Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

Thanks SL,

Same information that I learned years ago when I worked with their application engineer. So are you telling that you walk away from that article thinking that remanent induction is the same thing (meaning the same value for a specific material) as its Coercivity, or that B_r = H_c?
O.K.
bi

ps. Noticed something really picky. Where you say "negative value called Hc or HcB -- this is the "coercivity" of the material.[/font]"

It's not H_cB. It's H_cb, I believe. I'm not too familiar with the notation, but did find this example attached. From: https://www.asa-7.top/products.aspx?cname=properties+of+permanent+magnet

Right you are!

Have good one...

[kolbacict]

In the Ukrainian language there is a word "рух" which means movement.
Maybe this is what is meant? 

[rakarskiy]

I made an explanatory picture for the circuit where the capacitor is discharged to the load. Consider this my theory, because in principle I explain the process in this way, and this is my concept, unlike the official one. The official one does not suit me, since I do not consider the movement of charged parts in the form of negatively charged electrons to be a reason for the current system. From my point of view, the movement of electrons is the nonsense of official science. I am a supporter of the field (plasma) concept.
EMF and magnetic induction around the conductor are eddy field structures, which are actually described in Ohm's law as voltage and current strength.
Sincerely.

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/iz_seti/electromotive_force_current/2-1-0-151
http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/2_ehlektrodvizhushhaja_sila_i_sila_toka_magnitnoe_pole_i_prichem_tut_ehlektron/3-1-0-153

[bistander]

I made an explanatory picture for the circuit where the capacitor is discharged to the load. Consider this my theory, because in principle I explain the process in this way, and this is my concept, unlike the official one. The official one does not suit me, since I do not consider the movement of charged parts in the form of negatively charged electrons to be a reason for the current system. From my point of view, the movement of electrons is the nonsense of official science. I am a supporter of the field (plasma) concept.
EMF and magnetic induction around the conductor are eddy field structures, which are actually described in Ohm's law as voltage and current strength.
Sincerely.

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/iz_seti/electromotive_force_current/2-1-0-151
http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/2_ehlektrodvizhushhaja_sila_i_sila_toka_magnitnoe_pole_i_prichem_tut_ehlektron/3-1-0-153

Hi rakarskiy,
Thanks very much for your explanation. I now understand why your derivations and comments make little sense to me. Good luck with such far fetched perspective.
Respectfully,
bi

edit. ps. I apologize for referring to a diagram of yours as scribbles. You have posted some most excellent graphics. Well done.

[rakarskiy]

bistander, in no way do I insist on accepting my point of view!
But who is right and who is wrong time will judge. In any case, my concept completely intersects with both Ohm's law and all developments in design.
Thanks to recent work, I completely got rid of the illusion.
The main thing is simple, now I look at my delusions with a smile.

Sincerely.