Milkovic's Pendulum

[Johnsmith]

 With a counter weighted pendulum, the counter weight can conserve the inertia of the swinging pendulum.
This is because when inertia lifts a weight then work is accomplished because mass x distance = work. This
is where seeing how much weight a swinging pendulum can lift will determine how much work can be conserved.
With pendulums, this is what makes known how much work can be done. This is because when a counter weight
is lifted and held in place, it becomes potential kinetic energy. How that energy is used is determined by the
mechanic working on it.

Some Stevie Ray Vaughn for you guys because she Rocks like a pendulum; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtnDOrbmdvY

[Johnsmith]

 The basic test can be as simple as having 2 weights that weigh the same. Then a piece of wood with a hole for a bolt to go through
that allows for the wood to rock. Then have one weight swinging from a string on one side of the board. Then on the other side hang
the other weight.
Limit how much the board can rock to 10 to 15 degrees. With the counterweight, how far from the bolt can it be moved and the swinging weight
still lift it? Then it's a basic math problem of distance times weight minus the distance times weight of the swinging weight.
That will show how much potential energy/work can be generated by a swinging weight.
It is pretty much that simple. Then the question becomes how to harness that potential.

Having the bob (weight of the pendulum) swinging from a board or a rod would be better. And because velocity matters, a 45 degree lift on one
side and then does it get close to its starting point? Because what I have has other arms, not good for testing.

And I had someone message me and tell me that I should enjoy how toxic these forums are. rlortie encouraged AB Hammer to attack me. They're
"real" Americans. AB Hammer went as far as thinking it a compliment when I compared him to a child molester at besslerwheel.com. And he openly
posted to me that he was going to ruin my life because he wanted me and couldn't have me. I would've worked with him if he wanted to but that's
not what he was here for it seems. Yet nothing rlortie or AB Hammer ever did violated forum rules while they got into white supremacy and other
things as well. And with how bad my medical situation is, what's wrong with wanting to enjoy doing something? Kind of why I compare the U.S. to
Ancient Rome and why some people actually tried to take over the U.S. government but weren't tried for treason.
I actually hope to move to Australia.

[norman6538]

This device is a simple seesaw lever with the fulcrum shifted back and forth by shifting the heavy weight on a pendulum back and forth like the oil well pumps...Which is very old technology that has great losses in stopping and starting the material movement.

You could also balance it like the hand pump heavy handle to match the well depth and water weight.

You could match two together to minimize the work in but then when you take work out it becomes unbalanced. 

SO WHY HAS NO ONE MEASURED THE SIMPLE WORK IN AND OUT IN ALL THESE YEARS?

Its not rocket science.

Norman

[Floor]

It's been measured. 

    At one point Milkovic thought it was O.U..
         But long ago he realized that its not,
                      and he said so. 
         The device is an efficient mechanical energy
          transmission device in some applications.

[norman6538]

So why is this still being discussed when my pendulum dropped from 2 o'clock travels past 10 to 12?  clearly 2+ hrs of extra power. So lifting from 6 - 2 is 4 units and then the output would be 6 units giving 150% OU.  My most recent work is still about 200% OU and due to the epidemic of
DDNC    "Dumbed-Down-No-Curiosity" there has been only one question up to now about that work.

If curiosity grows I will reveal what you do not see. I do not give my pearls to the hogs because they would misuse them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FzK2XKQ-74