Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[TommeyReed]

Hi All,

I get it, most of you are investing in the Holcomb energy system. Why else would you back this project.

First of all the Holcomb system can be duplicated with any modified stepper motor, by locking the rotor from spinning. It's nothing more the a rotating transformer with a permanent magnet stationary field or rotor.

Almost like Tom Bearden Motionless  Electromagnetic Generator (MEG). I don't need to explain anything to those who haven't even build a single unit.

But I will have to start building my version of a Holcomb (MEG), just to show just how this high school drop out can do real experiments instead of BS.

This is the MEG unit I built and tested, nothing was greater the a COP of (0.9).....

The biggest problem I have with the Holcomb device is input vs output claims. If anyone has really experiment with transformers, BEMF or flyback effects, there is always a lost do to hysteresis,ohms law and heat.

I believe if these claim are correct, then anyone should be able to simulate the same effects as a Holcomb device, lets work together and experiment with the real world instead of graphics image of flaw formulas.

I will build a  "Orthocyclic Winder RFP" if needed, but not interested in anyone sending me money or planning to sell my design.

Now one interesting point is flyback effects with AC, is it possible by switching the waveform and collecting the return  in the opposite direction of a AC flyback effect? wouldn't this be the first step to explore?

Like all transformers, heat is one of the bigger problems. As the heat increase the magnet field decreases and also effect Hysteresis.

Cooling would also be very important with any magnetic field, each watt (3.412...BTU) of power will generate heat. Efficiency will have to deal with the basics of heat. Also even without  permanent magnet, the alloy is effected with heat that effects output.

I wonder if super cool environment effects efficiency in transformers?

Just a few thoughts....

This is a experiment I did many years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1QuAk2rxcM&t=1s

Tom

[bistander]

Hi TommyReed, et. al. 

Sorry, forgot to mention the "Orthocyclic Winder RFP" closes on Wednesday, 12th of July at 12:00 GMT.

So don't hesitate to at least register your intent to reply via PM.

SL

Much to do about nothing?

Have you checked your F for currently available equipment? See attached photo I snapped of a M.O.T. secondary. Aluminum wire. Likely super cost reduced design/process mass produced coil.
I was a long time member of EMCWA, Electrical Manufacturing and Coil Winding Association attending several annual international conferences. It's a huge industry. Most people don't realize. I'm sure the existing players will welcome the competition you offer.
Carry on.
bi

[rakarskiy]

This is a experiment I did many years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1QuAk2rxcM&t=1s

Tom

TommeyReed, this is a good example of how not to do, if you do not know how it works.
By the way, I have questions about the Berden and Naudin installations, in any case, what is drawn and calculated is not always there in reality.
The answer is their high voltage collector winding. Secondly, a lot of strong magnets makes no sense, in this design, on the contrary, there are very big control problems.
You have to put in the core - the flux from the magnets, the flux from the control coils, the flux from the phase current.
There is another big problem that is not listed in the patent.
Congratulations for trying. It was important to find out why it didn't work.

[SolarLab]

Thanks Fellows,

Tommey, if you can - please down size your picture (kind of screws the page up) - appreciated by everyone.

Bistander - good info, thanks. You're right, "much to do about nothing" - no big deal really, just a little bit of thinking! 

Got the Orthocyclic Winder at the Design Intent stage:

- Use "Open Builds" for mechanical and Flowcode V10 for controller (port to any processor and it's free),
- Approach will use a "Needle" type mechanism (can do both flat rectangular [pole & lap] and round frame [multi-pole]),
- 3D printed coil forms.

Parts are in-stock here so the final CAD and build can begin next week.

Brief example snap shots attached.  Won't try to fix pictures - can't scroll that far right! Whatever, you get the idea...

Anyway, this concludes the "LinGen" Fabrication and Development at this end.

Take care and Good Luck!
SL

[onepower]

Rakarskiy

Do you know the parameters of the "perpetual motion machine"? Does science know?

Yes and yes.

Perpetual- Lasting forever; never-ending, continuing or being so for an indefinitely long time.
Motion- The act or process of changing position or place.
Machine- A physical system of fixed and moving parts that performs a task.

The atom has fixed (Proton) and moving (Electron) parts.
An atom is in perpetual motion and it's parts cannot be created/destroyed or stop moving.
The atom also performs the task of being the building block of all physical things in the known universe.
By definition and for all intensive purposes the atom qualifies as a perpetual motion machine.

The problem seems to be that many choose to view things on a superficial level in a subjective manner.
They build a nano-machine made of a few atoms which performs a task and think it's the holy grail.
Where nature has been building machines from atoms into larger and more complex machines for billions of years.

It also helps to understand logic and reasoning to help spot obvious contradictions.
1)The conservation of Energy demands energy cannot be created/destroyed.
2)The conservation of Mass demands the atoms Proton/Electron cannot be created/destroyed.

If the energy and mass of the atom cannot be created/destroyed then it is by definition perpetual.
What do people think "cannot be created/destroyed" and "perpetual" mean?.
Which is where things get a little weird because anyone claiming "perpetual motion" is not real
obviously doesn't understand the conservation of energy and mass.

AC