Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Lottalead]

Yes, I do. I see Bob Walker, President of Global Business Development at Holcomb Scientific Research, a big player on the team who you promoted 6 months ago, backing away. His profile didn't read like a wimp who'd step away from a top position in a company launching an exclusive world changing trillion $ technology due to hurt feelings.
So you say this forum will know for sure in 1, or 3 or 4 weeks. See you then.
bi

The fact of the matter is that we don't know what happened. Maybe Bob got fired or rebuffed in some other way. We'll see. Yes it has been over six months since Astra took the lead in bringing this tech to market. There was much to do. It's my assumption/WAG that it is very close, hence the increase in rhetoric. As SL has stated, who cares? We know it works.
A-HES has been completely silent. I think that is about to change very soon. I've put my money where my mouth is.
Have a nice day!
LL

[SolarLab]

Hi SL

My pleasure to share.

You are assuming page 11 provides some good insight relating to the Holcomb magnetics device operation. We don't even know if Holocomb device really has an operation. Besides, Sweet did not really know what he was saying. In addition to recently surfaced leaks of the insider, i already addressed their 'demonstration' of supposed 2.5kw in 20kw out, not very convincing at all.

"We got some load on right now" he says and points to the bulbs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkwYCpFMP8w

Test load we see are 12 incandescent bulbs. 20kw load? And when asked about this discrepancy they reply in the comments

"The 12-incandescent light bank is only a part of the load. There are also motors, transformers, capacitors, etc.in that load bank calculation.".

Well, capacitors are not a load, transformers neither except for the losses unless they are loaded with actual load, neither are motors unless they do work, free running also only consumes for losses.

This is not how you do a proper OU demonstration. It should be done in clear space without cables all around, device should not be plugged into the wall at all, load should be clearly shown, not just few bulbs in the background that don't amount to 1kW and claim 20kw.

As for your "however"..... firstly, i don't promote Sweet's 'theory' as something to go by, he is only shared for the motional electric field, nothing more nothing less. As for the 3 terms you mention "Negative Energy, Spacetime, virtual vacuum" are not exactly common "themes" of the past, but they are not understood by the mainstream. And these are not "OU Twilight Zone" but mechanics of time-space and etheric universal currents that need to be properly understood to understand OU.

I have elaborated in great depth on Kapandaze thread recently and on others before on all this. In short....

Negative energy is absolutely real, it is the antigravity current, it would be very foolish of you to dismiss this so better study it. As Phylos wrote in A Dweller it was the greatest discovery of Atlantis to find that law of gravitation has superimposed over it law of antigravitation and as the first belongs to what he called day side of nature - for same energy coming as etheric invisible non-herzian 'light' from the Sun CREATES light and heat in the upper atmosphere, and that the negative, reflected energy returning from Earth to the Sun is what Atlantis called Navaz or night-side forces, namely antigravity (at double frequency of gravity which is itself far above ultraviolete (non-herzian)), darkness and cold. Always when levitation is reported is also reported steep drop in temperature, the very Sweet we are discussing who reported to Bearden that his device lost all weight when fully loaded (1kW) and wires froze....this is literally the negative energy, this is the Maxin Light, this is the cold breeze on top of the head when kundalini is activated, this is the cold felt in room when 'ghosts' and any astral phenomena is present.

So as Phylos wrote and as Keely, Hollingshead and others experimentally proved and also clearly said in their papers, there are two vertical streams, positive inward one is what you call gravity (associated with heat death) and outward one associated with levitation (associated with cold and vitality, life). This is also exactly what Schauberger wrote and proved.

It is an etheric stream coming from the Sun in one form, dropping down into our dimension and back out of it in changed form.

So in short, negative energy is very very real, as i said Sweet reported it and countless others. When wires freeze at full load and things begin to float, that is it, very simple.

Further on, it is not spacetime but time-space, i wrote in great depth about all this and no need to repeat except shortly that God first creates a bucking field by two sets of vibrations 180° out of phase and gives structure to this abstract field by polarizing it with 6 axis of time thus creating 3d space. All this is i already explained here and it's also on my blog.

https://vril12.wordpress.com/6-axis-of-time/
https://vril12.wordpress.com

As for virtual vacuum or what they call virtual photons or virtual electron-positron pairs in the mainstream they are really talking about ether. All space is filled with these "bubbles of nothing", which are LITERALLY tiny voids in the densest medium of all, time-space itself. All space is filled with this primordial matter, materia prima, and it is almost imortal, planets and suns rise out of it and dissolve back into it, only at great dissolutions (pralaya) are these bubbles destroyed, that is, dissolved into yet higher form of matter which is contained within them, in fact, as i wrote many times, ether of lower planes is created by condensation of ether of higher planes, 49 bubbles of higher plane join to form a single bubble of a plane below it, and so on in russian doll like manner.

