Has anyone here constructed an overunity system that works?

[Ilya Tsimbaluk]

Using the literature in which Umov was the first to put forward the concept of energy flux and density, considering the interactions of bodies through an intermediate medium, he was the first to express for the first time the need to maintain such a medium.

The most conclusive literature of all free energy cospirologists of the early 20th century had taku. the book by Gustav Mee, the translation of this book and publication was in Odessa in 1927. The name itself says that the Course of Electricity and Magnetism (experimental physics of the world ether)

And this is what an engineering company looks like from a bird's-eye view, where I did experiments in the bowels of its laboratory. The laboratory itself is located in the premises of the former bomb shelter)

[Ilya Tsimbaluk]

Now we are getting ready for experiments in order to apply the physics of processes to a real device ... These are some photos of our experiments to show the possibility of additional generation ...

[stivep]

At the same time,
I was a very talented or maybe even a genius person and
I do not feel aggression because of belonging to his origin.
I feel respect for his work.

As you saying  You Ilya ,- you may be a genius, I don't fight with that.
___________________________________________________________

_{Regarding the most conspiratorial book. which is in the public domain dedicated to Heaviside says that just in his last works. which disappeared without a trace, there are only some fragments,
Heaviside described the Casimir effect, which was repeated by Lamerow. just says that the Physical Vacuum or Ether is not empty in the minds of people, the professor argued. who, after
Umov and simultaneously with Poynting, came to the idea. that energy enters the conductor itself from the outside.}

How do the Russians know that  it was some "stolen"  work of Heaviside And they also  know that it  contained phrase:
"{Ether is not empty..}"
_{It looks  as if these Russians were trying to  say,  that it had to be  something  of value in that Ether... Wow..
Why is that Russians specifically  pointed  at that revelation, translating it likely from Russian  into  English and than back from English into Russian
and were quoting  phrases from that English version of it . as a proof of theft.
With all do respect to you and every Russian ...Dear Ilyia,  we live at civilized part of the world here...
We didn't murder Tzar with his wife, his children,  his servants, and children of his servants including  their pets  in 1918.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_the_Romanov_family
We didn't start WW2 together and cooperating with with Hitler
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov%E2%80%93Ribbentrop_Pact#:
in September 17 1939  after invasion in Finland and Baltic's countries?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_invasion_of_Poland
And definitely didn't do what Stalin did  to Russian science.}
https://www.theatlantic.com/science

____________________________________________________________________

...the idea. that energy enters the conductor itself from the outside.

I agree, it is nothing new,
( example is an antenna resonating with  energy from outside - the EM wave )
But energy type , its source and properties, and its interaction with conductive medium  must be known, to do not become
another Russian  fake story.
_________________________________________________________________________

In the video from Veritassium. in which the description spoke of what Thomson assumed. that the atom consists of
Elementary particles and these particles are part of the cathode and the electrons themselves are part of the atom
escaping from the cathode, I showed that this is a complete delusion.

NO  !!!!
and one more time NO.
This is original Thomson experiment leading to discovery of an  electron.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9Goyscbazk

the text below is:

NOT  THAT IMPORTANT BUT  HELPFUL -so you may skip it for now
Thomson also made an experiment where  anode was in one vacuumed tube and  anode was in another outer tube containing  the first one
glass is an dielectric.( look at the picture below)

The dielectric constant of a glass is the ratio of energy stored in a condenser with the glass as the dielectric, compared with the energy
stored in the same condenser with air as the dielectric.///This measures the ability of a glass to store electrical energy, and varies with the frequency of the voltage applied to the condenser 

Air is dielectric

Dry air is an excellent dielectric, and is used in variable capacitors and some types of transmission lines.

________________________________________________________________________________

So Thomson based on his experiment made  quite right answer  that

electrons themselves are part of the atom escaping from the cathode

If cathode and anode is not in that glass envelope than the electrostatic charge is deposited into:
-a dielectric  of the glass affecting also  the  outer air ( in space from source to the glass) as dielectric at first.
-and than this charge looks for your hand holding  it while moving  electrons in rarefied  leftovers in that  glass envelope.

But if you are not holding  that  glass tube ( the envelope) in your hands  than  there is a physical dimension  of that glass envelope that
according to inverse square law makes it at its closest  part  to  electrostatic charge  at potential  of  e.g 10 000V  and its far-most / farthest  side at potential of e.g 2000V only.
<sub>explanation  of it is in videos below


So  why  do the influenced electrons leave  the cathode ?
Well.. free electrons are the electrons that are  at higher energetic level jumping from</sub>
shell K to shell N and out of influence of an atom becoming  than the  free electrons.

_{Some frozen in time Russians - they rather think about Bohr  planetary model of atom so shell will be for them an orbit
and phrase from above for them will look  like:}
orbit K to orbit N and out of influence of an atom becoming than - the free electrons.
However tendency to get free is prioritized to an electron  being at outer shell as they need very little  additional energy to do it.

