Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[kolbacict]

Radio Wave is another name for electromagnetic wave so one cannot become or evolve to the other.

Why do I have 10W RF power. 100MHz. and 10MHz. allocates the same amount of heat in a matched load, and matched cable?  After all, we know that the energy of an electromagnetic wave quantum increases in proportion to the frequency. So the heat should be ten times more.

[forest]

skin effect ?

[stivep]

Why do I have 10W RF power. 100MHz. and 10MHz. allocates the same amount of heat in a matched load, and matched cable?  After all, we know that the energy of an electromagnetic wave quantum increases in proportion to the frequency. So the heat should be ten times more.

Answer to your previous post.

Radio Wave is another name for electromagnetic wave ^{( of given bandwidth)} so one cannot become or evolve to the other.

30 hertz to 300 GHz. Electromagnetic waves is in this frequency range, called radio waves,
https://en.wikipedia.org
__________________________________________________



Frequency vs energy of electromagnetic wave.
https://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/science/toolbox/spectrum_chart.html

How are frequency and energy in electromagnetic waves related?
https://socratic.org/questions/how-are-frequency-and-energy-in-electromagnetic-waves-related

the last link you may skip as too extended covering of subject matter  :
https://opentextbc.ca/universityphysicsv2openstax/chapter/energy-carried-by-electromagnetic-waves/

Wesley

[SolarLab]

out of subject.
you didn't respond to the subject matter with answers.
It is not nice to respond with question  to the question/sI'm not your enemy. Please prove me wrong.
Wesley

OK,

Lets clairify a few things:

1. Set a BASELINE for discussions and answers (what is your fundamental knowledge base?) so that we are all on
the same page and using common nomenclature and definitions.

2. More often than not (with you anyway) it is essential to respond to your (out of the ass) questions with clarification
questions. This avoids the dodging and obfucation often encountered when pinpointing the exact solution.

3. The topic of this forum discussion is "Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world" not some
EM theory debate.

4. Using EM CAE tools to analyze, design and varify the Holcomb methods and techniques was the latest set of posts;
therefore acquiring and using these (free in some cases) tools is of importance (not some diatribe about the religion
of some foreign nation or conflict or who's the enemy).

5. So, let me ask again to set the BASELINE for further discussion:

HAVE YOU EVER USED ANY OF THE FULL 3D EM CAE TOOLS TO ANALYZE OR DESIGN ELECTROMAGNETIC DEVICES?

Without a simple, straight forward, answer I CAN NOT HELP YOU. Sorry!

You will have to direct your comments and questions elsewhere.

SL

[stivep]

Again the same behavior is manifested by you.
Set of questions and/or statements in my previous post addressed to you requires your response.
If you don't understand something please quote it and  explain why.
but don't respond with question to the question.
Expected answer  of yours is supposedly  proving me wrong or accepting the content  included there.
If you disagree than please explain why?
Use or not use of specific "tools" doesn't affect the content because in 20th century, before computers, the same results were achieved.

I see your progress in last few years as promising.
I respect you and your value
but everyone might be top-notch in something.
You stepped into area of my specialty - electromagnetic waves and particle physics.
I would love to be wrong, as this is  one of elements of progress.
Wesley