Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[SolarLab]

Oh oh!

[rakarskiy]

The more I delve into the subject of electromagnetic generator, the more it is confirmed that public education is turned inside out, so that the bulk of the specialists, in real processes do not understand. It is enough to give information a little crooked and all, there will be a steep deadlock, with lots of contradictions. You take the simplest generator with a magnetic rotor in which the EMF is calculated by the transformer formula (E=4.44ϕf). You change the rotor to a rod, with a primary winding, supply alternating current - already a transformer, in which the transformer formula of EMF does not work.  The inter-torque transfer, which is calculated through the volt-curls, is in effect.

Bravo again Holcomb!

Robert Holcomb's solid state synchronous machine, works on the algorithm of a traditional electromechanical synchronous machine, generating electricity. A solid state rotor is a system of electromagnets that mimic the action of a mechanical magnetic rotor. The task is to create a magnetic excitation flux, hold it and move it in the stator and rotor, synchronously inducing EMF in the generator phases. When a load is connected, the excited current in the phase wires amplifies the magnetic field of the system's magnetic flux. The magnetic flux [ϕ] has a constant component, both for a traditional electromechanical generator machine and for a Holcomb solid state machine. The Holcomb machine, like the synchronous generator, depends heavily on the connected load to create a working rotating field.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2022/06/overunity-holcomb-energy-system.html

[bistander]

Or one might study Armature Reaction.
bi

electrical4u.com/armature-reaction-in-synchronous

https://rb.gy/6xiaa

[rakarskiy]

A good example (the post above) of how something is explained by trying to pull on a globe to explain the operation of a synchronous generator.

Once the current starts flowing through the armature conductor, there is one reverse effect of this current on the main field flux of the alternator (or synchronous generator). This inverse effect is called the armature response in an alternator or synchronous generator. In other words, the effect of the armature (stator) flux on the flux created by the rotor field poles is called the armature response.
We already know that the current-carrying conductor creates its own magnetic field, and this magnetic field affects the main magnetic field of the generator.
It has two undesirable effects: it either distorts the main field or reduces the flux of the main field, or both. They impair the performance of the machine. When the field is distorted, it is known as the cross-magnetization effect. And when the field flux is reduced, it is called the demagnetizing effect

For example the secondary winding of a transformer, does it form a magnetic field in the core? The magnetic field of the transformer is added to or subtracted from the two windings or equal to the field from the field winding.

It is better to understand how the process of induction and interaction - excitation and phasing - takes place. What is no-load, active reactive and capacitive load, why does such an effect as "demagnetization" or "additional magnetization" occur, and most importantly, to what flux, the generator's no-load or operating magnetic flux. Then, what is the main flux of the generator and where does it come from if there is an idling flux.

[onepower]

Rakarskiy

I agree, and we could examine the common definition of armature reaction you posted...

Once the current starts flowing through the armature conductor, there is one reverse effect of this current on the main field flux of the alternator (or synchronous generator). This inverse effect is called the armature response in an alternator or synchronous generator. In other words, the effect of the armature (stator) flux on the flux created by the rotor field poles is called the armature response.
We already know that the current-carrying conductor creates its own magnetic field, and this magnetic field affects the main magnetic field of the generator.
It has two undesirable effects: it either distorts the main field or reduces the flux of the main field, or both. They impair the performance of the machine. When the field is distorted, it is known as the cross-magnetization effect. And when the field flux is reduced, it is called the demagnetizing effect

When I read popular explanations like this I think of Mr. Rogers explaining something. Hey kids this thing the adults call a car works like this, we press a peddle on the floor and the thing under the hood goes bang bang making the wheels go whir whir and down the street we go. It is so deficient in real explanations/concepts and any detail to support them it becomes completely incoherent.

It's funny because all my electrical engineering friends try to pull this nonsense all the time. They use all these big words in common phrases they memorized but don't understand. Then I quiz them, what does that term you just used actually mean, conceptually, can you explain it?. Then they start rambling incoherently and I have to correct them explaining how the scientists who actually invented the term thought otherwise based on there own real experiments I read about in depth.

This is why we have to start at the beginning of electrical theory, do all our own experiments to prove all the basic concepts and build on what we learned. For example, did you know an electron current which flows across a large conductive plate never follows a straight line?. Most people claim electricity follows straight lines, the path of least resistance, shortest path but it's nonsense. I was curious, I'm always curious, so I tracked the current across all kinds of conductive plates with magnetometer/electrometer arrays and it quite literally never follows a straight line.

From what I have heard Holcomb's logic follows a similar pattern. He doesn't buy all the nonsense many seem to be peddling and he does his own experiments to develop his own concepts to determine his own facts. Otherwise were just following along hoping someone knows what there doing which seems like a weak proposition at best.

AC