This condensing factor 49 is the reason density of matter, speed of light and rate of time flow all increase times fortynine each plane/octave above and this is how people travel intergalactic distances, by rising just one or two levels above, crossing the same distance in much shorter time and then recondensing.

Everything is made of universal currents. There are spirals within spirals, wheels within wheels, all is in motion, all IS motion.

All these things have extreme merit, this is the science of the magicians, wizards, this is the science of occultists, of secret military space programs, of ETs, of all who are intelligent everywhere and everywhen, and much of real engineering or physics data that can be leveraged into a usable form for further development is available, but it is scattered and delicate, rare have done the proper research and rare are able to get it. As i wrote many times, it is absolutely essential that one rises to higher energy level within himself before he can control the Force, whether by electronic means, or directly by Will, or both.

What may appear as more conventional scheme is you imposing on it what you want it to be. Sure, solar panel may be called overunity but it is in fact less than 20% efficient, but if for example backEMF is harvested for overunity, that is not a conventional scheme, ALL real overunity schemes are accessing the negative energy in some form, for all positive energy systems are by definition underunity.

And these higher aspects of science and technology, work of Keely, Hollingshead, Rota and many other great ones, and Sweet who produced the effects but did not understand what he was doing, these are not "tree hugging", these are Higher Science, Higher, Divine Technology.

One needs to seek that, not roll in the mud of herzian heat death (as Don put it).

Again, my pleasure to share.

Regards,

Nix

Hi Nix,

FYI - from my professional analysis and observations; the Holcomb devices do
actually work - the theory is sound and the demonstrations bare this out.

Also, I have many years of proven experience in both Physics and Engieering in
Space Sciences and Payload Design - including studies involving many of the
"Gray Zone" energy claims going back many years. There are a variety of science
papers available but non contain any usable technical conclusions or details.

By my mearly thanking you for the "Sparky" paper and pointing out where,
IMHO, this paper goes astray [as many do -when they hit what appears to be
a "technical brick wall" - they just start making shit up -] you seem to have
gone "over-the-edge."

Sorry, I won't bother responding to you any further. Have a good one!

SL

FWIW - Few, if any, Professional Papers go into "Tree Hugging" scenarios when
an unexplainable technical, or other, barrier is encountered.

They simply state this fact in the conclusion and remark that further work
is required - rarely, if ever, "do they just start making shit up!"

That's one of the major differences between "Forum Scribblings" and
"Professional Work-product."

This is clearly obvious when reviewing the Holcomb Patents and Presentations. Real
tangable facts and conclusions are presented and, when professionally analyzed, the
presented claims stand-up.

Also, a very good hint to follow before deciding to analyze any (new or old) concept
or idea.

[nix85]

Hi Nix,

FYI - from my professional analysis and observations; the Holcomb devices do
actually work - the theory is sound and the demonstrations bare this out.

Also, I have many years of proven experience in both Physics and Engieering in
Space Sciences and Payload Design - including studies involving many of the
"Gray Zone" energy claims going back many years. There are a variety of science
papers available but non contain any usable technical conclusions or details.

By my mearly thanking you for the "Sparky" paper and pointing out where,
IMHO, this paper goes astray [as many do -when they hit what appears to be
a "technical brick wall" - they just start making shit up -] you seem to have
gone "over-the-edge."

Sorry, I won't bother responding to you any further. Have a good one!

SL

FWIW - Few, if any, Professional Papers go into "Tree Hugging" scenarios when
an unexplainable technical, or other, barrier is encountered.

They simply state this fact in the conclusion and remark that further work
is required - rarely, if ever, "do they just start making shit up!"

That's one of the major differences between "Forum Scribblings" and
"Professional Work-product."

This is clearly obvious when reviewing the Holcomb Patents and Presentations. Real
tangable facts and conclusions are presented and, when professionally analyzed, the
presented claims stand-up.

Also, a very good hint to follow before deciding to analyze any (new or old) concept
or idea.

