Ukraino-Russio initiativey thing might be some use especially with help from eric dollards guys at a52. they practically wrote the book on most of this stuff, and I owe eric a lot for spending so much time talking to me on the phone about the important research understandings of these differing dimensions in wireless and application of the tesla coil.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTrsL0e7-l8

I know nothing.
Best,
Adam

Quote from: onepower on June 06, 2023, 01:07:01 PM
On transverse and longitudinal waves.

I found the biggest difference in perception is between those who do real experiments to prove a matter for themselves and those who simply follow others.

I found there is no such thing as a transverse wave and the sine form we see on our DSO isn't what's actually happening outside a conductor or antenna. For example, if we use a stick to measure the change in height versus time of a water wave we also see a sine wave form. An antenna is no different and all we are measuring is the change in induced voltage versus time. As such a wave is not something in itself only a disturbance of something already present. Logically, we cannot have a wave in water without first having water present. However many have been falsely led to believe space is empty and no transmission medium is required which is absurd. It begs the question, if a wave is defined as a disturbance of something then what exactly is being disturbed in any given space?.

Here most seem to have put the cart before the horse which is probably why nothing seems to make any sense.

Experimentally it's easy to prove the difference between what many mistake as a transverse wave and a longitudinal wave. Place some charged ping pong balls in a tube and move them back and forth in an alternating motion. The measured internal and external voltage will change showing a form similar to a sine wave. This is what many have been fooled into thinking is a transverse wave. Now place one of the charged ping pong balls into the tube and use compressed air to shoot it out like a gun. Here we see a single disturbance similar to a Soliton or longitudinal wave. However it's not a wave it's a mobile energy carrier which has become independent of the source which initially gave it energy. This is why simply measuring a supposed wave is at best a superficial observation if we ignore everything in between the cause and effect. 

As most of the great minds like Richard Feynman implied, we can discard 99% of the over complicated things most believe and use first principals. Here is a good link, https://jamesclear.com/first-principles
It seems intuitive doesn't it?. Everyone is so preoccupied with trying to imitate everyone else they forgot to think for themselves. I felt a real connection with this article because it describes what I'm seeing. Imitation is not evolution, it's the opposite of evolution.

AC

Tarsier_79

I didn't read your post because it is too long. I did look at your circuit. Perhaps you should delete the diagonal lines and try again.