Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

And as no frame of reference or explanation is given for that graph it can be filed under 'Useless speculation' or 'Waste of time'.

Let's move on.

I can move on, but I've noticed dozens of 'hints' in reading the literature from this outfit that tell me they lack basic comprehension of the fundamentals.

And since you brought up magnetic circuits, have you, or anyone taken a look at his LinGen in that regard. I hoped SL would show that on FEMM. There you have one stator and one 'rotor' and just 2 poles.
bi

[Jimboot]

Looks like I got the chalice from the palace. Will delete "it doesn't work" posts . I think AC may have another thread where that can be discussed. So have at it over there. Edit. https://overunity.com/19206/holcomb-energy-systems-working-theory/msg569684/#new This thread will be for building, not defaming or name calling.


If anyone is confused by the number of patents I suggest you watch Ellen Holcomb's presentation to investors referenced earlier in the thread. She goes through the evolution of the device from the one with 47 spinning rotors to the solid state version now shipping. Certainly clarified a few things for me.


As far as I'm concerned science struggles to explain much of our natural world. My attitude is if I think the device could work I'll have a go at building it. If it breaks someone's laws along the way, not my problem if it does indeed work. But as I said at the start, I won't be absolutely convinced until I see something self running.

[Cadman]

I can move on, but I've noticed dozens of 'hints' in reading the literature from this outfit that tell me they lack basic comprehension of the fundamentals.

And since you brought up magnetic circuits, have you, or anyone taken a look at his LinGen in that regard. I hoped SL would show that on FEMM. There you have one stator and one 'rotor' and just 2 poles.
bi

bi,

I'm as skeptical as the next person about the HES and I won't believe it until I see it. Too many in the past have proven to be cons.

However the HES does intrigue me a great deal.

I have a pulsed DC experiment that shows an apparent cop>2. I can't explain it in any way other than the extra is produced by a changing magnetic field in iron. Is that correct? I don't know but that doesn't mean the result does not exist. Apparently it does. I can only produce the result from a single 1 ms pulse at this time and the extra takes 220 ms to fully manifest so right now it's pretty useless. But the apparent OU is there whether I grasp the basic fundamentals or know the correct terminology or not.

Getting right down to it, the HES self runner using DC as the source is a pulsed DC system claiming the extra comes from the electrical steel. If I can produce an apparent OU, even for a fraction of a second, from something similar then I cannot discount HES out of hand.

[Jimboot]

bi,

I'm as skeptical as the next person about the HES and I won't believe it until I see it. Too many in the past have proven to be cons.

However the HES does intrigue me a great deal.

I have a pulsed DC experiment that shows an apparent cop>2. I can't explain it in any way other than the extra is produced by a changing magnetic field in iron. Is that correct? I don't know but that doesn't mean the result does not exist. Apparently it does. I can only produce the result from a single 1 ms pulse at this time and the extra takes 220 ms to fully manifest so right now it's pretty useless. But the apparent OU is there whether I grasp the basic fundamentals or know the correct terminology or not.

Getting right down to it, the HES self runner using DC as the source is a pulsed DC system claiming the extra comes from the electrical steel. If I can produce an apparent OU, even for a fraction of a second, from something similar then I cannot discount HES out of hand.

I've seen enough playing with this to make me want to build something bigger. I haven't got near what UFO is showing there (nice work) but I know I can generate a strong magnetic field for less than a watt on other devices with the right coils. Getting a mag field chasing itself cheaply does not seem out of the question

[Lunkster]

Hi,

I have a question:
The Holcomb designs look like the original design was for a rotating generator.
Was the physical design for this generator originally suppose to rotate?
OR, was the design purposely made similar to rotating generators for
the easier manufacturing of the generator. Or, why?

The reason I ask is because other motionless generators look so much
different than his designs.  It sure would by nice to see some of the prototypes
that Holcomb went through to get to the current designs.

It would be nice to know the "Ah Ha" moments during the many years of
the development of these devices.

Does anyone know of some of those moments?

Lunkster