Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[kolbacict]

https://ferd041.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/h2e.pdf
The technology is working, but there are technological contradictions.
The magnetocaloric effect enters into a technological contradiction with thermal inertia.
p.s.
You haven't seen my toilet yet!
And it doesn't bother me at all.
You can be clean even without comfort and conveniences, and you can be a pig living in a comfortable villa.

[stivep]

video of James Schwartz's 6kW device which is grounded//
activates the circuit that automatically seeks
the local ground frequency.
"WE'RE GONNA FIND THE FREQUENCY OF THE EARTH THAT MATCHES"
You can see below it finds 9,574 Hz.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-sTrGVcOIA

Re: Selfrunning 3 KWatts ERR unit powering 3 x 800 Watt lamps  « Reply #1 on: July 27, 2009, 05:27:35 AM »Dr. James B. Schwartz
narf1933@yahoo.com  https://www.facebook.com/overunitydotcom/videos/dr-james-b-schwartz-free-energy-device/514413649045825/

Schwartz partnered with Noah's Ark Research Donald - last name "Sample" ?
not sure but much before year, 2000

____________________________________
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocA7DVRzIn0
quote from some text under video.
_{Please read it all.}

Dr. James B. Schwartz back in the '90s. made a claim that he can generate electricity from the invisible electromagnetic spectrum
//may seem like one of those scams from the '90s
That person is none other than Mr. Reed Huish
//involved in Zpower corporation

Zpower corporation
https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_az/07464881

_{ZPOWER CORPORATION Company Number 07464881 Status Inactive Incorporation Date 5 April 1995
Latest Events 1995-04-05 - 2016-08-22 Addition of officer REED N HUISH, agent 
2016-08-22 - 2021-06-20 Became inactive
2016-08-22 - 2021-06-20 Change of status from '' to 'Inactive'}

Why is that important? Well in one of the videos Dr. James B. Schwartz is presented as Dr. Benjamin ZPower Chief Engineer/Scientist.
Now that would be totally uninteresting if this video was not removed from youtube.
And Mr. Reed Huish has no visible videos on his channel anymore.
At this point, something started to bother me about this.
Therefore, I investigated further and could not find that Dr. James B Schwartz is in any way associated with the ZPower corporation.
I may be wrong about this and if anyone from the ZPower corporation wishes to make a statement about this I would be glad to accept one.

concept exists for a very long time //not introduced to the publi until 2020.
// a press release from January 23, 2020, that the company ZPower ZPower releases breakthrough solar panel that works at night.
Dr. Schwartz is not mentioned in this article.
//contact ZPower corporation, Mr. Reed Huish.//
I don't know why this news went under the radar.
Maybe because of the global pandemic.

The last part of this text from under video  :

But the fact remains, we have achieved what the great Tesla predicted so long ago.
We can create electricity from the ether as he stated.

says about ether/ eather BS. and Tesla predictions.that's for me evident we didn'y deal with scientist making this video  but some
curious digger.

_{ether/ eather BS
Overunity
Perpetual motion
all of it doesn't exist and is likely  spread by some government sponsored Russian trolls domain}
or by nix85

Feb 12, 2018James Schwartzhttps://www.researchgate.net/project/We-are-presently-building-a-one-mega-watt-Flux-Power-Generator-you-can-see-our-plans-for-our-project-by-going-to-FLUXPOWERTECHNOLOGYCOM
http://fluxpowertechnology.com/
Some interesting  info is here
https://overunity.com/7842/selfrunning-3-kwatts-err-unit-powering-3-x-800-watt-lamps/msg194369/#msg194369

I lost link to quote from below but is from overunity forum.

Like i disclosed number of times already, i emailed Schwartz 2 or 3 years ago
asking him for secret to his neutrino rods. Ofc course he never replied.
Then i wrote another email in which i accused him of stealing the tech
from Tesla and others (referring to devices such as one above, not rods)
but he misunderstood it i meant rods and this time, ego-hurt he replied
dismissing that he stole the rods, but of course never revealed anything.
It is well known he lied about "73-74 elements" just to confuse everyone,
it is of course much simpler. Altho i did not admit it to him, and he may
read this, i still think those rods are among best OU devices ever, totally
passive, no electronics, no input power, only device that might be better
is ATREE, but ATREE was waaay more complex and these seem to be
simble carbon rods, possibly one had 1 or more diamagnetic impurities
and another paramagnetic, maybe baked in high B and E fields. Maybe
also while exposed to certain RF, we can only guess, greed buried this
one like all the others.

Wesley

[stivep]

video of James Schwartz's 6kW device which is grounded//
activates the circuit that automatically seeks
the local ground frequency.
"WE'RE GONNA FIND THE FREQUENCY OF THE EARTH THAT MATCHES"
You can see below it finds 9,574 Hz.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-sTrGVcOIA

nothing that was said in the video  is at any point true according to physics.
Good entertainment for Joe Shmoe  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Shmoe
Neutrino is explained here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeutrinoGround
frequency 9,574 Hz. has nothing to do with Neutrino. and doesn't have any specific meaning.
-nothing significant about it.

video of James Schwartz's 6kW device which is grounded//

The device  on the video was not grounded, nor a device from other video.

However there is something apart from B.S of Dr "whoever"
This frequency  9,574 Hz is in the range of comfortable frequencies for Dr James Corum and my own  energy extraction from Schumann waveguide.

Q:So how he did it?
A:Magician knows his tricks.

Wesley

[stivep]

This frequency  9,574 Hz is in the range of comfortable frequencies for Dr James Corum and my own  energy extraction from Schumann waveguide.

What is the source of Schumann resonance excitation?

Lightning discharges are considered to be the primary natural source of Schumann resonance excitation;
lightning channels behave like huge antennas that radiate electromagnetic energy at frequencies below about 100 kHz.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schumann_resonances

How are signals extracted from a waveguide?

Signals are typically introduced to and extracted from waveguides by means of small antenna-like 0
coupling devices inserted into the waveguide.
Sometimes these coupling elements take the form of a dipole, which is nothing more than two open-ended stub wires of appropriate length.

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-14/waveguides/
our Tesla coil is our  antenna inside of the waveguide created from two spheres  earth and ionosphere.
this Tesla coil receives energy deposited in form of electromagnetic wave in the another waveguide called interface.
That waveguide - interface. earth/air 2D interface  -    is between :
earth  (acting as partially conducting  medium) 
and
air (acting as dielectric)
at Complex Brewster Angle,  in TM mode
note: please do not confuse Brewster angle with Complex Brewster Angle
–at complex Brewster angle, electromagnetic wave is entering interface without refraction and reflection.
2D– stands for two dimensional space, between earth and air.
Re: Wireless energy transfer experiments ,Builders board  « Reply #243 on: April 25, 2021, 03:21:05 AM »

some help with understanding Complex Brewster Angle
is in the link below however that link applies to lossy dielectric (but the mechanism is exactly the same)
- the article is talking only about Brewster angle not Complex Brewster Angle
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235108138_A_Note_on_the_Brewster_Angle_in_Lossy_Dielectric_Media
Wesley

[onepower]

stivep

Perpetual motion
all of it doesn't exist and is likely  spread by some government sponsored Russian trolls domain

If this is true can you name anything anywhere NOT in perpetual motion?.
I mean if what your implying is true then even a child should be able to name one thing not in perpetual motion.
I think it's comical because I have yet to meet anyone who has either the balls or brains to answer the question.
It's pretty pretty simple... put up or shut up.

Regards
AC