Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[ramset]

Solarlab did post some analysis work on HES (Holcomb Energy Systems)
At AllCanadian's Topic below .
https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg98903;topicseen#msg98903

This type analysis Seems a worthwhile perspective towards understanding ... other plausible routes towards harvesting Energy In a unique or new way !

And of course... SolarLab's work is open source FE effort!


Solarlab
Quote
By taking the time and effort required to validate this technique could prove very worthwhile in the end to, hopefully, more than just a few FE/CE "expert " tinkerers!
End quote !


No stone left unturned...


Respectfully
Chet K

[rakarskiy]

Really, obvious things, it is necessary to prove?
Ask yourself how does a modern synchronous generator work, in which the windings are laid in closed slots? You will be surprised, but the Lorentz force does not work there, the reason for the EMF is magnetic induction, which changes with time.

A few theses from my book about such a system (I also calculate and design it), for the event "think with your brain"!

A change in the magnetic flux penetrating a closed circuit can occur for two reasons:
• the magnetic flux changes due to the movement of the circuit or its parts in a magnetic field constant in time. This is the case when the conductors, and with them the "free charge carriers", move in a magnetic field;
• The second reason for the change in the magnetic flux penetrating the circuit is the change in time of the magnetic field when the circuit is stationary. In this case, the occurrence of the induction EMF can no longer be explained by the action of the Lorentz force. The phenomenon of electromagnetic induction in fixed conductors, which occurs when the surrounding magnetic field changes, is also described by the Faraday formula.

Thus, the phenomena of induction in moving and stationary conductors proceed in the same way, but the physical cause of the occurrence of the inductive current turns out to be different in these two cases:
• in the case of moving conductors, the EMF of induction is due to the Lorentz force (I wonder with what fright);
• in the case of fixed conductors, the EMF of induction is a consequence of the action on free charges of a vortex electric field that occurs when the magnetic field changes.

Explanations for the occurrence of induction current:
• Current in the circuit can exist when external forces act on free charges. The work of these forces in moving a single positive charge along a closed loop is equal to the EMF. This means that when the number of magnetic lines changes through the surface bounded by the contour, an EMF appears in it, which is called the EMF of induction.
• Electrons in a stationary conductor can only be set in motion by an electric field. This electric field is generated by a time-varying magnetic field. It is called the vortex electric field. The concept of a vortex electric field was introduced into physics by the great English physicist J. Maxwell in 1861.

Never trust someone else's opinion, it can be erroneous or, even worse, obviously false. Check everything yourself, but for this you will have to study the subject that you want to evaluate.

Physics does not deny such a design! Physics gives a clear formulation on what principles such an installation can exist. Everything else is engineering.

Everyone, good personal discoveries, the knowledge that has already been discovered earlier!

My slide is about how the concepts in Figueira's patent have changed for public perception: a gap for laying a phase wire converted into a coil, with an external winding on the core, as a result, everything rests on the wall.

[Ufopolitics]

You are wrong. I have, and others have, shown links and references showing a single constant magnitude flux field rotating in the air gap arising from 3-phase AC. All 3-phase induction motors, as well as other AC machines, use this. Every EE text book I've seen covers this theory and the lecturer covers it in class, as well as experiments required with electric machinery and power conversion labs.

I have never referred on my post that you've quoted above, to a "FLUX FIELD", but to a SINGULARLY ORIGINATED, MAIN MAGNETIC FIELD.

So, you are referring to the "end product" or the "result" from the sum of all individual fields which add up to configure a single flux field.

It should be very obvious to anyone "Skilled in the Arts"    that any given number of Magnetic Fields, generated by coils which are aligned in a circular-horizontally and spatially apart array, overlapped and then synchronized in a phase continuity, will ADD UP, SUM UP, to generate a "SINGLE, CONSTANT, FLUX FIELD" which simply follows that rotary pattern given, generated by a phase sequence, as simple as 1, 2 and 3...over time.

So please continue, but take note that you are a minority claiming polyphase AC can not produce a traveling flux field. You are flat out wrong.

Again Bistander, you are confusing a flux field generated by several coils aligned, and flashing alternated currents in a phase sequence, then summed up...with a single originated magnetic field, which is stationary, until I start driving it in a rotary fashion., by adding and substracting in an orderly sequential fashion.


Two Brushes are feeding a series-parallel circuit of coils, which generates a Singular Magnetic Field.


Apples versus Bananas Bistander...


And of course I will continue...get ready, if you are under stress medication, I highly recommend you do not miss a single dose...

In fact, would not the pulsing DC you feed to the coils actually constitute AC.
bi

It could...because coils keep reversing currents, however, have in mind these are groups of series-parallel coils, fed by a single (plus-minus) input...




Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

@Rakarskiy


Clemente Figuera is a waste of time...I tried it in so many ways...all I observed was an increase in output amperage...but voltage kept being very low.


If you look again at the graphic you have posted last, see how much Figuera is investing on Inductors (exciters) to just a single coil sandwhiched in between.


This arrangement is not necesary, if he would have gone differently about his primary way to think about the way a generator works...insufficient thoughts.


Paraphrasing his thoughts:


Spanish original Language: "Si notamos como las espiras que generan el campo magnético de un generador funcionan, ellas se aproximan para luego alejarse..."


English: "If we notice how the coils that generate the magnetic field in a generator works, the magnetic field is approaching then leaving...approach, leave..."


This led him to reproduce that "effect"...which is not a fully rotational field...but simulates an approach (by increasing currents) and leaving (by decreasing currents), or "ramp up, ramp down"...and yes, obviously the field does that...but can not compare with a full rotary motion, which have the progression over time, plus the horizontally "passing by" of the magnetic field through the induced coils.


Figuera is simply about "amplifying" and "reducing" the Magnetic Field...if we look at what this effect does to the field spectrum, or the "imaginary lines of force" we could resume it is a very weak movement related to a translation analysis of the spectrum, like a full rotation would do.



Cheers



Ufopolitics

[rakarskiy]

Ufopolitics, the problem is in modeling the design of the generator.

I gave an example with the calculation of the magnetic induction of a toroidal coil on a ferromagnetic ring in an air frame.

If this ring of ferromagnetic material is made with a notch, at least 1 mm, the magnetic induction index will sharply change downwards.

There are many different nuances, I hope to finish my material soon and it will become available to everyone.