Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,
You say "A Car Alternator is designed to put out more Amperage than Voltage...is that a wrong statement?"
A wrong statement? I don't know. It is a stupid statement. More Amperage than Voltage?  Electric potential difference and current are quite different quantities with completely different units. What sense does it make to compare the numerical values of the two? Are you saying that the automotive alternator is a high current low voltage device? Then the answer needs qualification like "compared to what?" Compared to the cranking motor, then not particularly. Compared to the wiper motor, yes.

You play "the stupid" whenever it is convenient...
I said Analyzing the Car Alternator as a sole Generating Unit.
"Compared to what?">>>Compared to a typical Industrial or Home Generator.(3PH, 2PH, 1PH)
Where the Voltage is always HIGHER than the Amperage.
Ampertage and Voltage are the TWO used Parameters to calculate Power (Watts)


Originally I posted my opinion to respond to Rakarskiy's post about his example analysis of the Car Alternator...
He was relating it and comparing it to this Topic, which is the Holcomb Generator.


But then you started your attack against whatever I wrote...


I am gonna have to opt to IGNORE YOU and all your replies to whatever I post.




Ufopolitics

[bistander]

The "big deal" or better called "bad efficiency" is precisely that...the way flux is redirected and angled at 90º and fractured into smaller, multiple poles...a waste.

If this design method would be ¨so efficient¨ then why it is not applied in ALL the High Voltage, High Amperage, Industrial and Home Generators?
Nope, ALL Rotary Generators Home and Industrial, use the DIRECT, STRAIGHT ANGLE, MAGNETIC POLE FACE TO STATOR FACE OPERATION, period!!
...Then I wonder why not using the Lundell "Design Technique"?...
...
Ufopolitics

I think this paper explains the topology, bending flux and dividing paths, pretty well. Take a look at the diagrams, 20 of them I think. Adaptations of MPM, of Lundell (claws).

https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/7173/htm#

There are many factors which determine the design details for the application. Even with the rotten power efficiency of the old $5 Lundell car alternator, it was a marvel. I appreciate electric machinery for what it is and can be. You crap on it every chance you get. Why is that? You don't understand it. Where would you be without it? Cranking by hand to start your car, on horseback, or going nowhere?
bi

[bistander]

You play "the stupid" whenever it is convenient...
I said Analyzing the Car Alternator as a sole Generating Unit.
"Compared to what?">>>Compared to a typical Industrial or Home Generator.(3PH, 2PH, 1PH)
Where the Voltage is always HIGHER than the Amperage.
Ampertage and Voltage are the TWO used Parameters to calculate Power (Watts)


Originally I posted my opinion to respond to Rakarskiy's post about his example analysis of the Car Alternator...
He was relating it and comparing it to this Topic, which is the Holcomb Generator.


But then you started your attack against whatever I wrote...


I am gonna have to opt to IGNORE YOU and all your replies to whatever I post.

Ufopolitics

Ufo,
I use what you say, the words in you post. I know you were responding to the other member, but it wasn't a private message. I'm entitled to post my opinion. Which I do when I see misinformation and falsehoods. It is that which I attack, not you. In fact, I try to help you. But you're stubborn. Like 3 years ago, you start with moving main field in stationary steel and copper. And you still don't get it. 3-phase induction motor stator... Bingo...you got it. So go ahead, ignore me, delete me. Good luck.
bi

[rakarskiy]

In vain you staged a controversy! Which shakes the topic, the wrong steppe.

Dr. Holcomb has a patent for a solid state rotor (this is essentially an analogue of an electromagnetic rotor for electromechanical machines).

https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/7d/d1/d7/018fe4892a4d9e/US20190238011A1.pdf

The text clearly states that this solid state rotor can be a replacement for the electromagnetic rotor in electromechanical generators.
Evolution slide

--------
The example I gave, of an automotive alternator, shows the cost of driving an electromagnet and the result of phase power output
Unfortunately, such a simple example did not cause understanding of the technology.
I also provided a link to a section of physics that explains this difference.

https://rakatskiy.blogspot.com/2018/12/permanent-magnet-constant-device.html


It is this effect (intensification of the magnetic field, in electrical steel) that is used in all synchronous generators with electromagnetic excitation to create the corresponding magnetic induction in the wire zone in the core groove.

   

[listener192]

Just to be clear.. Holcomb has several patent applications.


No patent has yet been granted on this device.


L192