Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

  Then why every transformer isn't OU?
Listen, everyone who graduated secondary school knows what permeability is and that ferromagnetic materials amplify weak magnetic field.
As soon as you want to utilise that amplified magnetic field and current is flowing in the output coil-Lenz law applies, and small current in the output coil is enough to create opposite amplified magnetic field counter reacting  amplified magnetic field created by inducing current from the input coil. It works both ways.


Cheers,
Pix

Yes Pix, you have everything correctly explained...plus, you've answered your own question about why there is no OU in any transformer.


Lenz Law...period.


I will try (again) to explain this...


In a Transformer, both Magnetic Fields (Primary-Secondary) are constrained to the same steel core, so they have no other choice but to react against each others, giving the results we all know.


Believe me about this...Once we get the Magnetic Field of the Primary (or Exciter/Inductor, for the Generator case), to Mutate (move, translate) in Space/Time through the steel cores, Lenz can not act, period...it just bounces back and forth*, but we will see almost no increase (like 1 or 2 tents of an Amp) on the Input Currents...


Lenz can not act against a massless, frictionless moving magnetic field through Space/Time.


I have done it, I have observed it...I am just making a better build.




So, briefly resuming this:


The output coils and core, whenever loaded, this Reacting Magnetic Field is constrained to its own core-coils...However, where the massless field is displacing through space/time is definitively NOT constrained to its own core-coils...and Lenz can not "catch it"...no matter how much "tantrum" in vibrations and jumping it does...
And...if this Magnetic Field, generated once we add a load,  can not act directly and against our moving Magnetic Field...then there is simply not increase at Input.




Cheers


*In my testing, the armature which has the moving magnetic field, will just bounce, since I left it loose on purpose, for a physical and sound demo...so, as soon as a load is applied to output coils, it increases the sound and vibrations...but no increase at Input.




Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

This topic has already mentioned the guy's experiment with the rotation of the field in the stator gland from the engine, through the electromagnet control system.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wn49fDHCHdo

The secondary circuit for the output of the phase is organized through a coil wound on the core and inserted as a jumper. (А)
To do it right, the second block of the core with grooves and lay the wires according to the rules of generator phase winding. (В)

[Ufopolitics]

Yes Rakarski, that is Pierre Cotnoir...


Almost everyone knows him here...
There is a Thread also here...which is abandoned now.


Same thing, different "color"...He is rotating the Field on the outside core (a typical stator) and collecting on the inside as the lonely core.




Regards




Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

The secondary circuit for the output of the phase is organized through a coil wound on the core and inserted as a jumper. (А)
To do it right, the second block of the core with grooves and lay the wires according to the rules of generator phase winding. (В)

Yes, you are very correct Rakarskiy.
The best way to collect on this setup, is not "A" but "B" setup on the inside...that way it would be 360º sweep of exciter (Inductor) over the Induced .


However, still with a single coil, 700 ft of wire and a heavy core as (A), Pierre was able to loop his setup.


I have also have being doing it the "structural" correct way (B) since many years ago...see image


However, I was doing it wrong, by allowing Field to collapse during rotation...not good.




Cheers




Ufopolitics

[Lunkster]

Hi everyone,

I have Been reading most of these posts about this new technology.
I am a hobbyist who writes books for hobbyists to read and experiment from those ideas.
So I am not up to the intellectual level as a lot of you.
But I have an idea.

What if a few people on this forum bought one of the first self-contained units and
performed all kinds of testing on it.  Would that not answer a lot of questions about the
operation and technological questions on how it works.

By doing this,  I am sure that there would be other ideas on how to improve on the technology.
These new improvements in themselves could be patentable, although I am an open source guy myself.

I believe that the more people get there hands dirty and build something, that faster OU products
will hit the market.

I truly like the idea of no moving parts in a generator.  This is the way to the future in my mind.

I am going to build a "Motionless Switching Magnetosphere Electric Generator" from this forum.
There are other motionless generators of interest as well at this forum.

I have learned a lot from everyone's input and I hope some of you will take up the interest and purchase
one of Holcomb's self-contained generators and experiment with it and show the testing
results on this forum.

We are all benefitting from each other.
Thank you all for your inputs.

Jay Lunke known at Lunster