Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[listener192]

In the video, the switched DC generator is stated to use a standard 3 phase alternator stator unmodified.


The electrical rotor shown appears to be a straightforward 16 spoke design, with single coils on each spoke.


What is the lenz circumvention mechanism for this design?


We have not seen any instrumented tests for this design.


The rig appears to have three DC to AC 60Hz power inverters?

[listener192]

Next question: Do you consider the US Patent Office patents that Dr. Holcomb demonstrates to be fraudulent?
https://www.instagram.com/p/CiOAmPaOrWW/

Another question is why are you so sure about the inoperability of Holcomb generators?
Personally, I do not doubt the efficiency of the declared indicators. This is not about physics, but about an engineering solution, excitation and organization of the movement of a magnetic field in the stator yoke, acting through the slotted rods.

Мало того в данном материале, возможность работы такой системы подтверждена
https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/static-electromagnetic-transducer.html

The U.S. patent granted makes no clain regarding self running, only the WIPO patent makes this claim.


Holcomb has shown power input /output instrument readings for the cogeneration AC device. He has not shown such instrument readings for the switched DC system.

[rakarskiy]

listener192
Do you think Lenz's rule causes the rotor to brake in the generator stator? The modern interpretation of Lenz's rule is incorrect. Lenz's original rule has a correct and different interpretation.
Bypassing the effect of electromagnetic attraction in the rotor / stator of the generator is possible only with the control of electromagnetic attraction (Adams, Tewari, etc.)
What mechanism Holcomb used in this case, I think, is not disclosed by any patent.

Issued Holcomb patents are not currently viewable in the patent database. Therefore, do not speculate with unverified information.

Solid state transformation/gain shown as COP-7.0. It goes without saying that turning such an indicator into an independent system is already an engineering decision.

[rakarskiy]

He does the right thing by not pointing out. He received a patent in the United States, and no one cancels the effect of the 1951 Act. For an engineer, everything is already clear, but fagot lawyers, in the service of evil, should not be given a reason to find fault. Good luck

[bistander]

In a simpler form for you:

1. initial energy is "H" [amp-turn/length unit or Orsteds]

2. process is material B-H -- conversion is simply Faraday (et. al.) both ways

3. output energy is "B" [Tesla or Gauss]

4. initial energy "H" in amp-turn/cm (orsted) - output energy is "B" in Tesla (gauss)

Both quantities are 'Magnetic Energy' but use different names/nomenclature to distinguish between the two.

Once you understand B and H - H is the source and B is the resultant so to speak. Pretty simple actually, maybe too simple,
but not for most. More of a KISS thing.

How ever you decide to configure this Gain in your device is entirely up to you as your the designer. Coil/Lap turns, material, source
Voltage/Amps, pulse sequence, drivers, control processor, Rotor/Stator size/shape, etc.

A great deal of efficiency is also gained by the "floating magnetic field" (rotating or sliding). Again,
as the designer it's entirely up to you how that is deployed in your design. It's all there for your use.

Too simple - maybe, but not really! See the referenced book for details and formulas. See the EM CAE for proofs.

<snip>

Hello SL,
I apologize for putting a reply to this old post of yours, but turns out it is pertinent to a point which I wanted to address on your recent our.com post. I am not a member there although I follow it. I attempted to join years ago but was ignored. So here's a cut/paste of the subject post:
______
See the attached .pdf for a brief explaination of the analytics (formulas) involved, including
a link to a good online physics calculator for iterative solving of "Faraday's Law."

Hopefully this is easy to understand for everyone and of some value!

SL


------------------------

 LinGen Technical Brief -Analytic-.pdf (217.78 kB - downloaded 13 times.)

 _________

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg102190;topicseen#msg102190
Reply#416

________

First off, in the pdf you state H to have units of Amperes/Turns. Is this a typo?

I have some more discussion, but need to take a break and wish to see if I get your attention over here.

Thanks,
bi