Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

nix85, you are sick? I'm not a doctor

The experiment is not erroneous, it fully confirms the transformer EMF formula, which I indicated in the previous post and which physics cannot explain.

[alan]

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578769/#msg578769

The "self-evident" fact that flux lines clash in the wire PROVES wire cuts the flux.

This is wire cutting flux.

EMF is normally induced due to flux lines cutting the wire as they clash in the middle and also when they merge and form big loops of flux passing through the coil.

There is no "another EMF", this is perfectly "normal" induction with both methods flux cutting and linking. If you look at the field lines as i explained countless times and if you calculate according to it, you will see it is exactly as i described.

With induction by transformer action or flux linking, nothing cuts the wires when the B field is completely confined in the core, it is the A(ether)-magnetic vector potential that is doing the work, changing  this causes emf. So this is probably the same action in flux cutting that causes induction.

[nix85]

rakarskiy Funny. YOU are sick? i am not a doctor either but you are in denial of reality.

You are writing complete nonsense. Experiment is 100% bogus, flawed. There is nothing strange about induction happening in such configuration, any more than induction in any generator of any kind. Induction is happening both by wire cutting and flux linking.

1) Two fluxes clash in the wire (or against its flux)

2) Once flux lines that clash in the wire (or against its flux) merge, they form a loop that passes through the wire loop

3) Both of these induce voltage in normal manner

You cannot deny any of these 3 points for they are undeniable and prove it is just classical induction at work.

There are many examples that manistream cannot explain but this is definitely not one of them

[nix85]

With induction by transformer action or flux linking, nothing cuts the wires when the B field is completely confined in the core, it is the A(ether)-magnetic vector potential that is doing the work, changing  this causes emf. So this is probably the same action in flux cutting that causes induction.

Obviously so, that is exactly what i've been saying last few pages and for years around here, it is the A field aka Magnetic Vector Potential aka ether that is the real mediator for both types of induction, and they are two aspects of one phenomena.

As i wrote few posts back

in a toroid transformer, all flux is contained within the core, coils "feel" the change of flux through them.

To me this clearly indicates induction is really mediated through higher order field, namely, the A-field.

Yes, like i said deep understanding of induction is essential for OU, both B-Field and A-Field,
and intelligent application of this knowledge to bypass lenz.

I studied Sweet and have read his paper i uploaded, he is using both formulas in the paper.

E=Bvl and E=NdΦ/dt

But there is no need to get hang too much on formulas, they are both saying the same thing in
slightly different way....

Greater the rate of change of flux greater the voltage.


The practical distinction between these "two phenomena" or rather, two aspects of one phenomena is

As i wrote here

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578716/#msg578716

If north flux passes across the wire as shown electron will be pushed up, no matter which way you close that loop, whether you make the flux enter the loop or exit it, irrelevant, electron will go up, always.

So one is direct reaction of wire to change of flux across it while the latter does not require flux cutting the wire,
namely, in a toroid transformer, all flux is contained within the core, coils "feel" the change of flux through them.

To me this clearly indicates induction is really mediated through higher order field, namely, the A-field.

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Andersen_AETHER_CONTROL_via_an_understanding_of_ORTHOGONAL_FIELDS.pdf

And this

As i as i said before, the fact coil "feels" the change of flux through it to me clearly indicates induction is really mediated through higher order field, namely, the A-field aka Magnetic Vector Potential

And this

https://overunity.com/18391/two-kinds-of-induction-henry/msg541766/#msg541766

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prXkW9l3MzM

We can see in the last video about leakage how guy explains flux prefers to loop on itself through the air, rather than go through the core surrounded by aluminum ring.

This is a very peculiar thing. Why would flux in the core care about a ring that is OUTSIDE of a core. This is the whole point. Magnetic field is just an effect, ether (A-Field) is the true medium of transmission.

Obviously, aluminum ring develops counterflux that repels the flux in the core so it prefers to loop through the air, but, again, the fact coil "feels" change of flux through it is the main point and shows induction is mediated through a different (A) field

[nix85]

BTW, i have few years back tried to make lenzless generator based on idea flux in the toroid coil is totally contained inside as shown below. First photo is not mine, it just demonstrates the flux containment. Idea was to have two opposing sets of magnets on each side, N to N and as they cut wire vertically, induced field was supposed to be at 90° through whole toroid so magnets should not see the lenz. It ultimately failed and i opened a thread about it here but i still believe that idea can work with some changes.

So much work went into, 2 versions 2 years. First i made it all one big toroid coil with 1.4mm wire, about 32 cm diameter and 15 cm thick, made of plywood, it had a big hole in the center so looking from the front coil was about 10cm thick on the front side and magnets were 4cm x 2cm cylinder N52 neodymiums, VERY strong. There were two rotors on one shaft (aluminum 15mm thick), one on each side of the big toroid, each with 6 magnets. And what a disappointment when i built it and spun the magnets almost no voltage induced in the toroid.

Then i changed it, got new magnets, rectangular shaped (attached), 12 rotors 12 magnets each, also N to N, they were supposed to be N52 i think but turned out to be very weak, uncomparably weaker to mentioned cylinderical ones. I ordered plexiglass panels 2cm thick, designed everything, found company to CNC the holes for the magnets (their 3D model attached).

I got circa 15kg of 1mm wide copper wire and hand wound 12 coils, it took me few weeks to wind them!! All hand wound on hand-made coil winder which toward the later coils started to fall apart (screw loosened up) and so later ones turned out thicker than first ones. Each was circa 250 turns, i am not sure anymore exactly, i think resistance was circa 3 ohms. So this time it was not all one continuous toroid but 12 coils about 5cm from each other in the middle, parallel connection.

I made a nice flat plywood toroid core in two pieces, (2 C shapes) and stuck 12 coils on them, looked nice but again what a disappointment, induced voltage was again very low, had to abandon the idea.

Before these i had two big projects which also failed, first one Thomas Engel motor replica and an inertial device. Each of these also took at least year and a half, immense amount of work, money, dealing with turners, companies, delivery companies. But it's all a valuable learning experience.