Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[stivep]

in my response: Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL « Reply #440 on: Today at 03:30:56 PM »
I ask you to respond to unknown/non-clear to me descriptors you have used, so I can start to understand what you talking about.
Wesley
please respond to this particular post before we go forward.

1.Please  provide the link. to the picture
"interpreting 4-symetry in electrical engineering terms"
2."potential regauging,"- what is it and what do you understand by that?
3. "virtual energy flux"  - what is it and what do you understand by that?
4. " forcefieldflux"          - what is it and what do you understand by that?
5.  please explain the process of "virtual energy flux to observable energy, from seemingly nothing to a forcefieldflux"
6. please explain the role of the magnets in .5 where Magnets can do free work

please provide the answer in numerical order and in the format:
example: ."potential regauging," is .....

Wesley

[alan]

in my response: Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL « Reply #440 on: Today at 03:30:56 PM »
I ask you to respond to unknown/non-clear to me descriptors you have used, so I can start to understand what you talking about.
Would you please provide the link to the picture of yours so I can analyze article.
Wesley

please respond to this particular post before we go forward.
Please also provide the link. The picture
"interpreting 4-symetry in electrical engineering terms"
Wesley

If we're done discussing the work-energy problem.

[stivep]

If we're done discussing the work-energy problem.

No
where is your response to my questions or you rather prefer– that I need to repeat them?
Wesley

[stivep]

No
please respond to the questions or you rather prefer a need to repeat them?
Wesley

[alan]

No
response to the questions or you rather prefer need to repeat them?
Wesley

I'll repeat them: my main point was movement, work, energy that a permanent magnet adds to an object without apparent input 
and the broken symmetry of an electric dipole that's doing the same to particles: asserting a force on charges, attracting them, adding energy and movement, without the dipole being consumed. 
Gravity does the same: if a meteor enters the gravitational influence of the earth and it falls to ground, it accelerates by F=m*g, and energy is added by 0,5mv^2 and totalled by W=F*s,  energy has been added without gravitational potential  being "consumed".