Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[rakarskiy]

 

Who told you that you need Over Unity's secret technology?
You need to develop a technical project for the given parameters of the device, this is already engineering work, engineering creativity. Motley Physics will not help here, but only more confused with their unconfirmed concepts. It is necessary to use materials for design engineers who build electromechanical generators.

Take any synchronous electromechanical generator, in which the stator winding enters the groove, and disassemble its operation "by the bones".

Then you replace the mechanical rotor (with permanent magnets or electromagnets) with a solid-state rotor, where the rotation of the magnetic field (conditionally constant field, constant magnetic field flow) is organized by switching the electromagnets according to an algorithm that simulates the movement of the magnetic poles of a synchronous electromechanical generator. You take away the element of mechanical force, you overcome the magnetic attraction of the rotor/stator, you get what you are looking for.

My little explanation of what kind of animal is a static electromagnetic generator, which uses a solid-state rotor that simulates the rotation of a magnetic field in the system.

Imagine a traditional synchronous mechanical power generator (for example, installed on a car). From the course of electromechanics and electrodynamics, we are told that an electrical mechanical generator is a device that converts the mechanical energy of rotation into electrical energy. I strongly disagree with this statement. First, the Lawrence force can be explained with a stretch, only for an open conductor moving in a magnetic field, or vice versa. In a car alternator, the wire enters the groove of the magnetic circuit. The movement of the field in the magnetic circuit is explained by the change in the magnetic saturation of the core during the rotation of the poles of the magnetic flux in the body of the core. Designers and physicists explain this EMF in such a generator by the appearance of a vortex electric field around the conductor (EMF), when the magnetic field parameter changes with time. In the case of fixed conductors, the induction EMF is a consequence of the action on free charges of the vortex electric field that occurs when the magnetic field changes. The concept of a vortex electric field was introduced into physics by the great English physicist J. Maxwell in 1861.
Now imagine the design of a generator, a slotted stator, in which the winding of a three-phase generator for a twelve-pole magnetic rotor (six pairs of poles) is laid. The rotor is an electromagnet, made on an axis, with two branched pole plates, which form six poles of one pole. These branches are bent towards the middle of the coil on the axis so that they form twelve (6X6) electromagnetic poles. When the axis rotates, a rotation of these poles relative to the stator is formed. The magnetic field at the poles of the rotor is a consequence of the operation of an electromagnet, which has its own consumed electrical power. The voltage of the on-board network is 12 Volts, the maximum excitation current is 5 Amperes. Maximum excitation power 12V * 5A = 72W. To create the peak value of the magnetic induction in the stator, an electromagnet excitation power of 72 W is required compared to the output maximum power of the electric generator of 1.5 kW. The question arises where such a result comes from. You can see the answer in the physics textbook MAGNETIZATION OF STEEL. The rotation of the rotor on the shaft from an external mechanical driving force provides a "rotation" of the field or, as far as the stator core is concerned, a synchronous change in the magnetic field (magnetic induction) at a certain point. The reason for the braking of the generator shaft is the magnetic blocking of the electromagnetic attraction of the two electromagnets of the rotor and stator. When a phase circuit is closed into an electrical circuit with a load, a current arises in the wires, which in turn forms the electromagnetic force of the "stator electromagnet". Overcoming the electromagnetic forces of attraction of the rotor / stator is carried out by the electromagnetic moment of the generator. This is the necessary mechanical energy, which is not converted, but forms a variable component of magnetic induction from the rotor electromagnet, rotating it in the generator stator. As you can see, we did not find any signs of the conversion of mechanical energy into electrical energy. Conventionally, it can be neglected for direct calculation of the conversion of the input electrical excitation power Pr into the output power of the generator phases Pg. Again, it is conditionally possible to determine the conversion efficiency:
                                             Efficiency = Pg / Pr = 1.5 kW / 0.075 kW = 20.0 (2000%)
Mechanical rotation of the magnetic poles in the stator, and if you make a device where the movement of the field will be simulated by turning the electromagnets on and off according to a special algorithm. Suppose we increase the cost of excitation to 200 W (0.2 kW), in any case, the efficiency will be = Pg / Pr = 1.5 kW / 0.2 kW = 7.5 (750%).

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578767/#msg578767




PS
The "biggest secret" that is hidden and put in a prominent place is the secret of the synchronous generator. This is the secret of the real EMF of induction.

[kolbacict]

Then you replace the mechanical rotor (with permanent magnets or electromagnets) with a solid-state rotor, where the rotation of the magnetic field (conditionally constant field, constant magnetic field flow) is organized by switching the electromagnets according to an algorithm that simulates the movement of the magnetic poles of a synchronous electromechanical generator. You take away the element of mechanical force, you overcome the magnetic attraction of the rotor/stator, you get what you are looking for.

The thing is, it's not the same thing.
At least I have not found confirmation that one can be easily replaced by another.
In my experiments.

[SolarLab]

Gentlemen,

Keep in mind "You have to be Good Stuards of your  technology!"

Like the Medical "Hipocratic Oath" - worldwide.

Consider the implications of your "Technology Developments."

E.G. - Don't come up with something that has the possibility of  "Burning
YOUR own, or any one elses, house down, or killing someone!"

Spend some time and do it RIGHT" ...

Losts of things to consider! (Ask the McDonalds "Hot Coffee" lady).

Just MHO. [see the "Caution" I posted]

SL

[rakarskiy]

The thing is, it's not the same thing.
At least I have not found confirmation that one can be easily replaced by another.
In my experiments.

I can assure you that the solid-state Holcomb rotor is similar in principle to the magnetic rotor of an electromechanical generator.
Making an electromagnetic device from scrap metal is like making a Tesla out of a bicycle.

[alan]

Maybe Holcomb is fake after all, and just another investment fraud... Time will tell.