_{in this experiment by increasing electrostatic potential - we  are raising electrons into a higher shell till they are no longer bounded 
to an atom and becomes free electrons.
In electrical conductor these free electrons are responsible for carrying out electrical  potential measured in (e.g) eV or V} 

When an atom loses an electron,it becomes positive ion which is called cation.
You know that the charge of proton  is positive (+1) and the charge of electron is negative (-1).
Besides,we know that an atom is neutral because the number of proton and electron is in same number.

https://chemistry291.
Another neighboring atom gains that not needed  free electron and becomes  anion but often accelerated electron knocks out  electron from another  atom and takes its  place.
Every time electron loses its energy in eV it must give out something and often this is  in form of a PHOTON
In gases we often  use terminology: -  positive or negative Ion _{( instead of Anion Cation)}
__________________________________________________________________________

And now Example with rarefied air enclosed in glass envelope, having no electrodes.
At first  part of video please look only around 2 minutes:
to understand how the  electric field  looks like and why is positive there.
https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=1200

Than  please look at 2 minutes of this part of video  and think  about electric field  vector potential.
https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=2586

The likely reason of some gases to glow  when enclosed in glass envelope  under an electrostatic variable potential is

that the emitted electrons are able to move about freely from one end of the tube to the other.

https://ggn.dronacharya.info/EEEDept/Downloads/QuestionBank/Vsem/EMI/section-A/Lecture-3.pdf

But if we don't have any anode and cathode in that envelope  we still are dealing with properties dielectric of glass envelope and air as dielectric from  outside.
_________________________________________________________________________

And now what is PLASMA?

Plasma is an ionized gas consisting of positive ions and free electrons in proportions resulting in more or less no overall electric charge,
typically at low pressures (as in the upper atmosphere and in fluorescent lamps) or at very high temperatures (as in stars and nuclear fusion reactors).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_%28physics%29
It consists of a gas of ions  – atoms or molecules which have one or more orbital electrons stripped (or, rarely, an extra electron attached), and free electrons

When it becomes ionized  it often glows in visible frequency  band at its characteristic to given gas atoms color, knowing that  N ( nitrogen) is influencing this process
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50396-6

The same as  Ionosphere does due to Photons and
cosmic  ray activity

Cosmic rays (also called cosmic radiation) mainly comprise high energy nucleons
(protons, neutrons and atomic nuclei). About 90% are hydrogen nuclei (a single proton with an atomic number of 1).
They have been stripped of their electrons and so are ionised

In Ionosphere that energy is send by photos from the sun and other cosmic radiation.

Radioluminescence is the phenomenon by which light is produced in a material by
bombardment with ionizing radiation such as alpha particles, beta particles, or gamma rays.
Wikipedia

The only difference is that :
-  in Ionosphere the process   of photons depositing its energy into a mater( atoms of air) makes glowing of ionosphere .
-  in our glass tube  we are  using difference of potential between our body( hands) holding  a glass envelope  and HV variable potential  from Tesla coil.
video#2
https://youtu.be/QpVxj3XrLgk?t=2586

If we say that we have a certain closed circuit and a current is moving there, then this is just a mistake. since the luminescence of the light bulb can occur at that moment. when the electrodes are not inside the bulb.
Therefore, we must consider only the idea of ​​Poynting Heaviside about the movement of energy in space, and this space does not create charges from emptiness, it only transforms the apparent emptiness into the charge we observe.
https://youtu.be/SRCfl5pR8Kc
I showed this on alternating current and showed it on the example of pulsating direct current. where a nearby light bulb glows without direct contact.
What speaks in favor of Hertz's hypothesis that in essence it is a demonstration of Waves in Ether, Space, Environment, Physical Vacuum, call it what you want.
https://youtu.be/mGbCLJkwTMc

Conclusions:
In pure space vacuum you have no electrons and no particles  apart of EM wave(PHOTONS) that doesn't need any medium  to travel
If your  glass envelope was at  ideal vacuum  AND NO electron emitters , than  nothing would glow in it.

No matter how many names and processes you  are trying to throw into your  explanation it is just not going to help.
Your:

.. demonstration of Waves in Ether,

is just pure lack of understanding of nature  of plasma and its  behavior under  different conditions.
Your Ether doesn't exist
Nothing will glow if there is no  difference of potential.
There is no  publication of modern time admitting Ether/Eather existence.
Just find me one scientifically standing  explanation of what is Ether/Eather and what it does.

Move on my Russian friend  get out  form middle-ages  of Russian  science.. where   modern science  only started to exist.

Wesley

[stivep]

to support my post from above
here is my vacuum chamber  in one of my labs:
https://youtu.be/ISoW1yhVpjs?t=442
https://youtu.be/MIfWgX8hA4A

I have few of them not only one.
_______________________________________
experimenting with ionized  particles was done with use not of eyes looking  at  glowing  particles but with
better than eye  photo-multipliers, photo intensifiers and chambers with Triethanolamine,  as a medium. also at high  voltage.
https://youtu.be/izzujmKROWI?t=304
_______________________________________

I'm in particle physics as my  primary direction.

Wesley

[stivep]

https://overunity.com/17735/wesleys-kapanadze-and-other-fe-discussion-forum/msg557340/#msg557340
Wesley