Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[nix85]

Nix,

And your technical analisys is?

Please share your detailed analysis. Analytic or Numeric, either one would be geat!

We are all listening. Especially me!

SL

Don't muddy the waters, focus on the question of lenz drag.

The claim that lenz is mitigated by "not having the live rotating magnetized rotor sweep
past the stator" is absolutely ridiculous. Mere fact that rotating field is produced by solid
state means instead of mechanical rotation does NOT mitigate lenz.

Take and induction motor and remove its rotor and put a a bunch of coils in its place.
Load the coils and primary current will go up proportionally.

I already proposed the possibility that he is using delayed lenz ala Heins. This has been
discussed in-depth and proven that at higher frequencies induced field is delayed.

https://overunity.com/18653/ac-voltage-from-single-magnetic-pole/msg551987/#msg551987

But, again, Holcomb is using low frequency so that is more less totally out of question.

And there is of course also the factor of shielding, but it is not known exactly what is shielded
or how much, is secondary shielded, from photos does not appear to be. Unknown.

So question remains HOW is lenz drag reduced in this particular device.

[rakarskiy]

In modern realities, while this is global on the planet, devices with the OverUnity sign will not be produced and sold to the population, which is the main consumer from the production of electricity, heat, etc. by corporations.

As sad as it is, it is.

In the last century, the American inventor and physicist John Bedingfield formulated the thesis in 1984. He argued that if you want to get a free energy generator, then you have to make it yourself.

As relevant today as never before, unfortunately.


https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html

[SolarLab]

Apparently you seem to think the Magnetic field can not be truncated prior to moving
to the next incursion with the next pole - why not, if using a non-rotating rotor, seems 
pretty logical if the controller decides to not allow this.

Don't know - maybe you'll figure it, our not - probably not, oh well...

Anyway - nice to have Dumbo on board. I guess!

[nix85]

I do not think that and i did not say or imply that, but what you suggest is not realistic. Turning off the magnetic field just before it faces the next pole AND... There is no lenz mitigation in this. And before all, you can't turn 3-phase rotating magnetic field on off like you would a single mechanically rotating electromagnet. 3-phase RMF needs continuity for flux to merge.

You should figure out that your "idea" is not a solution for lenz mitigation. Nothing new there.

As for your edit, lol. You're the biggest Dumbo i ever saw on this forum, ever. And it's nice to have you to have a laugh.

[SolarLab]

I do not think that and i did not say or imply that, but what you suggest is not realistic. Turning off the magnetic field just before it faces the next pole AND... There is no lenz mitigation in this. And before all, you can't turn 3-phase rotating magnetic field on off like you would a single mechanically rotating electromagnet. 3-phase RMF needs continuity for flux to merge.

You should figure out that your "idea" is not a solution for lenz mitigation. Nothing new there.

As for your edit, lol. You're the biggest Dumbo i ever saw on this forum, ever. And it's nice to have you to have a laugh.

Already did Dumbo!