Hmmm, Can A Hydrogen Fuel Cell and Generator Be Enhanced?

[Johnsmith]

 With an experiment that I've been pursuing in atmospheric chemistry, if successful then it's possible that
I could try experiments at home to see if I can generate H more efficiently. This would also include increasing the efficiency
of generating heat from having H2O occur.
With the experiment that I've been pursuing, it's to test a hypothesis that H2O + CO2 > CH2O, O2 which supports the
Chapman cycle and then 2CH2O > CH4, CO2. Yep, I've been aware for several years what the IPCC has said and I think I've
got it figured out. I have been in contact with scientists about this but it could be seen as perpetual motion, who wants to
say that the IPCC has stated in its own report that they are relying on record levels of CO2 and CH4 to continue?
https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2014/summary/ch5.html

Now if only I wasn't so stupid I might know something. After all, we know that the halogen and photolytic processes do
not allow for the amount of CH2O that has been observed. How can a person learn atmospheric chemistry? Besides, we all
know that might suggest other methods of improving fuel cell technology. That's getting into astrophysics and gravity which
are conservative subjects.
With the experiment, anymore it will be seen as my experiment. And it might be something as basic as conservation of energy
that allows for what has been observed but it isn't understood. A more complex understanding might allow for Coulomb's law
and polarization to have an impact.

As far as this goes, I am building Bessler's wheel which is a toxic subject.

For those interested in fuel cells, could an antennae either strip electrons from atmospheric gasses or convert wave energy in the atmosphere
into electrons in the same fashion as a solar panel? An example is if the ground to the antennae is grounded into a plastic line with crystals in it,
would it feed electrons into the system the same way a solar panel converts solar radiation into electrons?
And I know that grounded current can be looped back to the anode, have seen it in electroplating. And then this might get into creating a torus
for a magnetic field. If so then could that capture magnetic energy to be converted into electrons? Hope you guys don't mind some basic questions.

[Johnsmith]

 A quick question for anyone interested. Since plastic film can be used to make a capacitor https://eepower.com/capacitor-guide/types/film-capacitor/#,
when it's stretched it becomes dielectric.
If a thin (extremely thin) wire mesh were between layers of film, would that help to attract wave energy? This is what I mean about possibly using a
loop in the wire to try and increase the number of electrons going to the cathode in the water. If a capacitor has an internal ground, will that increase the
function of the capacitor?
  And with hydrogen and oxygen, are they more likely to become water in a vacuum? This is wondering if they would because they would be conserving
energy. This has to do with the atmospheric chemistry experiment that I am pursuing. The IPCC can't explain it because accepted practices do not explain
what has been observed.

[Johnsmith]

 The basic premise is that electrons are needed to separate hydrogen elements from oxygen elements. And when separated, they both have a different polarization.
Why does a neutral atomic charge prefer a cathode over an anode? This does not agree with being electrically neutral. An element with a neutral charge will not be
attracted to either a cathode or an anode. That goes against being ionized.

[Johnsmith]

  Something like this might benefit from something similar to a fusion process. Basically a gas or other molecule that can readily give up an electron
could make the process of generating hydrogen more efficient. And this is where salts or a specific frequency of electrical current might encourage
electrons being released. With changing the ionization of a gas, if it could regenerate or absorb and electron from the atmosphere then it would help
to create a sustainable process.
With atmospheric gasses, can O (oxygen) be positively ionized using a natural process? If so then the water being used for hydrogen generation
might benefit from positively ionized oxygen molecules for obvious reasons.
With hydrogen generation, it is about adding 2 electrons to a water molecule so it becomes hydrogen and oxygen. And for a "green" sustainable practice,
it might need to be observed where water is separating between the anode and the cathode. This is because O2 is attracted to the anode and H2 to the
anode. And it might be as simple as creating a vacuum which both O2 and H2 can rise in. Then when being turned back into water, the vacuum is maintained.
With conservation of energy, this might encourage it in both the generation and the power generation.
And for a power plant, the static head (column) could power a hydroelectric generator or the hydrogen could be stored for use as a source of clean energy.
With a power plant, if the overall process were 80% efficient then that would decrease the amount of input energy from solar and wind power. And with something
like that, if batteries were 100% recyclable or close to it then electric cars could be powered by actual Green Energy.

[kolbacict]

We would try to divide carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide into chemical elements for a start.
Liquid or gaseous. These substances are electrical insulators and it is much easier to create
the field we want in them. If  work it out , you can  start it for a  water.