Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[Ufopolitics]

[...]

This is the main mistake of those who think that it is so easy to insert the stator of an induction motor to form a rotating excitation field. Or they do it on purpose to lead the layman into a dead end.
[...]

@Rakarskiy

I see it exactly as you wrote above, on the bold out statement.
Definitively we are dealing here with people who have proven to be "Knowledgeable of the Arts"...
And I, have explained to EXHAUSTION, the HUGE Differences between AC 3 Phase versus Holcomb...
But they "play" like they do not "understand" the differences...

And I know they know exactly the huge differences between a Three Pole, 2 stators, three tooth dc motor armature, versus a 20 poles, Four Stator, 28 tooth Rotor on the exact same motor principle...They know exactly which motor is more powerful and more effective.

So, yes, it is definitively on purpose, with the main objective to establish the same conclusion...a dead end, to create deception on these principles of static generation of energy...not only Holcomb.

Sincerely

Ufopolitics

[bistander]

@Rakarskiy

I see it exactly as you wrote above, on the bold out statement.
Definitively we are dealing here with people who have proven to know about "the Arts"...
I have explained to EXHAUSTION, the HUGE Differences between AC 3 Phase versus Holcomb...
But they "play" like they do not "understand" the differences...

And I know they know exactly the huge differences between a Three Pole, 2 stators, three tooth dc motor armature, versus a 20 poles, Four Stator, 28 tooth Rotor on the exact same motor principle...They know exactly which motor is more powerful and more effective.

So, yes, it is definitively on purpose, with the main objective to establish the same conclusion...a dead end.

Sincerely

Ufopolitics

Ufo,
I assume that you refer to me. And you are definitely wrong. I don't see a difference in the moving magnetic field or RMF between methods.

My objective in bringing the 3- phase AC generated RMF to your attention is to save years of fussing around to get to the point of being able to progress with your experiment using the RMF. It's the same thing. Now you have it your way, so show us why it's so important.

I am not fooling when I tell you that I hope for your success.  I do. But I see you make so many mistakes, and express so many misconceptions, I doubt that you can recognize and differentiate anomalous occurrence from the norm. At least, from what I can see, you post up your results for scrutiny. More than I can say for some others.

Good luck, seriously.
bi

[rakarskiy]

@Rakarskiy

I see it exactly as you wrote above, on the bold out statement.
Definitively we are dealing here with people who have proven to be "Knowledgeable of the Arts"...
And I, have explained to EXHAUSTION, the HUGE Differences between AC 3 Phase versus Holcomb...
But they "play" like they do not "understand" the differences...

And I know they know exactly the huge differences between a Three Pole, 2 stators, three tooth dc motor armature, versus a 20 poles, Four Stator, 28 tooth Rotor on the exact same motor principle...They know exactly which motor is more powerful and more effective.

So, yes, it is definitively on purpose, with the main objective to establish the same conclusion...a dead end, to create deception on these principles of static generation of energy...not only Holcomb.

Sincerely

Ufopolitics

UFO Hello!

You posted good links about Russell. I will tell you a big secret, in a synchronous generator, when laying a phase in a groove, a similar situation occurs - Focusing. You will not find this in any textbook in the relevant disciplines. This is taught to design engineers after appropriate selection. The rest have reference stereotypes.

The problem with installing Holcomb is not that it works and has an OU, but that it is relevant for power producers. Are you sure that you are not buying energy through the meter that such devices did not produce? I know for a fact that Holcomb is already being scolded for what he can and cannot do. The system allows or denies. To do this, they have all the levers in any condition.

As for the "trolls", who deny far from everything in the service of the system. Many of them are victims of stereotypes embedded in their education. I have a good engineer friend. So, for the simplest task: calculate the EMF of the generator phase, with a load of 1 kW, a network frequency of 50 Hz and a voltage at the generator terminals of 220 volts. In the circuit, only a resistive load of 1kW and a generator phase. His answer was "220V, you yourself indicated". He simply does not know how the current is formed in the circuit and what needs to be provided for this.

If you read one interesting post above, then even in this thread, you can decide that they are hinting to be silent!

Sincerely

[Beginners Mind]

SEMI - Perhaps some of this information will help with the questions you posted:

On page 50 of patent application WO2021063522A1 it says, "The current flow is "titrated" to just below the saturation of the electrical steel of the rotor pole.  This saturation is predetermined for each pole by performing a hysteresis curve such as that in FIG 50A."

For a generator with an inner stator - double rotor - double stator - outer rotor configuration:  Pages 43 - 44 list the wire gauge and number of turns for each of the stators and rotors of this generator configuration shown in FIG 33 - 38.  Dimensions of this generator may be inferred from FIG 34A. 

For a generator with an inner rotor - double stator - outer rotor configuration:  Page 43 lists the wire gauge and number of turns for the outer rotor and outer stator of this generator configuration shown in FIG 22 - 25.  Unfortunately it does not list the gauge and number of turns for the inner stator or inner rotor.  Dimensions of this generator are not given.  Page 41 section 10 indicates that the magnetic fields of the two rotors in this inner rotor - double stator - outer rotor generator are in opposition, so the coils of the sandwiched double stator are bucking coils.

For a simple generator with an inner rotor - outer stator configuration:  To my knowledge none of the patents lists dimensions, wire gauge or number of turns for this configuration.  If you run across such information please post it.

[bistander]

Hi all, ... So here's my question to anybody. How is HES different from a slip ring induction motor at stall?
...
Thanks.
bi

Anybody?