Holcomb Energy Systems:Breakthrough technology to the world

[bistander]

Can you make your Lenz to change periodic the magnetic permeability of rotor material(secondary ) ?
Exciting in this way, parametric oscillations in the secondary winding?
So that Lenz does not interfere with us, but helps?

Hi kolbacict,
The use of the term 'Lenz' has taken a meaning in these forums which I don't think is proper (classical definition related). However I think I understand what folks are talking about. And in design of DC motors having salient field poles, the effect would strengthen one pole tip and weaken the opposite pole tip. Strengthen and weaken referring to induction or flux density. As such, the permeability of the steel in those areas would certainly change. So from my experience, I'd say yes to your first question. I have no opinion about questions 2&3.
bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hello and happy Holidays to All,

Talking about "Lenz Law"...basically related to Electromagnetic Induction:

On All known Generators that we know so far, based on its main design, we are generating the Lenz effect, in every turn they make...and this applies also to Non Physically Rotating Generators, like HES.
How so?...Well, it has been a very simple method, ever since Faraday -first experiment- introduced a bar magnet into a coil and gave a positive output... to then, when He pulled it out, the galvanometer needle switched to the Negative side...simple uh?
And the fact is, everytime we pull out, or travel further away, our inducing (exciting) field, the "induced" or output coil(s) will deflect to Lenz effect, or negative side.

Fact is that 'all "bolts down" to Geometry'...

I am going to put as an example a pretty "imaginary" setup...

Say we build a full looped coil, closed in a perfect circle, so, we get our two terminals right next to each others at start-end of winding...and we have a cylindrical magnet inside of that looped coil...and by an exterior force (magnetic of course), we could set the magnet to spin continuously within that looped coil, rotating constantly in the same direction...
Would we have Lenz Effect at those two coil terminals?
The fact is that we all would be generating an always fully positive output in our meters...no opposite charges there, no negative deflection on meters needle, since the Magnetic Field is always traveling in one direction only...never "pulling out" of that coil...but in an infinite loop always following same rotation direction.

Think about it...

Regards to All

Ufopolitics

[kolbacict]

You cannot separate these actions.

It's a pity.

Fact is that 'all "bolts down" to Geometry'...

But maybe we can?
Can't living, thinking matter be able to defeat the laws of inanimate matter?

I'd say yes to your first question.

I understand. Thanks.

[Feb2006]

Most AC and DC generators use electromagnets so if you move the magnetic field solid state
then somehow Lenz's Law gets stronger than in generators with electromagnets. If that's true
electromagnetic generators should not work either.


A electromagnetic field is mass less however it can affect mass,
electrons or moving mass in a generator.
If you get rid of the moving mass then only electron mass is affected
and you don't have to count with  moving mass.
The Lenz's Law still applies.

[Dog-One]

Fact is that 'all "bolts down" to Geometry'...

I am going to put as an example a pretty "imaginary" setup...

Say we build a full looped coil, closed in a perfect circle, so, we get our two terminals right next to each others at start-end of winding...and we have a cylindrical magnet inside of that looped coil...and by an exterior force (magnetic of course), we could set the magnet to spin continuously within that looped coil, rotating constantly in the same direction...
Would we have Lenz Effect at those two coil terminals?
The fact is that we all would be generating an always fully positive output in our meters...no opposite charges there, no negative deflection on meters needle, since the Magnetic Field is always traveling in one direction only...never "pulling out" of that coil...but in an infinite loop always following same rotation direction.

Think about it...

I am thinking about it UFO.  I'm thinking it would produce a DC output as the Steven Mark's TPU was claimed to produce.

I have here sitting on my bench a medium sized nanocrystaline toroid core and I now have a method to produce a dipole magnetic field within this core.  I also have a means to rotate this dipole, but I'm not convinced I can wrap the entire core with wire and produce any output, let alone a DC output.  What I see are cancelled electric currents.  Unless...

Unless I split the output winding into two separate segments.  Then I get AC output on each segment.  Why is that?

Because the magnet is a dipole.  The north end produces an electric polarity and the south end produces the opposite electric polarity.  So as the magnet (the dipole) sweeps around the toroid, part of the conductor is positive while the rest is negative.  If you connect the two segments together (as they would be if you wrapped the toroid with a single conductor), the net EMF is zero and thusly, no current to any external load.

I'm pretty certain if you rewound the stator on a typical two pole generator to be a single conductor, you'd see zero output.  The number of conductor segments in the stator has to match the number of poles you have in rotation.

I could be totally wrong here, just stating what I'm seeing on the bench.


And as far as Lenz goes, it's something you must have.  The load, pushes back on the generator and if the generator doesn't push forward on Lenz, there is no current flow.  The current is going to take the path of least resistance, so you have to plug all the holes.  What I haven't seen yet, but is likely the key to this machine is some method where when the load pushes back on the generator, the generator pushes forward towards the load even harder.  Kind of like we see when trying to push two same poles of two magnets together.  That repulsion gets stronger the closer together those two poles meet.  That's what we are looking for, a means to strengthen that repulsive push and it's activated by the initial repulsive push from the load.  Maybe mechanically what has to happen is the generator's magnetic field becomes more focused, not necessarily stronger, just more concentrated where we need it.