Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

I want to inform you that the Holcomb system, like any other solid-state electromagnetic generator, including a synchronous electromechanical one, where the stator has slots, operates on a speed change system. The speed, paradoxically, is magnetic induction.
Magnetic induction is measured in Tesla and Gauss: 1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter.
***********
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_flux
***********
...

Hi rakarskiy,
You say "1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter."
That is incorrect.
1 Tesla = 1 Weber per square meter. 1 Weber = 1 Volt • second. Therefore 1 T = 1 volt • second per square meter, not as you say.
bi

[rakarskiy]

Hi rakarskiy,
You say "1 T = 1 volt per second per square meter, and 1 gauss = 0.0001 volt per second per square meter."
That is incorrect.
1 Tesla = 1 Weber per square meter. 1 Weber = 1 Volt • second. Therefore 1 T = 1 volt • second per square meter, not as you say.
bi

bistander,
Thanks for the good point, I didn't specify what the difference is. This difference is really significant. You can say "per second - n / s" or "" for a period of time "seconds n * s"
(* clarification Google will translate from Russian "в секунду" and "за секунду" is always "per second", in Russian this is the difference)
in the first variant, the expression refers to the parameter of the action at the moment of time (for example, the speed of the flow of water, the point moves on a segment m / s)
in the second option, the expression refers to the quantity parameter over a period of time (for example, Watt * hour, Watt * second)

Since "voltage = speed" when comparing electromagnetism and mechanics, we can conditionally put an equal sign  U (V) = v^ 2 (m^ 2/s^ 2)

Thus, 1 Tesla is a parameter of the speed of the magnetic flux (no density or force). We change the speed in the time interval, we get the corresponding parameter of the electric voltage around the conductor.

Е = q /(ε₀r^2)

The difference with the electrostatic field is only in its exceptional vortex structure (this is a dynamic electric field). Does not exist without a cause of its generative, at any given time.

Next, the basic formulas for EMF (vortex electric field)!

Е =dФ/dt  ( Ф=BS),    E = B*L*v,  E = 4.44*k*w*f*Ф 

At point-blank range, I do not see the manifestation of the Lorentz force. And the minus sign in the formula (Е = - dФ/dt) is absurd.

The reason is the same, the algorithm is the same, there are no Newtonian forces or even similarity. Forces are manifested only by the fact of counteraction / interaction of magnetic fields. In a conductor, the strength of the magnetic field is expressed in terms of current strength (in fact, this is the vortex magnetic field).

The strength of the current in the conductor, this is the result of the internal properties of a closed circuit, relates to an external magnetic field through the process of formation of an EMF. The current strength is related to the Ampere Force, and I have already specified how the EMF is involved here

http://rakarskiy.narod.ru/publ/free_energy_systems/rezultirujushhaja_sila_ampera/3-1-0-146


PS
the most interesting, what kind of animal is the magnetic flux, we do not answer. Perhaps this is the very structured ether about which there are disputes.

   

[rakarskiy]

rakarskiy,

Your "solution" linking material forces, magnetics, and electromagnetics appears, for me at least, to be quite brilliant!
A "speed" or velocity element [squared] is found in nearly every system, and the equations used to describe them
[per second per square meter].

To quote, in part, from your writings (this is worth repeating in my opinion):

"In mechanics, speed works. And the capaticance of an electric capacitor is the charge (charge capacity)
divided by the voltage (we read the speed)."  [dx/dt]   "Next, we draw a conclusion about the mechanism
of electromagnetic induction, and another type of hidden induction, on which other solid-state devices
probably work (Kapanadze, S Mark ..)"

Linking "electromagnetic and mechanical" systems via "spin permeability of vacuum" is indeed a "very tricky moment."
A while back High Voltage was linked to the operation of devices similar to Kapanadze, Ruslan and Stalker but a detailed
physics connection was vague at best. Ref:

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&topic=4154.msg96356#msg96356

Your conclusion may well be that missing link.

This video might also be of interest:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0BOpiMQXQA
Thanks for sharing your insight and best regards,
SL

Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an "element of concentration", used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=tkjqdoee4vq0ppjto421pt59q6&action=dlattach;topic=4154.0;attach=40758;image

That is, according to the abbreviation from the Kapanadze scheme - "current amplifier". I described the principle and physics above.

My simple version of the device according to this principle in the figure  https://strannik-2.ru/media/kunena/attachments/587/525258.jpg


This is the base, everything else is engineering creativity.

Sincerely.

PS
Formula:  E=mc^2,  can be read as follows, that a particle with a mass (m), upon reaching the speed of light squared (c^2), becomes light.

[pix]

Greetings, SolarLab!

This is not my decision, these are Russian-speaking physicists who are engaged in science. I just took as a basis in the study.

If you are looking for an answer, where does the "additional energy" come from in the systems of electrostatic circuits, I will answer you "It is taken from a third-party electric field."

Quote from a high school physics textbook "One of the main ways of generating electric current in the body of a conductor is the creation and maintenance of an electric field in them (my editing around them)."

Ohm's law, (which for some reason is not fundamental). Ohm's law is mathematically expressed by the formula: I = λE, where: λ is the conductivity of the conductor material, then ρ = 1/λ, hence the well-known Ohm formula is derived: I = U/R

In physics, there is such a concept of EMF (E) as an "element of concentration", used to describe the operation of galvanic sources. In a simple concept, you need a third-party source of EMF (E from the side) to maintain current in the conductor. The mathematical formula looks like this: I = λ(E+E from the side)

In conductors, there is such a thing as electrostatic induction. Where an external electric field immediately causes the polarization of the conductor. So, the mechanism of conductor polarization is a manifestation of the potential difference of the electric field at the ends of the conductor. Actually the same EMF (vortex electric field). I see no difference in the end result, with the appearance of EMF around the conductor through electromagnetic induction.

This device is just designed to create electrostatic induction with the formation of an EMF on the surface of a conductor stretched through it.

Electrostatic induction is not OU. You have to maintain source charge to induce  exact opposite charge in conductor.
Tried this concept. It works, there is flow of current from the ground, but load on HV drive also rises.


Cheers,
Pix


PS. "Grenade" coil is just a transmission line. It is wound this way to squeeze certain length of conductor and minimise inductance.

[rakarskiy]

Electrostatic induction is not OU. You have to maintain source charge to induce  exact opposite charge in conductor.
Tried this concept. It works, there is flow of current from the ground, but load on HV drive also rises.

Cheers,
Pix

PS. "Grenade" coil is just a transmission line. It is wound this way to squeeze certain length of conductor and minimise inductance.

pix,

In mechanics, there is such an effect - "exomechanical", when two sources of torque (static and dynamic) act on the same load. A crank press with a flywheel works on this principle. One trouble is not a constant action, but by periods of charge-discharge (it is on this principle that the "Earth Engine" installation of the Energy Inductance Company works.
The principle that I am describing provides for the low-cost creation of an electric field for a reactor, with electrostatic induction on a conductor closed in a circuit with a load. In my version, two circuits are connected into one. We get an analogy with mechanics.
I'm glad that you have your opinion, but I won't give up mine until I check it.
Earth in my version is needed only as a zero driver for a high-voltage circuit, but the system can work without earth at all.

Sincerely.