Hi SL,

FYI - we are all aware you have been claiming Holcomb devices work, but
you never backed that up with anything solid, just few simulation diagrams
that prove nothing and endless useless drama.

Their "demonstrations" don't prove anything. I linked their "demonstration"
of supposed 2kw in 20kw out, only load we see is 12 bulbs that don't add
up to even 1kw. "Demonstration" is extremely non transparent, one may
even say deceptive (as ex employee claims). Funny you did not address
this at all.

And his "theory" is ridiculous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nm1VJ65LcXM

His whole "theory" is repeating the most basic facts that iron atom has
4 unpaired electrons and thus has a net magnetic field (perfectly explained
in the canadian documentary from the 80s i linked number of times already).
And then he says how electric steel amplifies flux of a coil "4-5 times" and he
claims this is 5x overunity. That is his whole "theory", that iron is ferromagnetic
and that it amplifies flux. Firstly, electrical steel does not amplify flux 4-5
times, but 4-5 THOUSAND times or more, as table below shows permeability
of electrical steel is up to 20,000 and other materials up to million.
Secondly, altho i strongly believe high permeability cores are great potential for
overunity, using them as ordinary transformers is no overunity. The other day
i again shared my idea for high permeability core flyback transformer and pix
corrected me rightfully that altho small current in the primary is enough to
establish very large flux in the core, the reverse is also true, small current
in the secondary is enough to counteract it (lenz). I admitted back there
that i omitted this important detail. I also wrote there is more to it, for
there are countless reports that backEMF yields overunity, altho it is usually
not much more than 100%. So, IF Holcomb is really getting 5x overunity,
it is surely not by mere fact of iron's permeability, he is either using
screening foil for the secondary like Alexander Mikhalych and others
to divert the lenz and possibly resonance too, and/or delayed lenz ala Heins etc.
There must be SOME method to bypass the usual 'walls'. And, again, IF
he's getting what he claims, he surely did NOT disclose which method he uses.

In addition, all that iron does is it concentrates vortexya aka Earth's
etheric field.

As for your "proven experience" i cringed so hard. My my if you only knew
how ironic is your "self-credentializing". If you only knew the REAL Physics
and Engineering in Space Sciences (advanced propulsion systems, radiation
shielding, life support and so on infinitely in all space-transport/living related
areas), the REAL energy/overunity principles (many already shared here) etc.

Let's not forget you claimed and supposedly still claim Dr. Schwartz is
a scammer altho he is not a scammer by any means, from his rods to
his ERR box.

Sparky's "theory" is not important, whether he was "making shit up" or not,
he achieved effects but he did not know, he had no access to key info.

And you mentioned those terms and made a claim they belong to past
(funny, as if you "know"), so i explained them in short, i did not "go over
the edge", i summarized the advanced knowledge, but of course it all flew over
your head. Ironically, it is you who has been going over the edge for a long
time now, defending Holcomb like a fanatic.

You are now trying to push the idea of "professional papers", as if something is
correct just cause it is packed in "professional" paper and vice versa. What a joke.
We have recently seen an example of a "professional paper" yet 100% flawed
as clearly proven. So not only do they "make shit up", they base whole "theories"
and "experiments" on flawed ideas and not-understanding. Not to mention how
utterly flawed most of mainstream "science" is, sleazily crafted to distract from the Truth.

Like i wrote already, i do not promote Sweet's "theory", i shared a screenshot where
he talks about Motional Electric Field, in context of two kinds of induction by Henry,
Aharonov–Bohm effect, related to subtle side of induction i have been talking
about. Even that screenshot i shared i don't agree with much of what he says, not
to mention the whole document. So Sweet's "theory" is irrelevant for most part,
and you grabbed onto it as if it has some special importance. Sweet is important
for the effects he achieved, not his "theory".

You try to paint the picture of your supposed "professionalism" while it is clear from
your whole opus you are doing nothing but "Forum Scribblings" and "Tree Hugging".

Nothing is "clearly obvious" about Holcomb, they gave no "real tangible facts", not
even a real tangible THEORY, let alone a proper demonstration where device is
not plugged into the wall, powering a real load etc. The way they "do" it is exactly
the opposite of how it should be done - with 100% transparency.

Sorry (not sorry), i won't bother responding to you any further either. Have a good one!

Nix

[Lottalead]

Hi. Hope you're having a good day!
LL

[nix85]

Hi. Great day in fact, hope you're having a great day too!

Nix