Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[ramset]

You should reapply ..forum was closed for a long time to membership
do to bots making a mess and other things !
And administrator having Zero time for such nonsense ( here it's the same)
Always appreciate reading your thoughtful and sincere contributions!
Respectfully
Chet

[SolarLab]

Hello SL,
I apologize for putting a reply to this old post of yours, but turns out it is pertinent to a point which I wanted to address on your recent our.com post. I am not a member there although I follow it. I attempted to join years ago but was ignored. So here's a cut/paste of the subject post:
______
See the attached .pdf for a brief explaination of the analytics (formulas) involved, including
a link to a good online physics calculator for iterative solving of "Faraday's Law."

Hopefully this is easy to understand for everyone and of some value!

SL


------------------------

 LinGen Technical Brief -Analytic-.pdf (217.78 kB - downloaded 13 times.)

_________

https://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=4261.msg102190;topicseen#msg102190
Reply#416

________

First off, in the pdf you state H to have units of Amperes/Turns. Is this a typo?

I have some more discussion, but need to take a break and wish to see if I get your attention over here.

Thanks,
bi

"Amperes/Turns" is generic - use whatever "Units/Nomenclature" is shown on your B-H Curve graph.
Convert as required or needed. 

See the attached file which might justify my use of a "generic."

[bistander]

"Amperes/Turns" is generic - use whatever "Units/Nomenclature" is shown on your B-H Curve graph.
Convert as required or needed.

Thanks for reply.
I don't think I've ever seen amps/turn used. Except for the old term of oersted, A/m is always used for H units in the B H curve. This article sums it nicely in my opinion.
https://www.toppr.com/guides/physics-formulas/magnetic-field-strength-formula/

I have attached two images for easy reference.

I have been trying to follow your analysis but need some help. Would you explain where the parameters used in your PDF originate. For example: 20 turns for the lap winding. It appears like 5 turns on your diagram.
Another question, about the 15 sq.in. area: This is the area of a pole face isn't it? Shouldn't it be half that (for a 2-pole machine)?
And about the magnetic circuit, you use a B value of 0.8T (arbitrary) which I assume is intended as an average uniform flux density per pole. Would not this cause severe saturation elsewhere? Like the back iron or areas referred to as 'depth below slots'.

I would appreciate your assistance in understanding here so please just don't tell me to purchase inexpensive computer equipment and learn to use the applications. I'm quite interested in your efforts, but realize my own skills and limitations. The last time I did a magnetic circuit calculation I had a slide rule and adding machine at my disposal.
bi

[rakarskiy]

in the figure, there is a clear error in the magnetic flux between the rods of the electromagnets. What did Holcomb mean by portraying these interactions.

[rakarskiy]

I think that Holcomb thus uses the output of the lines of force from the core when closing the poles. We clearly observe this effect in the Kromrey generator, when there is a slamming and opening of the flow.