Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[onepower]

stivep
You seem pretty cool but you logic and line of reason seems incoherent to me. You started on electronics and Zenneck Waves, jumped to home appliances, touched on language and economics and ended up howling at the moon. It ends up sounding like a diatribe of miscellaneous subjects having no direction or focus I can comprehend.

No offense but I have literally no idea what in the hell you were actually trying to say... it eludes me.

Regards
AC

[kolbacict]

Easy and difficult is relative...
AC

I meant it's hard to find a link to synchro1 with my ancient computer, my slow internet.
p.s. But the perpetual motion machine is also not yet obtained.

p.p.s. Are there no gold-refining vandals in your country?

[Thaelin]

stivep
You seem pretty cool but you logic and line of reason seems incoherent to me. You started on electronics and Zenneck Waves, jumped to home appliances, touched on language and economics and ended up howling at the moon. It ends up sounding like a diatribe of miscellaneous subjects having no direction or focus I can comprehend.

No offense but I have literally no idea what in the hell you were actually trying to say... it eludes me.

Regards
AC

How most threads go on the forum. How it is easily derailed into oblivion.

[pix]

   How most threads go on the forum. How it is easily derailed into oblivion.

Yep.
3 pages ago I asked question regarding diodes in Stepanov resonant transformer.
Nobody reply, but discussion went completely banana around some ambitious and personal matters.
Subject is : RLC parallel reactive current, yet discussion derails into some exotic topics .


Waiting when it cools down .


Cheers,
Pix

[stivep]

stivep
//you logic and line of reason seems incoherent to me.

my reasoning coherency is around your reaction

_{Easy and difficult is relative...
// many people who have spent a lifetime chasing this technology //Tesla, Moray, Benitez, Figuera, Hendershot
//99% of the population // delusional or misinformed about the nature of reality?.
// most get triggered and completely lose}

analysis of elements of your quote
you started with:
– involvement
– listing of unfortunate inventors
– reality of delusional or misinformed population
and ended with
– disappointment
and that does not differ much from your own comment about me:

Wesley//You started on electronics and Zenneck Waves, jumped to home appliances, touched on language and economics and ended up howling at the moon. no direction or focus //
Regards
AC

I love your comments, thank you very much.
all of those famous losers in FE had knowledge experience in agenda targeting specified goal - get/getting money.
But most of you are  disappointed critics with no background or willingness to get one.
hobbyists differ from involved scientists not much, collecting knowledge on the fly, enhancing their formative assessment,
– professionalism by choice and desire and pleasure of being, seeing, touching, experiencing despite the outcome.

real involved hobbyists are not losers. – while Joe Schmoe rather goes to Bahamas
All the rest of the guys in FE are likely just losers, total losers and/or unfulfilled opportunists.

Wesley