Reactive Current - Parallel RCL

[pix]

Why can't magnetism be used as a source of energy?
https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/why-cant-magnetism-be-used-as-a-source-of-energy/
Wesley

Why every BLDC motor contains permanent magnets?
Because permanent magnets makes that motor much more efficient.


Why nobody came to idea to use permanent magnet plus air gap in flyback?
Have no idea.


Cheers,
Pix

[alan]

Why can't magnetism be used as a source of energy?
https://engineering.mit.edu/engage/ask-an-engineer/why-cant-magnetism-be-used-as-a-source-of-energy/
David Cohen-Tanugi, vice president of the MIT Energy Club and a John S. Hennessy Fellow in MIT's Materials Science and Engineering department
Wesley

Would this work?? 
a coil on an iron rod: electromagnet.  energy is stored in the coil after magnetizing and released as current during demagnetizing. Energy magnetizing=demagnetizing. 
While it is magnetized and the field is there, it pulls an iron piston: work done. Magnetic piston means Lenz   
Does this decrease the demagnetizing energy?
2 kind of energies: conservative and force-field. 
Work of attraction in a force field doesn't consume the potential that creates the field.

[stivep]

While I am here, at least I don't believe you wasting your time.
I will not put you on the wrong path/
I will not waste your time, by redirecting your attention into some Russian B.S of desinformation.
Some of you may be disappointed, after 10  years or more of no replication of some Russian fakes in FE.
Ugliness of brainwash, poverty, corruption, theft, dictatorship, ever present  threatening, hate, racism, and  banditism of the largest Mafia in the world dressed into governmental uniform is unprecedented.


Tariel Kapanadze device checked by me in Tbilisi Georgia was not fake.
History of Akula and others was explained by me here:
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  « Reply #422 on: June 25, 2022, 05:25:16 PM »

Wesley

[alan]

alan
I agree and the laws state that it takes energy to produce a magnetic field but not to maintain it ie. a permanent magnet.
I also built a permanent electromagnet based on principals similar to the ones you have outlined. All that is required is to keep the free electrons in a perpetual circular motion just like in an atom. If an atom can do it then so can we, it's just a matter of working through the problem.

In fact, the gravitational potential increases as more mass is added to the Earth. That's strange isn't it?, the Earth produces a gravitational field which attracts more mass which produces more Earth and gravitational field attracting more mass... and so on. So here we have a real world example of growth or self-action where the thing producing a force always attracts more stuff to produce more force thus energy. Oh wait, crap, we just proved the Earth does what all the brain dead critics claimed cannot be done. How could they have missed something so obvious?. I mean there literally standing right on top of the thing they claim cannot happen... I call that effect gross incompetence.

Regards
AC

Thanks. Magnetic and electric fields are like gravitational fields, but using them causes the dipole that create them be decreased. 
The Daniel Cook battery and 'perpetual motion holder' are also nice examples. But it is hard to maintain an electromagnet with DC, current and thus B-field keep increasing linearly until saturation. That's why they use AC.

[alan]

While I am here, at least I don't believe you wasting your time.
I will not put you on the wrong path/
I will not waste your time, by redirecting your attention into some Russian B.S of desinformation.
Some of you may be disappointed, after 10  years or more of no replication of some Russian fakes in FE.

Tariel Kapanadze device checked by me in Tbilisi Georgia was not fake.
History of Akula and others was explained by me here:
Re: Reactive Current - Parallel RCL  « Reply #422 on: June 25, 2022, 05:25:16 PM »

Wesley

So EM "free energy" (source being nature) is possible?