Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[kolbacict]

Hmm. It seems me,I'm right. Think . If there are no controlling and restrictive elements in the system ...  And there is no payload either yet. It is enough just to pass over one hundred percent at least a little bit. Self powered system. And the energy will tumble down as if from a cornucopia is not limited.  :)If you do not give the load more than a certain value, so as not to choke the process. For example, a nuclear fission reaction, a chain reaction. Uncontrolled bomb,
And controlled ,nuclear power plant. Refute me...

p.s.

Daisy chain is multiple 1.1 units combined until self running.

Also as an option, I think it will work.

[nix85]

It is nonsense that 1.1 to 2 (above all losses) is not enough to loop. Like i wrote, even if voltage/frequency/rectification conversion is needed, modern transformers/inverters are very efficient.

110% efficiency above input and losses is definitely enough to loop it, not to mention 200 or 250%.

[SolarLab]

F.Y.I.

The attached snapshoots should provide some prospective as to the scope of
Dr. Holcomb's developments over the years.

A good starting point is to evaluate, in detail, each of his many submissions
before speculating, or drawing any uneducated conclusions, about the systems.

It is clear why the "ILPG" is key to development of "low maintenance, reliable,
lower cost" solutions for higher power applications (their simplicity versus a
more complex stand-alone implementation).

Patent numbers are part of the snapshot titles.

It should be obvious why the "Cellphone Battery" [LinGen] embodiment part
needed further analysis and development.

No further comments are needed... 

SL

[nix85]

More useless diagrams and uneducated claims, basic KEY questions remain unanswered.

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578963/#msg578963

In the supposed Holcomb generator

1) What exactly is shielded, how many layers of mu-metal and of which thickness
2) What is the use of inner stator

According to shown 4 poles it appears to produce same rotating field as outer stator,
supposedly sandwiching the "secondary" N to N, but there is no proof of this, this is
purely my conjecture, guessing.

3) How exactly is lenz drag reduced / almost eliminated. Shield is almost certainly
playing a big role in this, but nothing is explained, nothing revealed.

How bout some CLARITY and TRANSPARENCY.

I am personally not interested in Holcomb and consider it inferior to other methods,
but since some here claim to "know" what Holcomb is doing, they should at least give
answers to these basic, KEY questions.

[SolarLab]

More useless diagrams and uneducated claims, basic KEY questions remain unanswered.

https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-energy-systemsbreakthrough-technology-to-the-world/msg578963/#msg578963

In the supposed Holcomb generator

1) What exactly is shielded, how many layers of mu-metal and of which thickness
2) What is the use of inner stator

According to shown 4 poles it appears to produce same rotating field as outer stator,
supposedly sandwiching the "secondary" N to N, but there is no proof of this, this is
purely my conjecture, guessing.

3) How exactly is lenz drag reduced / almost eliminated. Shield is almost certainly
playing a big role in this, but nothing is explained, nothing revealed.

How bout some CLARITY and TRANSPARENCY.

I am personally not interested in Holcomb and consider it inferior to other methods,
but since some here claim to "know" what Holcomb is doing, they should at least give
answers to these basic, KEY questions.

Nix85,

Sorry Nix - I can't grow a "BRAIN" for you! 

You'll have to do that for yourself...

In the mean time - please stop making a fool of yourself - looks bad for the general
thread participants and casual viewers.

Since you're not interested in Holcomb's devices; don't bother blessing us with such
stupid uneducated and uninformed nonsense. Thanks!

SL