Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

...
1)You falsely claimed, "the claimed invention violates the first law of thermodynamics" but also infer nothing can violate it. So which is it?, did the invention violate something you claim cannot be violated or did it not?.
...

Holcomb claims the invention does something which violates the first law. Therefore patent examiner is rejecting the claim as false. It is a false claim. Rejected. Easy to understand.

The examiner's offer to consider proof is generous in my opinion. Of course, he knows the applicant will not deliver such proof.
bi

[onepower]

SL

Please help me out here - so I can better understand how this is all supposed to work.

Define, in as much detail as possible, what "an open source free energy system,"
as you view it, would consist of.
Your definition of an open source free energy system is:
1. -
2. -
3. -

Hey, I can help...

Open Source: The term was based on providing free software or code but changed. It now means to provide others with the information and knowledge required to build or repeat what someone else has accomplished free of any associated costs. Ergo, I would give you the information needed to repeat what I have already done and expect nothing in return.

In English: Open(unobstructed use), Source(the point of origin of something ie. an idea or technology)

Free Energy: Anyone who actually understands what energy is and how it works understands all energy is inherently free. The only supposed cost relates to transforming energy into a more practical form based on ones own understanding of energy. For example, solar energy from the Sun is inherently free and you didn't create or pay for the radiant energy raining down on this planet for billions of years before mankind even existed. The only associated cost relates to transforming said energy into some form we find useful.

In English: Free(no associated cost, independent, not controlled), Energy(the capacity to perform work, kinetic energy or the change on some level which could be transferred or transformed)

In effect, free energy relates to the fact that all energy is inherently free. Ergo, there should be less expensive, cleaner, more intelligent and more practical ways to transform energy than currently utilized. For example, the under-educated hunter/gather mindset think they need to burn stuff for energy but then Einstein and friends found we could convert the inherent motion of particles within an atom into heat as something called "nuclear energy". You see, were learning.

The next step will be the transition from still primitive concepts like fission/fusion/heat into the direct conversion of atomic energy into electricity. Heat is primitive, why convert energy into jiggling atoms as heat requiring much more equipment when we could convert the same energy directly into a linear motion as an electron current?.

AC

[SolarLab]

AC,

Thanks - yea, I get all that, but what really needs definition and clarification is:


It might help a great deal if there where some defined targets and goals.

Including - "from the initial concept", through, "the build", "the manufacture", "the final distribution,"
and "implementation." Show costs, if possible, thru each stage, and repairs, if needed. Application
examples, locale and in general (how and where).  Minimum requirements, etc.. be specific.

Your interpretation of the whole process of an "open source free energy system." What is it exactly?

OK, the scheme, schematics and build information are freely available - so, how, specifically, does that save the world?

How is this "World saving open source free energy system accomplished?"    Specifically? How is this all done - in detail?

SL

[SolarLab]

. BTW - Patents are "open source" in the sense they are written such that
it is assumed that "one skilled in the art" can replicate the scheme as presented.

Also, you can build a scheme based the patent for experimental purposes or for
your own individual personal use. You just can't sell it - if you do you will have to forfit any profits and
costs to the initial inventor.

So, a patent is in effect "open source" at the individual level. But it doesn't solve the
Worlds Free Energy quest; other than on an individual level - and most are not "skilled in the art." 

We're still stuck with the problem of "How is this "World saving open source free energy system accomplished?"

There is a simple answer if you think about it!

SL

[sm0ky2]

By definition, open source is public information
every technology developed here on this forum is,
and always will be Open Source, and held in the public realm.


Stephan has built and maintained this ideology for over 30 years
Open Source and the free sharing of information is the single most important
aspect of our community, and is the basis of 'what we do' here.


Whether or not a technology we are working on proves to be true "overunity" or simply a better way to use or harvest energy (like the joule thief, or the solar death ray),
the information we share with the world will always be freely available.
Unpatentable by law


Can your company make and sell a product based on open source technologies?
Sure
But no one entity can ever own exclusive rights to any of it. That is the major point


At the end of the day, this battle is much larger than 'just having free stuff'
This is about breaking free from the control systems that have perverted our energy supply
That starve the people of the world
That siphon 90% of everyones income


Eliminating the need for polluting fuels and dangerous technologies
Improving our way of lives


The things owning a patent can never achieve


As history has shown us, the powers that be will only buy your patent
Shelf the technology
and continue to do what they have always done.....