Motionless Switching Magnetosphere Electric Generator

[Lunkster]

Hello All,

The attached drawing shows a balanced optional
way to generate electrical energy on my generator
designs without the use of diodes. 
Though small, diodes do create a loss across themselves.
With FE devices, every reduction of losses are helpful.
I  show both a mechanical and electrical option.
I am not sure if I have seen these options before.

The electrical option will likely be more desirable
but the mechanical option could be used in devices
like the electric assist bicycle. 

These designs takes the design of my last post
and combines the two devices into one device
by having one drive component for the device
which eliminates the need for the diodes.
The direction of the PMs from the right side
and the left side of the device are different.

There is a lot of information from different
articles about motionless electrical generators
that explains how the permanent magnet in
the generator interacts with the coils in the
generator to produce a COP > 1.

Lunkster

[Lunkster]

Hello all,

I have updated a few of my generator designs
by switching the permanent magnet and coil
positions in the device.  The reason for this is
that it may increase the performance of the device.

Testing a sub-assembly first before building the
full prototype may be a good option for someone
to do who may want to build one of these devices.

Lunkster

[truesearch]

@Lunkster

I appreciate your efforts and what you've chosen to share here    Thanks!

Just a quick question regarding your non-mechanic image from above (cropped image attached below): for the "drive-coil" did you think that the signal/wave-form should simply increase/decrease to cause a magnetic on/off situation (A in my attached image below)? or should the magnetic coil-domain rather need to "flip" back and forth North/South (B in my attached image) ?

[Lunkster]

Hello,

First of all the two individual output coils of the rev. 2 prototype
generator have been distorted signals.  With a leading step before
the peek with the PMs in one direction and a lagging step in the signal
in the lagging signal.

So the idea is if I combine the two output signal together either
in series or parallel then hopefully the signal would look more like the A and B
signal you are showing.

Now the A signal you show would be the result of a DC pulse signal with
a 50% duty cycle.
The B signal would be the output of an AC driven signal.  Now I believe the
efficiency will be more productive than the current line voltages, 50Hz or 60 Hz.

This is just what I think will happen.

I have enough material to build one of these devices and I would like to do that.
I have already been asked to provide screen shots of my testing.
So maybe I will do that with this design either this fall or next spring.

I was going to move on to something else, but I would like to know
if these motionless generator designs benefit from permanent magnets
placed into the designs.  So my PMs need to be easily placed into and
out of the prototype I am building. 

Just one more note:  I believe that if these designs are to work with switching
DC signals, then I need to ground one side of the drive coil and drive the
other side of the coil between  a positive and negative DC voltage.  This
insures the polarity in the core changes direction.  Also make sure the core
does not get saturated with the voltages you use in the design.


When I did testing with a switching positive only signal, then at line voltage
frequencies, 60Hz, I got the best results at lower duty cycles.  With duty cycles
of 50% for efficient results, I had to raise yhe frequency to 600 hz. or higher.

Lunkster

[truesearch]

@Lunkster,

I'm looking forward to your test results ~ whenever that is.

As a side-note, your development and experiments remind me alot of Flynn's work:
http://www.rexresearch.com/flynn/flynn.htm

Keep us posted.